Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
In some rulings, the period of prohibition is explicitly linked to the date of the final order or date of grant, and the courts have clarified that the date of issuance of the grant certificate is not always the starting point ["Sushila D/o Krishna Dharmoje vs Annappa Krishna Dharmoje - Karnataka"], ["ANKIT DESAI VS HANUMANNA - 1991 0 Supreme(Kar) 497"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
Land grants in India, particularly in Karnataka, often come with restrictions on alienation to protect beneficiaries, especially from marginalized communities. A common question arises: non alienation period in case of general grant shall be computed from what date? Is it the grant order, the issuance of the grant certificate, or actual possession? This blog post breaks down the legal position, drawing from judicial precedents and rules, to clarify this for landowners, legal practitioners, and authorities.
Understanding this starting point is crucial, as premature alienation can lead to resumption orders under laws like the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 (PTCL Act). Note: This is general information based on case law and should not be taken as specific legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
The non-alienation period is a restriction imposed on grantees prohibiting the sale, mortgage (in some cases), or transfer of granted land for a fixed duration, typically 10-25 years depending on the grant type (free grant, upset price, etc.). This ensures the land benefits the intended recipient, often from Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), or other eligible groups under Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969, and Mysore Land Revenue Rules.
For general land grants, the period protects against quick flips while allowing eventual free disposal post-restriction.
In cases of general land grants, the non-alienation period shall be computed from the date of actual possession or enjoyment of the land, typically evidenced by the issuance of a grant certificate or saguvali chit, rather than merely the date of the original grant order. NARASAREDDY VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT, CHICKMAGALUR - 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 313
Key points include:- The starting point is when the grantee takes possession or begins enjoying the land.- Issuance of the grant certificate or saguvali chit often marks this effective date.- Courts emphasize linking the restriction to actual enjoyment, not the initial order. NARASAREDDY VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT, CHICKMAGALUR - 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 313
As held in a key judgment: even where the Rules employ the term 'the date of the grant', that term should be read as the date from which the grant certificate is actually issued to the grantee and not from the date the order was made in his favour. NARASAREDDY VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT, CHICKMAGALUR - 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 313
This interpretation aligns with the legislative intent to ensure beneficiaries truly utilize the land before alienating it. S. N. NAGENDRA VS HUCHAIAH - 1997 0 Supreme(Kar) 546
Several Karnataka High Court decisions reinforce this position:
These cases consistently tie the clock to actual possession/enjoyment, evidenced documentally.
While the above dominate for general grants, some rulings nuance the position:
Post-period, no government permission is needed for alienation. Mayura Sreeram W/o Late Dr. Sree Ramasetty vs Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore - 2025 Supreme(Kar) 836 quashed resumptions for post-expiry transfers, affirming: permission is only during the non-alienation period. (Paras 100, 101)
Mortgages may not count as alienation: SOUTH CANARA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. VS STATE OF KARNATAKA - 2024 Supreme(Kar) 535 upheld mortgage enforcement under 25-year clause in Ashraya scheme grants, as mortgage ≠ alienation.
Authorities must verify records (e.g., saguvali registers, mutation) even if originals missing—duty under welfare laws. G. K. MALLIKARJUNAPPA VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DAVANGERE DISTRICT, DAVANGERE - 2005 Supreme(Kar) 48
Generally, for general land grants, the non-alienation period starts from the date of possession or grant certificate issuance, promoting the scheme's object of sustained beneficiary enjoyment. While some cases favor grant order dates, judicial trend prioritizes actual control. NARASAREDDY VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT, CHICKMAGALUR - 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 313S. N. NAGENDRA VS HUCHAIAH - 1997 0 Supreme(Kar) 546ANKIT DESAI VS HANUMANNA - 1991 0 Supreme(Kar) 497
Key Takeaways:- Primary Trigger: Possession/enjoyment via certificate. NARASAREDDY VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT, CHICKMAGALUR - 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 313- Duration Varies: 10-25 years by grant type.- Post-Expiry Freedom: No permission needed. Mayura Sreeram W/o Late Dr. Sree Ramasetty vs Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore - 2025 Supreme(Kar) 836- Violations Risk Resumption: Null transfers, no limitation defense.
Stay informed on evolving rules like Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969. For personalized guidance, seek expert legal counsel.
References: Key cases NARASAREDDY VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT, CHICKMAGALUR - 2002 0 Supreme(Kar) 313, S. N. NAGENDRA VS HUCHAIAH - 1997 0 Supreme(Kar) 546, ANKIT DESAI VS HANUMANNA - 1991 0 Supreme(Kar) 497, HANUMANNA VS MACHAPPA - 1995 Supreme(Kar) 590, Mayura Sreeram W/o Late Dr. Sree Ramasetty vs Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore - 2025 Supreme(Kar) 836, SOUTH CANARA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. VS STATE OF KARNATAKA - 2024 Supreme(Kar) 535, Kuntegowda & Others VS Deputy Commissioner Tumakuru District & Others - 2008 Supreme(Kar) 755, G. K. MALLIKARJUNAPPA VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DAVANGERE DISTRICT, DAVANGERE - 2005 Supreme(Kar) 48.
#LandGrants #NonAlienation #KarnatakaLaw
within the specified period of non-alienation. ... However, in this case, the question as to whether permission was required for alienation after the period of non alienation had expired and the alienation made after the Act had come into force was not involved or considered in that case, and the only question involved in that case was whether a land ... In light of the fact that the Rule relating....
the land granted and therefore the period of non-alienation is to be computed from the said date. ... In the case of Laxmamma, supra, it was held the period of non-alienation could be computed from the date of grant and not from the date of the issue of grant certificate to the grantee and held as under. "74. ... Therefore, on the date of the order of grant if the grantee is put ....
In addition to that, the Apex Court had occasion to consider the situation where the land is transferred after the expiry of the non-alienation clause; and the Apex Court in Manchegowda’s case (supra), held that, in case the land is transferred after the expiry of the non-alienation clause, before ... Thus, it is his contention that the first transaction has taken place 15 years after the grant, and after expiry of the restriction on non-al....
for the purpose- of inspecting the same, that the said land has been for one year neglected and uncultivated, then, and in such case, this grant shall be utterly void and of none effect. ... , and no more, of .the produce thereof as the Government share of rent thereof, subject, nevertheless, to such general regulations as Government shall hereafter publish. ... -a case turning on the construction of the very grant with which we are here concerned that the right....
It is contended by the State that the grant is subject to a restriction which prohibits alienation of the property granted for a period of 25 years. ... Conditions of grant: (1) The grant of lands under these rules for agricultural purposes shall be jointly in the name of husband and wife and shall be subject to the following conditions namely: (i) the grantee shall not alienate the land for a period of twenty-five ... Provided furt....
the expiry of the non-alienation clause and held that at the time of grant, non- alienation clause for a period of 15 years was imposed and it is only after the lapse of said period, the suit for specific performance was filed by the respondent. ... specific performance has been sought prior to the expiry of the non- alienation clause and held that at the time of grant, non- alienation#H....
It was contended on behalf of the petitioners in that case that wherever the rules read, "the date of grant" in particular in respect of the rules that were in force in the old Mysore area before 1960, the period of non-alienation should be computed from "the date of grant" only and not from the date ... On the other hand, the said Rule, which was in force at the time of the grant of land to the first respondent, would clearly indicate that the #HL_S....
of non-alienation is to be computed from the said date. ... Therefore, on the date of the order of grant if the grantee is put in possession and grant certificate is also issued there is no difficulty in holding that period of non- alienation is to be computed from the date of ... of non-alienation clause in respect of grants prior to 1969 Rules. ... In the case on h....
Therefore, on the date of the order of grant if the grantee is put in possession and grant certificate is also issued there is no difficulty in holding that period of non- alienation is to be computed from the date of ... of non-alienation clause in respect of grants prior to 1969 Rules. ... As per the saguvali chit which has been issued on 20.05.1942 there is a condition of non-alienation for a #HL_ST....
On 19.01.1942 land measuring 02 acres 23 guntas was granted in favour of Bangaraiah, the grandfather of respondents 3(a) to 3(d) with a permanent non-alienation clause. The Appellant however, asserts that the Grant stipulated non-alienation for a period of 10 years only. ... the basis of an alienation made in his favour by an allottee, the period of limitation shall be 30 years. ... ... iii) So far as the first grant#HL_E....
The said grant is attached with the terms and conditions including non-alienation condition for a period of 15 years from the grant. 8. The lands in question are granted lands in favour of the original grantee Muniyappa is not in dispute. The date of grant is 1.10.1961 and the grantee Muniyappa sold the granted land by sale deed 9.10.1967 to Ramaiah Reddy. The first alienation had taken place in utter violation of the terms of grant.
This grant contained a non-alienation clause for period of 15 years. The transaction of sale between the petitioner-Venkateshappa with K.V. Venkataramappa and K.V.Anjanappa (respondents nos.7 & 8) took place within the said period of 15 years. We may clarify, the transaction was between the petitioner and above respondents on 29.09.1977 and further alienations have taken place. 4. The learned Single judge has noted that, the land was granted in favour of a person belonging to Scheduled Caste community vide saguwali Chit issued on 05.07.1977.
This grant contained a non-alienation clause for period of 15 years. We may clarify, the transaction was between the petitioner and above respondents on 29.09.1977 and further alienations have taken place. 4. The learned Single judge has noted that, the land was granted in favour of a person belonging to Scheduled Caste community vide saguwali Chit issued on 05.07.1977. The transaction of sale between the petitioner-Venkateshappa with K.V. Venkataramappa and K.V.Anjanappa (respondents nos.7 & 8) took place within the said period of 15 years.
Therefore, on the date of the order of grant if the grantee is put in possession and grant certificate is also issued there is no difficulty in holding that period of non-alienation is to be computed from the date of grant itself. There are also cases where even before the order of grant the grantee was already in possession and an order of grant was made subsequently. But if on the date of grant order possession is not delivered, but possession is delivered subsequently under a grant certificate or a saguvali chit, then that would be the effective date from which the grant....
This aspect apart, even ignoring the finding that the grant is a free grant, the condition of fifteen years as culled out from the records, is very much available and does stare at the petitioner. It is not in dispute that when it was a grant with a condition of non-alienation period of 10 years, the grant is for upset price and if the non-alienation period is fifteen years, it is a free grant.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
