Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Priority of Application Decision - The general principle is that applications for condonation of delay should be decided first before considering applications for leave to file an appeal, especially when both are filed by strangers to the suit. This approach ensures that the delay is properly excused prior to granting permission to appeal. ["Shanmugadurai, S/o. R. Iyyam Perumal Nadar vs B. Balakrishnan - Madras"] ["Omkar Tradecomm LLP VS Mayank Agarwal - Calcutta"] ["Keshu Savdas VS Deputy Collector and Prant Officer - Gujarat"]
Main Points and Insights:
In contrast, some cases argue that the absence of a specific statutory timeline for deciding leave applications means that the condonation application should be prioritized, especially when the delay is substantial or inordinate. The delay condonation application must be decided first to ensure procedural justice ["DIPALI CHAKRABORTY AND ORS vs PURNIMA CHAKRABORTY AND ORS - Calcutta"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
In the complex world of civil litigation in India, third parties—often referred to as 'strangers to suit proceedings'—frequently face hurdles when challenging judgments they're not directly part of. A common scenario arises when such a party files two critical applications simultaneously: one for leave to appeal (permission to file an appeal) and another for condonation of delay (excusing late filing). But which one must the court decide first?
This question—which application has to be decided first? application for leave to prefer appeal or application for condonation of delay when both applications are filed by stranger to suit proceedings—is pivotal for procedural fairness and efficiency. Getting it wrong can render efforts futile. Drawing from judicial precedents like the Kerala High Court in N. Ramchandran PottVishnubhia Arjanji Vaghela VS Rameshchandra Khodidas Patel - 2016 0 Supreme(Guj) 882, this post breaks down the established sequence, principles, and practical insights. Note: This is general information based on case law and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Leave to appeal is mandatory for non-parties under provisions like Order XLI Rule 3A CPC or specific statutes, ensuring only those with a genuine appealable interest proceed. The court's inquiry here is narrow: Does the stranger qualify as a 'person aggrieved'? Is there a prima facie case? As held, The core inquiry is whether the appellant has an appealable interest and whether the judgment or decree is amenable to appeal Vishnubhia Arjanji Vaghela VS Rameshchandra Khodidas Patel - 2016 0 Supreme(Guj) 882.
Strangers must demonstrate prejudice: A stranger cannot be permitted to file appeal in any proceedings unless he satisfies court that he falls with category of aggrieved persons Mooman Jafferali Aliji Maknojiya VS Shia Imami Ismaili Momin Jamat Samaj. Mere psychological or imaginary injury doesn't suffice; legal rights must be adversely affected Mooman Jafferali Aliji Maknojiya VS Shia Imami Ismaili Momin Jamat Samaj.
Under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, this excuses delays if 'sufficient cause' is shown, like lack of knowledge or unavoidable circumstances. Importantly, The court does not delve into the merits of the judgment at this stage Vishnubhia Arjanji Vaghela VS Rameshchandra Khodidas Patel - 2016 0 Supreme(Guj) 882. However, without a right to appeal (i.e., leave), condonation is pointless.
In N. Ramchandran Pott, the Kerala High Court ruled decisively: The application for leave to appeal should be considered first. Reasons include:- It determines appealable interest prima facie.- Condonation only follows if leave is granted, as without leave, the application for condonation is infructuous Vishnubhia Arjanji Vaghela VS Rameshchandra Khodidas Patel - 2016 0 Supreme(Guj) 882.- Issues like decree validity are deferred post-leave.
This aligns with efficiency: If leave is refused, the application for condonation becomes irrelevant, saving judicial time Vishnubhia Arjanji Vaghela VS Rameshchandra Khodidas Patel - 2016 0 Supreme(Guj) 882.
Multiple rulings reinforce this for third parties:- Courts note, considering condonation first would be premature, as the applicant's right to appeal hinges on the court's permission State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) vs Girish Kashyap - Delhi (2017)Commissioner Of Income Tax (central) Jaipur VS Nirmal Kumar Agarwal - 2018 0 Supreme(SC) 1807Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Sikar VS Commissioner Of Central Excise And Service Tax - 2018 0 Supreme(SC) 1421Commissioner Of Income Tax VS Trident Minerals (100% Eou) - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2246.- In consent decree challenges, applicants made more than a prima facie case for grant of leave to appeal... prima facie prejudicially affected by the consent decrees MOOMAN JAFFERALI ALIJI MAKNOJIYA VS SHIA IMAMI ISMAILI MOMIN JAMAT SAMAJ - 2021 Supreme(Guj) 657, with leave granted before deeper merits.
Contrastingly, in non-stranger or statutory contexts (e.g., consolidation appeals), condonation may precede: An application for condonation of delay has to be decided first by the appellate authority Ram Prakash VS Deputy Director of Consolidation, Hardoi - 2022 Supreme(All) 144. But for strangers, leave gates the process H. Anjanappa VS A. Prabhakar - 2025 2 Supreme 592.
Echoing Supreme Court views: Expression ‘person aggrieved’ does not include a person who suffers from a psychological or an imaginary injury; a person aggrieved must necessarily be one whose right or interest has been adversely affected Mooman Jafferali Aliji Maknojiya VS Shia Imami Ismaili Momin Jamat Samaj. Transferees pendente lite may seek leave if decrees bind them via res judicata H. Anjanappa VS A. Prabhakar - 2025 2 Supreme 592.
Here's the typical sequence for strangers:1. File Leave Application: Demonstrate aggrieved status and prima facie appealability.2. Court's Initial Hearing on Leave: Limited to interest check. If granted, proceed Vishnubhia Arjanji Vaghela VS Rameshchandra Khodidas Patel - 2016 0 Supreme(Guj) 882.3. File/Consider Condonation (Post-Leave): Show sufficient cause for delay, e.g., not mere financial woes Siddhapur Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd Thro Jasavantbhai Gopaldas Modh VS State Of Gujarat - 2024 Supreme(Guj) 418.4. Appeal on Merits: Only if both succeed.
Example from Case Law: In a neuro-degeneration guardianship dispute, applicants filed both; court allowed leave and condonation sequentially Dynacraft Machine Co. Ltd. VS Vinod Shenoy - 2019 Supreme(Bom) 2468Dynacraft Machine Co. Ltd. VS Vinod Shenoy - 2019 Supreme(Bom) 1928. Similarly, in property disputes, leave was scrutinized first H. Anjanappa VS A. Prabhakar - 2025 2 Supreme 592.
In summary applications or defenses, delays in leave apps are sometimes condoned separately, but appeals follow suit logic ITC INFOTECH INDIA LTD VS. MOHD AZAM - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 630.
For strangers to suit proceedings, courts generally decide the application for leave to appeal first, followed by condonation if leave is granted. This procedural hierarchy, upheld by Kerala HC Vishnubhia Arjanji Vaghela VS Rameshchandra Khodidas Patel - 2016 0 Supreme(Guj) 882 and echoed in precedents State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) vs Girish Kashyap - Delhi (2017)Mooman Jafferali Aliji Maknojiya VS Shia Imami Ismaili Momin Jamat Samaj, ensures only qualified appeals advance, promoting justice and resource efficiency.
Key Takeaways:- Prove Aggrieved Status First: Essential for leave.- Condonation is Secondary: Moot without leave.- File Strategically: Both together, but expect leave priority.- Seek Expert Help: Outcomes vary by facts.
This approach aligns with public policy on limitation Siddhapur Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd Thro Jasavantbhai Gopaldas Modh VS State Of Gujarat - 2024 Supreme(Guj) 418 and lis pendens H. Anjanappa VS A. Prabhakar - 2025 2 Supreme 592. Stay informed on evolving case law—your appeal's fate may hinge on sequence.
References:- Vishnubhia Arjanji Vaghela VS Rameshchandra Khodidas Patel - 2016 0 Supreme(Guj) 882 (Kerala HC lead case)- State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) vs Girish Kashyap - Delhi (2017), Commissioner Of Income Tax (central) Jaipur VS Nirmal Kumar Agarwal - 2018 0 Supreme(SC) 1807, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti Sikar VS Commissioner Of Central Excise And Service Tax - 2018 0 Supreme(SC) 1421, Commissioner Of Income Tax VS Trident Minerals (100% Eou) - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2246- Mooman Jafferali Aliji Maknojiya VS Shia Imami Ismaili Momin Jamat Samaj, MOOMAN JAFFERALI ALIJI MAKNOJIYA VS SHIA IMAMI ISMAILI MOMIN JAMAT SAMAJ - 2021 Supreme(Guj) 657, Siddhapur Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd Thro Jasavantbhai Gopaldas Modh VS State Of Gujarat - 2024 Supreme(Guj) 418, H. Anjanappa VS A. Prabhakar - 2025 2 Supreme 592, Ram Prakash VS Deputy Director of Consolidation, Hardoi - 2022 Supreme(All) 144
Word count approx. 1050. Always verify with latest judgments.
#LeaveToAppeal, #CondonationOfDelay, #CivilLitigation
Aggrieved with the said ex parte decree, the appellant herein filed an application to set aside the ex parte decree along with an application to condone the delay. The delay condonation application is A.No.2693 of 2011. The application to set aside the ex parte decree is A.No.910 of 2016. ... Similarly, CMP.No.6949 of 2022 is filed by the subsequent purchaser qua Mr.Shanmugadurai, being third party to the suit, see....
The Appellants along with the Memorandum of Appeal have filed an interlocutory application praying for leave to prefer this appeal without certified copy with a prayer for stay of the impugned order, and stating the grounds for delay in preferring these appeals of a period of 58 days and 66 days respectively ... We accordingly allow the applications for conversion and for condonation of delay in both the special #H....
Ltd. filed the Appeal from Order No.19 of 2017 along with the Civil Application for Leave to Appeal, Civil Application for condonation of delay in filing the Appeal and the Civil Application for interim relief before this Court challenging the first consent decree dated 15.03.2016 passed by the trial ... Ltd. filed the present First Appeal alon....
Ltd. filed the Appeal from Order No.19 of 2017 along with the Civil Application for Leave to Appeal, Civil Application for condonation of delay in filing the Appeal and the Civil Application for interim relief before this Court challenging the first consent decree dated 15.03.2016 passed by the trial ... Ltd. filed the present First Appeal alon....
This Civil Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 21.11.2013, passed by District Judge, Kulgam (for short “First Appellate Court”), dismissing the application seeking condonation of delay and as a consequence of which dismissing the appeal as well holding it as time barred. ... The appeal was to be filed within a period of 90 days from the date of passing of the judgment dated 29.12.2012 and the limitation would hav....
that the complainant fails to establish legally enforceable debt against which the application for seeking leave to prefer an appeal and appeal is filed alongwith an application seeking condonation of delay of 333 days. ... This application is filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act praying to condone the delay of 333 days in filing the application for seeki....
, it proceedings should be registered after condonation of delay. ... an appeal, should have been gone into by the authority dealing with the application for condonation of delay. ... to file an appeal should be granted or not, notwithstanding the fact that an application for condonation of delay is the subject for condonation of delay of tw....
of the application seeking condonation of delay. ... In these two applications, we are concerned with the prayer for leave to prosecute the appeal and condonation of delay. It is not disputed that appellants have purchased 4 acres of land out of the suit schedule property. ... Further the third defendant has filed R.F.A.No.396/2017 and withdrew the same. It is pleaded in the affidavit in support of the ap....
The leave to defend application was filed, along with an application seeking condonation of delay of 19 days which was rejected. 3. ... (i) is in affirmative, whether the application for condonation of delay is liable to be granted in favour of petitioner in respect of leave to defend application? ... Basic facts of the matter are that, a suit was filed bearing ....
Without referring to the merits of the present appeal, it is appropriate to first consider the I.A.No.1 of 2025 filed for condonation of delay of 2043 days in preferring the appeal. 4. ... No court could be justified in condoning such an inordinate delay by imposing any condition whatsoever. The application is to be decided only within the parameters laid down by this Court in regard to the condonation of #HL_START....
An application for condonation of delay has to be decided first by the appellate authority and in case allowed, the appeal may be decided on merits on a subsequent date. In Bhagwat and others Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and others (1990) RD 162, a Single Bench of this Court opined that an order deciding an application seeking condonation of delay cannot be said to be interlocutory and revision against that order was maintainable.
Hence, they preferred the Civil Application for leave to prefer an appeal and also an application for condonation of delay, which was allowed by this court. 8. On the basis of the impugned order, the Respondent filed an application before the NCLT and at that time, the Appellant learnt that the Trial Court passed the impugned order in favour of the Respondent declaring him as a guardian of Ms.Jessica.
8. On the basis of the impugned order, the Respondent filed an application before the NCLT and at that time, the Appellant learnt that the Trial Court passed the impugned order in favour of the Respondent declaring him as a guardian of Ms. Jessica. Hence, they preferred the Civil Application for leave to prefer an appeal and also an application for condonation of delay, which was allowed by this court.
Yet we considered application and looking to wider interest of justice, both are being allowed. The appeal was admitted by the order dated 19.7.2017, delay was condoned and thereafter the appeal became ripe for final hearing and are being heard finally. 2. The appellants filed an application for leave to appeal (though not supported by an independent applicant) as well as the delay condonation application.
Now, in case where third party seeks leave to file an appeal wherein time to file an appeal has expired, whether leave to file an appeal should be considered first or application for condonation of delay should be heard first? Shri Desai submitted that hearing of delay condonation application shall precede hearing of leave to appeal inasmuch as once leave is granted then there remains nothing for consideration of delay condonation application. On the other hand, Shri Shah submitted that prior hearing of leave to appeal is proper mode and delay condonation application cannot....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
