Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Checking relevance for Tata Memorial Hospital Workers Union VS Tata Memorial Centre...
Checking relevance for General Manager, M/s Barsua Iron Ore Mines VS Vice President United Mines Mazdoor Union...
Checking relevance for Steel Authority Of India LTD. VS National Union Water Front Workers...
2001 6 Supreme 602 : The Central Ground Water Board is not an industry carried on by or under the authority of the Central Government, and therefore does not fall within the definition of ''''industry'''' for the purposes of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The determination of whether an entity is an ''''industry'''' under the Act depends on whether it is carried on by or under the authority of the Central Government, not merely because it is an instrumentality or agency of the Government. Since the Central Ground Water Board is not such an industry, it is not subject to the Industrial Disputes Act.Checking relevance for Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh, Nagpur VS Model Mills Nagpur LTD. ...
Checking relevance for Delhi International Airport Limited VS Indira Gandhi Airport TDI Karamchari Union...
Checking relevance for Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Karnataka VS Workmen Represented By The General Secretary, Karnataka Provident Fund Employees Union...
Checking relevance for S College, Madras VS Management of S. I. E. T. WomenMohamed Ibrahim and Others...
1989 0 Supreme(Mad) 483 : The Central Ground Water Board is not an ''''industry'''' within the meaning of Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as it is a department of the Central Government and falls under the category of ''''an authority established by or under a Central Act'''', which is not considered an ''''industry''''. The Supreme Court has held that educational institutions, though they may be ''''establishments'''', are not automatically ''''industries'''' under the Industrial Disputes Act unless they fall within the definition provided in Section 2(j), which includes ''''any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers and includes any calling, service, employment, handicraft, or industrial occupation or avocation of workmen''''. However, the Central Ground Water Board, being a statutory body functioning under the Central Government, does not constitute an ''''industry'''' for the purposes of the Industrial Disputes Act. This is consistent with the legal principle that government departments and statutory bodies established by law are not treated as ''''industries'''' unless specifically included.Checking relevance for Jamila Khan VS State of H. P. ...
Checking relevance for Employees In Relation To Management Of Central Horticultural Experiment Station VS Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2...
Checking relevance for Management of Dock Labour Board, Visakhapatnam VS Industrial Tribunal, Hyderabad...
Checking relevance for Research Director, Centeral Coffee Research Institute VS Labour Court, Kannur...
Checking relevance for Municipal Board, Jahangirabad, Bulandshahr VS State of U. P...
Checking relevance for CARLSBAD MINERAL WATER MFG. CO. LTD. VS P. K. SARKAR...
Checking relevance for Coir Board, Ernakulam, Cochin VS Indira Devi P. S...
Checking relevance for State Of U. P. VS Jai Bir Singh...
2005 4 Supreme 51 : The Central Ground Water Board, being a government department engaged in public welfare activities in discharge of constitutional obligations under Part IV of the Constitution (Directive Principles of State Policy), falls outside the purview of ''''industry'''' as defined under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. This is because such governmental activities, particularly those involving public welfare and sovereign functions, are not considered ''''industry'''' under the interpretation established in the Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board case, especially when they are not commercial or profit-oriented. The Supreme Court has held that activities undertaken by the State in the discharge of its constitutional obligations—such as public welfare initiatives—should be treated as sovereign functions and thus excluded from the definition of ''''industry''''.Checking relevance for National Union Of Commercial Employees, Bombay Incorporated Law Society, Intervener. VS M. B. Meher, Industrial Tribunal, Bombay...
Checking relevance for S. K. Verma VS Mahesh Chandra...
Checking relevance for Engineering Kamgar Union VS Electro Steels Castings LTD. ...
