Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Section 202 Cr.P.C. Mandatory Inquiry - When an accused resides outside the jurisdiction of the magistrate, it is mandatory for the magistrate to conduct an inquiry under Section 202(1) of Cr.P.C. before issuing process in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Failure to do so invalidates the process and warrants remand or quashing of the proceedings Rakesh Chandra Rastogi VS State of Uttarakhand - Uttarakhand, Pawan Kumar Agarwal VS State of West Bengal - Crimes, Odi Jerang VS Nabajyoti Baruah - Supreme Court.
Jurisdiction and Resident Status - The address of the accused recorded in the complaint must be within the court’s jurisdiction. If the accused resides outside the jurisdiction, the magistrate must follow the inquiry procedure under Section 202 before proceeding. Cases have been quashed or remanded when this procedure was not followed despite the accused residing beyond the territorial jurisdiction Pawan Kumar Agarwal VS State of West Bengal - Crimes, Pawan Kumar Agarwal vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. - Calcutta, Pawan Kumar Agarwal vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. - Calcutta, Pawan Kumar Agarwal vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. - Calcutta, Pawan Kumar Agarwal vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. - Calcutta.
Exceptions and Evidence - Under Section 145(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the complainant can give evidence via affidavit, and the recording of statements under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. is not always necessary for summoning the accused. Evidence by affidavit may suffice for the magistrate to decide on issuing process, especially when the complainant’s address is within jurisdiction Ashok Kumar Gupta VS Anil Gupta - Delhi.
Legal Divergence and Judicial View - There has been divergence among courts regarding whether an inquiry under Section 202 is necessary when the accused resides outside the jurisdiction. Some courts emphasize the mandatory nature of Section 202(1), requiring postponement of process if the accused’s residence is beyond jurisdiction, while others accept affidavits as sufficient evidence for summoning without a formal inquiry Ashok Kumar Gupta VS Anil Gupta - Delhi.
Analysis and Conclusion:The consensus across the cited judgments indicates that Section 202 Cr.P.C. is mandatory when the accused resides outside the jurisdiction of the magistrate in cases under Section 138 of the NI Act. Failure to conduct this inquiry before issuing process renders the proceedings illegal, as seen in multiple rulings where processes were quashed or cases remanded due to non-compliance. While affidavits and evidence under Section 145 can sometimes suffice, the procedural safeguard of inquiry under Section 202 remains a critical requirement to uphold the legality of proceedings involving non-resident accused persons.
In the realm of criminal law, procedural sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) play a pivotal role in ensuring fair trials and preventing abuse of process. One such provision is Section 202 CrPC, which mandates an inquiry before issuing process against an accused residing outside the magistrate's jurisdiction. But what is the purpose of Section 202 CrPC in a criminal trial? Primarily, it serves to verify if there are sufficient grounds to proceed, protecting both the complainant and the accused from frivolous litigation while expediting genuine cases.
This is particularly relevant in high-volume cheque bounce cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act), where jurisdictional issues often arise. This blog post delves into the purpose, applicability, and judicial interpretations of Section 202 CrPC, drawing from landmark judgments and legal principles. Note: This is general information based on case law and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Section 202 CrPC empowers the magistrate to postpone the issuance of process and conduct an inquiry or direct investigation when the offence's particulars are unknown or the accused resides outside the court's territorial jurisdiction. The core purpose is to ascertain whether a prima facie case exists before summoning the accused, thereby filtering out baseless complaints and saving judicial time Shivshankar Shrikrushna Dhole VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay (2021).
In Section 138 NI Act cases—commonly known as cheque dishonour cases—this provision gains heightened importance. These cases often involve accused persons from different states, raising jurisdiction questions. The Supreme Court's Constitution Bench in Re: Expeditious Trial of Cases Under Section 138 of N.I. Act, 1881 clarified its applicability, emphasizing compliance even in summary trials under the NI Act Shivshankar Shrikrushna Dhole VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay (2021).
The inquiry becomes mandatory if the accused resides beyond the magistrate's jurisdiction. As stated: Inquiry under s. 202 of CrPC—Mandatory where accused resides beyond territorial jurisdiction Mayank Poddar VS State of West Bengal - 2017 Supreme(Cal) 436 - 2017 0 Supreme(Cal) 436. Failure to conduct it can lead to quashing of proceedings or remand Rakesh Chandra Rastogi VS State of Uttarakhand - UttarakhandPawan Kumar Agarwal VS State of West Bengal - CrimesOdi Jerang VS Nabajyoti Baruah - Supreme Court.
For instance, in cases where the address of the accused recorded in the complaint is within the jurisdiction of learned Metropolitan Magistrate no inquiry may be needed, but if outside, it is essential Pawan Kumar Agarwal vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. - 2023 Supreme(Online)(CAL) 9911 - 2023 Supreme(Online)(CAL) 9911. Courts have quashed processes when magistrates skipped this step despite the accused being non-residents Pawan Kumar Agarwal vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. - CalcuttaPawan Kumar Agarwal vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. - CalcuttaPawan Kumar Agarwal vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. - Calcutta.
The process need not be cumbersome. Under Section 145(1) NI Act, evidence can be taken on affidavit, streamlining proceedings: The inquiry under Section 202 can be satisfied by taking evidence on affidavit, as permitted by Section 145 of the N.I. Act Shivshankar Shrikrushna Dhole VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay (2021)Vishwakalyan Multistate Credit Co Op Society Ltd. VS Oneup Entertainment Private Limited - Supreme Court (2023).
Magistrates have discretion in the inquiry's scope—it may involve examining documents without witness presence: The inquiry may be limited to examining documents without requiring the presence of witnesses, depending on the circumstances of the case Vishwakalyan Multistate Credit Co Op Society Ltd. VS Oneup Entertainment Private Limited - Supreme Court (2023)Usha Agarwalla VS Citicorp Finance (I) Ltd. - Calcutta (2023). In one case, when it was found that accused No.1 is not resident of jurisdiction of concerned Magistrate, the report under Section 202 of Code of Criminal Procedure was called Satish Sudhakar Patil VS State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Begumpura - 2017 Supreme(Bom) 2004 - 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 2004.
The Supreme Court has firmly endorsed the mandatory inquiry: Section 202 of the Cr.P.C. mandates that when the accused resides outside the jurisdiction of the concerned Magistrate, an inquiry must be conducted to ascertain whether sufficient grounds exist to proceed against the accused. This requirement applies even to complaints filed under Section 138 of the N.I. Act Shivshankar Shrikrushna Dhole VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay (2021).
While the apex court view prevails, some high courts have opined differently: Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be issued without making any inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or not Pawan Kumar Agarwal vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. - 2023 Supreme(Online)(CAL) 10288 - 2023 Supreme(Online)(CAL) 10288. Others argued Section 142 NI Act overrides CrPC Aashish Jhunjhunwala VS Kamal Dihidar - Calcutta (2023)Prof. D. Kannammal VS Renuga Palanisamy - Madras (2007). However, the consensus tilts towards mandatory compliance: The consensus across the cited judgments indicates that Section 202 Cr.P.C. is mandatory when the accused resides outside the jurisdiction of the magistrate in cases under Section 138 of the NI Act (from analysis in sources).
In practice, the trial Court has not conducted an inquiry within the purview of Section 202... The Court has recorded the verification statement of the complainant as well as considered the affidavit filed by the complainant—yet process was upheld if substantial compliance shown Vijay Tata Ravipati VS Mediascope Publicitas (India) Pvt. Ltd. - 2017 Supreme(Bom) 1608 - 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 1608.
This flexibility aligns with the NI Act's goal of expeditious trials while upholding CrPC safeguards.
In summary, the purpose of Section 202 CrPC in criminal trials is to ensure procedural fairness and efficiency, particularly in cross-jurisdictional NI Act matters. By mandating a preliminary inquiry, it prevents harassment of outstation accused and filters meritless claims, as reinforced by Supreme Court directives Shivshankar Shrikrushna Dhole VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay (2021)Vishwakalyan Multistate Credit Co Op Society Ltd. VS Oneup Entertainment Private Limited - Supreme Court (2023)Usha Agarwalla VS Citicorp Finance (I) Ltd. - Calcutta (2023).
For businesses and individuals facing cheque bounce issues, understanding this provision can significantly impact case outcomes. This post synthesizes general legal principles—seek professional advice tailored to your situation.
#Section202CrPC, #NIAct138, #ChequeBounceLaw
Act, wherever it is found that any accused is resident of the area beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the magistrate concerned, an inquiry shall be conducted by the magistrate to arrive at sufficient grounds to proceed against the accused as prescribed under Section 202 of Cr.P.C. ... After hearing learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that since inquiry as stipu....
SCC Online SC 325 has been pleased to hold that in a case where the accused resides beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the court, it is mandatory for the Magistrate to cause an inquiry under Section 202 of the Cr.P.C. ... The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate transferred the case to the Metropolitan Magistrate, 16th Court, Kolkata who issued process against the accused persons under Section 200 of the #HL....
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be issued without making any inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or not. ... under Section 202 of the Cr.P.C. ... Secondly, in the 25 petition of complaint it was not stated that the petitioner resides outside the jurisdiction of the learned Magistrate. ... The address of the #....
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be issued without making any inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or not. ... The address of the accused No.4/petitioner recorded in the complaint is within the jurisdiction of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Kolkata. ... The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate transferred the case to the Metropolitan Magistrate, 16th ....
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be issued without making any inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or not. ... resident of Ahmedabad in the State of Gujarat. ... resident of Ahmedabad in the State of Gujarat. ... resident of Ahmedabad in the State of Gujarat.
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be issued without making any inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or not. ... resident of Ahmedabad in the State of Gujarat. ... resident of Ahmedabad in the State of Gujarat. ... resident of Ahmedabad in the State of Gujarat.
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be issued without making any inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or not. ... The address of the accused No.4/petitioner recorded in the complaint is within the jurisdiction of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Kolkata. ... The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate transferred the case to the Metropolitan Magistrate, 16th ....
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be issued without making any inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or not. ... The address of the accused No.4/petitioner recorded in the complaint is within the jurisdiction of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Kolkata. ... The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate transferred the case to the Metropolitan Magistrate, 16th ....
At that stage, the respondents-accused raised an objection on the ground that though some of the accused were residing at a place beyond the area covered by the jurisdiction of the learned Magistrate, the mandatory requirement of Section 202(1) of CRPC was not followed. ... As the mandatory requirement of sub section 1 of Section 202 of the C....
Thus, as per Section 145(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the evidence of complainant may be given by him on affidavit, and for summoning of accused under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, recording of statements under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C., is not required. ... under Section 202 of Cr.P.C., rather can itself advert to the documents and evidence by way....
3 While conducting any such inquiry under section 202 of Cr.P.C, the evidence of witnesses on behalf of the complainant shall be permitted to be taken on affidavit. In suitable cases, the magistrate may restrict the inquiry to examination of documents without insisting for examination of witnesses for satisfaction as to the sufficiency of grounds for proceeding under the said provision". "2 On receipt of any complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Act, wherever it is found that any accus....
1 is not resident of jurisdiction of concerned Magistrate, the report under Section 202 of Code of Criminal Procedure was called. 5. It appears that after the complaint was filed, verification has been recorded, when it was found that accused No.
After the report was submitted, at that time also, it appears that the learned Magistrate was not satisfied and directed the complainant to lead further evidence. Initially, when it was found that some of the accused were not resident of the jurisdiction of the learned Magistrate, he had directed the enquiry under Section 202 of the Cr.P.C. Even if for the sake arguments, it is accepted that the marriage between complainant and accused no.01 is subsisting, what is more releva....
It is argued that the trial Court has not conducted an inquiry within the purview of Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court has recorded the verification statement of the complainant as well as considered the affidavit filed by the complainant and, thereafter, issued the process. Complainant filed affidavit in support of allegations made in the complaint and also filed ROC record and after going through the record of the case, the complaint satisfies the requisite ingredients....
Inquiry under s. 202 of CrPC—Mandatory where accused resides beyond territorial jurisdiction 79
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
