Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
The word amount is generally understood as a quantifiable sum of money payable or receivable in legal contexts. Several judgements clarify that amount refers to specific sums involved in financial transactions, dues, or obligations. For example, in the case KAPRI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) THROUGH LIQUIDATOR vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IV, NEW DELHI - Delhi_Delhi_2022_DHC_003086, the amount payable is linked to specific statutory provisions, emphasizing that it represents a definite monetary figure owed by a party. Similarly, in the case KAPRI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) THROUGH LIQUIDATOR vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IV, NEW DELHI - Delhi_SC_4_684_2020, the term default relates to not paying a sum of money, indicating that amount pertains to monetary sums that are due or unpaid KAPRI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) THROUGH LIQUIDATOR vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IV, NEW DELHI - Delhi, Mohan Lal Dhakad Vs BNG Global India Ltd - Supreme Court.
Contextual Usage in Statutes and Contracts:
Several sources highlight that amount is often used in legal statutes to denote specific sums such as taxes, dues, or payments. For instance, under the VSV Act, amount payable includes categories like disputed tax, interest, penalty, etc., indicating that amount can refer to various monetary obligations, whether certain or disputed KAPRI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) THROUGH LIQUIDATOR vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IV, NEW DELHI - Delhi.
Judicial Clarifications:
Courts have clarified that amount typically refers to a precise sum of money involved in a transaction or obligation, and the context determines its scope. In the case of water tax, the Supreme Court distinguished between tax collected and consideration for services, emphasizing that amount in tax law refers to a specific monetary figure collected or payable Mahaprabandhak Jal Sansthan vs Smt. Meena Devi - Consumer State, Mahaprabandhak Jal Sansthan vs Smt. Meena Devi - Consumer State.
Related Terms and Interpretations:
The prevailing judicial perspective is that amount unambiguously refers to a specific sum of money involved in a legal obligation, transaction, or statutory requirement. Its precise meaning depends on the context—whether it is a debt, tax, penalty, or compensation—yet it fundamentally signifies a quantifiable monetary figure that is payable or receivable. Courts have consistently held that amount is a clear and definite term, crucial in legal proceedings related to payments, dues, or financial obligations.
References:- KAPRI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) THROUGH LIQUIDATOR vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IV, NEW DELHI - Delhi_Delhi_2022_DHC_003086- KAPRI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) THROUGH LIQUIDATOR vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IV, NEW DELHI - Delhi_SC_4_684_2020- Pramod Singh VS State of U. P. - Allahabad- Mahaprabandhak Jal Sansthan vs Smt. Meena Devi - Consumer State- Mahaprabandhak Jal Sansthan vs Smt. Meena Devi - Consumer State
In legal contexts, precise language is everything. Words like amount appear frequently in statutes, contracts, and judgments, often referring to money owed, paid, or disputed. But what does amount legally mean? Is there a landmark judgment that explicitly defines it? This post dives into available legal documents and judgments to address the question: Judgement which Defines the Word Amount. We'll examine core findings, interpretation principles, and contextual uses to provide clarity—while noting this is general information, not specific legal advice.
A thorough review of key legal documents reveals no specific judgment or statutory clause that explicitly defines the word amountCentral Inland Water Transport Corporation LTD. VS Brojo Nath Ganguly: Tarun Kanti Sengupta - 1986 0 Supreme(SC) 115Dhiraj Kumar Sharma vs State of M.P. - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 780Kanhaiya Lal Trust VS State of U. P. - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 374. Instead, these texts focus on broader interpretative principles for words like includes and means.
This absence suggests that amount is typically given its natural, ordinary, or popular meaning unless specified otherwise Central Inland Water Transport Corporation LTD. VS Brojo Nath Ganguly: Tarun Kanti Sengupta - 1986 0 Supreme(SC) 115Dhiraj Kumar Sharma vs State of M.P. - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 780. In everyday legal usage, this often points to a quantity of money.
A close examination of documents like Oswal Fats and Oils Limited VS Additional Commissioner (Administration), Bareilly Division, Bareilly - 2010 2 Supreme 726 (definitions of person), Ramanlal Bhailal Patel VS State of Gujarat - 2008 1 Supreme 722 (creditor, debt, debtor), and Black Diamond Beverages VS Commercial Tax Officer, Central Section, Assessment Wing, Calcutta - 1997 8 Supreme 321 (sale price) shows no direct reference to amount. Similarly, Bhuwalka Steel Indus. Ltd. VS Bombay Iron & Steel Labour Ltd. - 2009 8 Supreme 259 covers labor law definitions, Mahender Singh VS Union of India - 2010 7 Supreme 579 interprets industry, and Kanbi Nanji Virji VS State Of Gujarat - 1969 0 Supreme(SC) 401 discusses settlement and payment—but skips amount Kanbi Nanji Virji VS State Of Gujarat - 1969 0 Supreme(SC) 401BASANT LAL WADEHRA VS UNION OF INDIA - 1996 0 Supreme(Del) 157.
Even Arpit Jhanwar VS Kamlesh Jain - Crimes (2012), which touches on amount in insurance policies, does not provide a formal legal definition or judgment defining it. The pattern is clear: legal texts prioritize contextual interpretation over rigid definitions for common terms like amount.
In the absence of a definition, courts apply general rules:- Words in interpretation clauses take their natural, ordinary, or popular meaningCentral Inland Water Transport Corporation LTD. VS Brojo Nath Ganguly: Tarun Kanti Sengupta - 1986 0 Supreme(SC) 115Dhiraj Kumar Sharma vs State of M.P. - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 780.- Includes extends or enlarges the scope of a definition Kanhaiya Lal Trust VS State of U. P. - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 374.- Context from the statute or contract guides meaning Administrator Smt. Tara Bai Desai Charitable Opthalmic Trust Hospital, Jodhpur VS Managing Director Supreme Elevators India Pvt. Ltd. - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2497.
For amount, this implies its ordinary sense as a quantifiable sum, especially monetary BANGALORE CLUB VS COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX - 2020 0 Supreme(SC) 531K. LAKSHMINARAYANAN VS UNION OF INDIA - 2018 0 Supreme(SC) 1226.
While core documents lack a definition, other sources offer contextual clarity on how amount is understood in practice. These reinforce that amount typically denotes a specific sum of money in obligations, payments, or disputes.
Sources like Commissioner General of Inland Revenue VS John Keells Holding PLC - 2023 Supreme(SRI)(CA) 679 - 2023 Supreme(SRI)(CA) 679 define related terms (e.g., revision via dictionaries), suggesting courts may turn to ordinary meanings or dictionaries for undefined words like amount.
Summary from Sources: Amount is consistently a quantifiable monetary figure—taxes, dues, payments, or penalties KAPRI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) THROUGH LIQUIDATOR vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IV, NEW DELHI - DelhiMohan Lal Dhakad Vs BNG Global India Ltd - Supreme CourtPramod Singh VS State of U. P. - Allahabad. Courts distinguish it in tax vs. service contexts Mahaprabandhak Jal Sansthan vs Smt. Meena Devi - Consumer StateMahaprabandhak Jal Sansthan vs Smt. Meena Devi - Consumer State.
Without a universal definition, amount's meaning depends on context:- In contracts: Total sum payable.- In statutes: Specific dues like tax or interest.- In judgments: Quantifiable claims or awards.
Recommendations:- Always check the specific statute, contract, or case for contextual clues Central Inland Water Transport Corporation LTD. VS Brojo Nath Ganguly: Tarun Kanti Sengupta - 1986 0 Supreme(SC) 115.- Use ordinary meaning (sum of money) unless overridden.- Consult external sources or precedents for disputes Jaypee Infratech Limited VS Ehbh Services Private Limited - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 294.- Seek professional advice for case-specific application.
No single judgment explicitly defines amount in the reviewed documents Central Inland Water Transport Corporation LTD. VS Brojo Nath Ganguly: Tarun Kanti Sengupta - 1986 0 Supreme(SC) 115Dhiraj Kumar Sharma vs State of M.P. - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 780. It generally means a specific, quantifiable sum of money, interpreted via ordinary meaning and context. This flexibility aids legal application but requires caution.
Key Takeaways:- Rely on interpretative principles like those for includes and means Kanhaiya Lal Trust VS State of U. P. - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 374.- Contextual examples from cases like KAPRI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) THROUGH LIQUIDATOR vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IV, NEW DELHI - Delhi_SC_4_684_2020 affirm monetary usage.- For precision, reference full statutes or consult a lawyer.
This analysis draws from provided references; outcomes may vary by jurisdiction. Always verify with qualified counsel.
K.B.Virvadiya particularly relied upon at para 10 of this judgement that states as Section 2(1)(d) defines "consumer" as follows:- "Consumer" means any person who, (i) ii) Opponents are directed to pay amount of Rs. ... For the complainant has referred para 12 which defines Section 2(1)(o) defines “service” thus: “Service means service of any description which is made available to po....
Creditors’ everywhere mentioned the word ... After all, the word ‘default’ is like not doing something which one should do. ... Suffice it to point that the word ‘default’, applies to a sum of money which was ... between ‘Deposits’ and ‘Loans’ may not be a significant factor for interpreting the word ... for the ‘Appellant’ refers to the judgement
with regard to disturbances with special word the public order. ... Section 2(b) of the Act, which defines a Gang, is crucial. 16. ... Srivastava, learned Senior Advocate is on the words "with object of disturbing public order" used in Section 2(b) of the Act, which defines a Gang. ... On the basis of the aforementioned, it is submitted that the facts alleged in the first information report do not make out any violence, threat or show of vi....
Amount payable by declarant ●Section 4. Filing of declaration and particulars to be This is a digitally signed Judgement. ... In the rejoinder, the petitioner contended that the word „appeal‟ has not been defined in the VSV Act. ... It was contended by the CIT that Section 2 (1) (a) of the VSV Act defines „appellant‟ and Section 2 (1) (h) defines the „disputed interest‟ and that....
Section 3(b) of the Act 1956 defines the word Section 21 of the Act, 1956 defines the word Aggrieved with the aforesaid impugned judgement Act, 1984 has been filed praying to set aside the judgement ... Before parting with this judgement, it would be in span
This was considered in the judgement of Honourable Supreme Court in Lucknow Development Authority v. M. K. Gupta, 1994 AIR P 787 in the following manner:- 4. What is the meaning of the word ‘service’? ... This can be observed that the statute defines the amount collected by the Sansthan for water uses by a house owner as ‘Tax’ and not a consideration for sale of water or any service rendered by the Sansthan for supply of ....
This was considered in the judgement of Honourable Supreme Court in Lucknow Development Authority v. M. K. Gupta, 1994 AIR P 787 in the following manner:- 4. What is the meaning of the word ‘service’? ... This can be observed that the statute defines the amount collected by the Sansthan for water uses by a house owner as ‘Tax’ and not a consideration for sale of water or any service rendered by the Sansthan for supply of ....
She further submits that the judgement of Kerala High Court is not applicable in the present case as two entries are different. UP VAT Act refers spcific word "Vanaspati ( hydrogenated vegetable oil)". ... Under the aforesaid case, entry of "others", including 'vanaspati' was interpreted by the Kerala High Court by holding that the general word "other" is followed by the specific word "including vanaspati". ... She has fur....
No replies This is a digitally signed Judgement. ... The actual amount received by the defendants prior to the filing of the present suit is Rs.1,50,81,004/- and not Rs.1.51,00,000/-. In support thereof, I.A. ... No.6249/2022, it has been stated that inadvertently, the plaint mentions a receipt of sum of Rs.1.51 crores out of the agreed amount of total consideration of Rs.2.15 crores. ... I am in respectful agreement with the v....
The Black’s Law Dictionary, 10th Edition, defines the word revision as ‘ re-examination or careful review for correction or improvement’. Collins Online Dictionary defines the word ‘revise’ to mean to read over carefully and correct, improve, or update where necessary. ... The counter-argument of the Appellant is that the word ‘revise’ is not limited to arithmetic revisions. The Concise Oxford Dictionary ....
Act defines the word Business which is as follows :- (i) any trade, commerce, manufacture or any adventure or concern in the nature of trade, commerce or manufacture, whether or not such trade, commerce, manufacture, adventure or concern is carried on with a motive to make gain or profit and whether or not any gain or profit accrues from such trade, commerce, manufacture, adventure or concern and irrespective of the volume, frequency, continuity or regularity of such trade, c....
Section 2 (1) of the Act defines the word, ‘teacher ‘education’, Section 2 (m) of the Act defines the word, ‘teacher education qualification’, Section 2 (n) of the Act defines the word, ‘University’. 15. Section 2 (h) of the Act, defines the word, ‘prescribed’, Section 2 (i) of the Act defines the word, ‘recognised’, Section 2 (j) defines the word, ‘regional committee’ and Section 2 (k) of the Act defines the word, ‘regulations’. For convenience, relevant sub-sections of Sect....
Section 2 of the said Act contains definition clause relating to various words, used in the Act. Sub-section (c) of Section 2 of the Act defines the meaning of ‘recognised institution. Section 2 (h) of the Act, defines the word, ‘prescribed’, Section 2 (i) of the Act defines the word, ‘recognised’, Section 2 (j) defines the word, ‘regional committee’ and Section 2 (k) of the Act defines the word, ‘regulations’. Section 2 (1) of the Act defines the word, ‘teacher ‘education’, ....
8. Section 2 of the Kerala Lok Ayukta Act, 1999 is the definition clause. Section 2(a) defines the word 'action', Section 2(b) defines the word 'allegation' and Section 2(e) defines the word "corruption", which are to the following effect: In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires.-
To point out implication of use of word "prescribed", our attention is drawn to provisions of section 2 [17] which defines word "prescribed" and section 2 [23] which defines word "Rule". According to him, Government letter dated 17th of August 1991 therefore refers to 1981 Rules and not to any GR. Entire arguments advanced on the basis of SS Code therefore need to be discarded. As the statutory provisions occupies the field, executive instructions cannot prevail.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
