Can Courts Determine If a Tender Document Depicts Fire?

2002 0 Supreme(Raj) 1973

Having gone through the ratio decided by the Apex Court and relevant provisions of clause of tender document as well as clause of fire protection manual I am of the firm opinion that no interference is required by this court as in contractual matters this court is not to interfere unless the ... Therefore, the petitioner seeks writ, order or direction of similar nature forbearing the respondent Nigam from proceeding further and signing a contract with the respondent ....

(2) whether there was a valid tender of the goods themselves, creating an obligation to pay such price. ... other document or documents whatsoever but any such tender or delivery as described in Clause 1 hereof shall be a good and valid tender or delivery ". ... The issues in the case stated shortly are (1) whether there was a valid tender by the plaintiffs to the defendants of documents against which they were bound to pay the purchase price, or, alternatively,....

2022 0 Supreme(Cal) 1602

does not sit like a court of appeal over the appropriate authority; the court must realise that the authority floating the tender is the best judge of its requirements and, therefore, the court’s interference should be minimal. ... Learned Single Judge by the impugned order has allowed the writ petition by holding that the appellants did not adhere to the mode of service stipulated in the tender document and in this regard learned Single Judge has relied upon clause 27 of the bid document#HL_E....

2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 1269

With regard to the contention that the expression “may” in the tender document whether confers a discretion on the bidder was considered by the learned Single Bench and it was held that the expression “may” has to be read as “shall” since the tender document also contains all the relevant clauses of ... Further it was held that it is a cardinal principle of law and well settled by several courts including this court and the Hon’ble Supreme Court, that it is the employ....

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2761

The more important issue is whether the appellant could have construed either Annexures XIX and XX or Clause 2.8 (iii) of the e-Bid  Document in a self-serving manner even before submitting its document for the Tender. 20. ... The issue germane to the adjudication before us is whether the appellant (respondent No.6 in the Writ Petition) should have been disqualified under the conditions of the e-Tender Document dated 15.05.2025. ... Resoursys Telecom, (2022) 5 SCC 362....

1999 0 Supreme(Gau) 88

The subject matter requiring adjudication in this proceeding pertains to eligibility to offer bids against a Notice Inviting Tender, which had arisen on the following circumstances. ... 2. ... It was indicated in the said Notice Inviting Tender that non-transferable » bidding document would be available in the office between 1400 hours to 1600 hours on any working day from 1.7.98 upto one day prior to the date of closing of bid on payment of the requisite tender fee. ... The basic question before this #....

2022 0 Supreme(All) 1360

The next question, which falls for consideration of this court is as to whether the Earnest Money Deposit submitted by the petitioner fulfil the requirement of clause 12 (c) of the Tender Document? ... 12(c ) of the tender document. ... bid are fulfilling the requirement of Clause- 12(c) of the tender document. ... As to whether this court can go into the said decision of the committee, the Hon’ble Supreme #HL_STAR....

2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 18623

The next question, which falls for consideration of this court is as to whether the Earnest Money Deposit submitted by the petitioner fulfil the requirement of clause 12 (c) of the Tender Document? ... 12(c ) of the tender document. ... the Tender document relating to EMD. ... the bid are fulfilling the requirement of Clause 12(c) of the tender document. ... As to whether this court#HL_E....

2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 1102

It is argued by the petitioner that fraud vitiates all and, as such, even the writ court can enter into the question as to whether the forgery committed by the respondent nos.9 and 10, allegedly in collusion with the IOCL, vitiates the tender process. ... What is to be seen is whether the respondent nos.9 and 10 uploaded genuine documents on the website of the IOCL, for the purpose of tender process and whether the IOCL independently verified the same to be correct. 27. ... The #HL_STA....

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 42766

The initial verification of documents had been made by the tender acceptance authority, based on the face value of the document which had been furnished. ... Once the issuing authority itself certifies that a document was never issued or that the claim is incorrect, the Court is not required to presume genuineness merely because the contractor asserts so. Bare denial or procedural objections do not displace such verification. ... This is not a stray case, there are several matters coming up before this court#HL....

2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 217

We must say that what has been said in this judgment is not in the nature of an exercise made to interpret the meaning of expression in question but an effort made to reach a conclusion in the context of facts of that case. So, the question involved was, whether the procedure adopted for submission of tender document in that case, unfairly affected the competitive position of other bidders or not or whether that procedure affected in any substantial manner the scope, quality or performance of the work or created any limits upon the employer's right or bidders liability, and this question was....

2017 0 Supreme(All) 1134

The issue involved in the case is whether the letter dated 12.2.1997 of the railway filed as Exhibit, S-2, was reliable document to be relied upon in a departmental proceeding on which Supreme Court in the case of “Roop Singh Negi v. Punjab National Bank and others, (2009) 2 SCC 570” has held that the evidence collected during the investigation cannot be treated to be evidence in the disciplinary proceedings unless such evidence is proved by the witnesses of the department. If the departmental witnesses merely tender the document and do not prove the contents thereof, the same coul....

2017 0 Supreme(Cal) 304

1. The dispute in the present appeal is whether words can be added to the tender document at a later stage, after the bids are received, while interpreting the document.

2016 0 Supreme(Del) 4000

1. The tender document, inter alia, provided for the deposit of earnest money which was to be deposited in the following form: (a) Rupees Twenty Lac Only in the shape of demand draft/deposit receipt/treasury challan/fixed deposit/ Receipt of a Scheduled Bank guaranteed by Reserved Bank of India; and (b) The balance earnest money (Rupees Nine Crore Fifty Lakhs) in the shape of a bank guarantee. 3. Subsequent to the floating of the tender, various amendments were made by the defendant no. 3/ M/s IVRCL Limited (hereinafter ‘the Joint Venture’). Accordingly, the tender document was pur....

2014 0 Supreme(Raj) 349

Tender document signed by a person other than mentioned above shall be treated as invalid and shall not be considered by tender opening committee.” (f) tender document shall be signed by proprietor in case of individual tenderer, all the partners of the firm/ all the members of association of persons or power of attorney holder of all the partners of the firm/ all the members of association of persons in case of firm/ association of persons and authorized person of the company by the resolution in case of company as the case may be.