Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Courts have recalled or quashed NBWs if they were issued without proper satisfaction that the accused was evading arrest or if the accused was not served or appeared voluntarily ["Suraj Srinivasan D. v. Drug Inspector Chennai - Madras"], ["DASRATH ALIAS DASHRAT Vs STATE OF PUNJAB - Punjab and Haryana"], ["Dr.vinay Rai vs State Of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh"].
Can an accused absconding abroad seek quashing of FIR?
However, mere absence abroad, especially if the court has evidence of intentional evasion, does not automatically entitle the accused to quash FIR; procedural irregularities must be established ["Sandeep Saw @ Sandeep Kumar, S/o Daleshwar Sao vs State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["Ritesh Roshan @ Ritesh Singh VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"]- ["M.L. Paliwal Son Of Shri Deep Chand Paliwal vs Union Of India - Rajasthan"]- ["JASWINDER PAL Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["SUKHDEV SINGH Vs STATE OF HARYANA - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["SUNIL KUMAR Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["Suraj Srinivasan D. v. Drug Inspector Chennai - Madras"]- ["Sandeep Saw @ Sandeep Kumar, S/o Daleshwar Sao vs State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"]- ["V. G. K. Senthilnathan VS The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu Police Head Quarters & Others - Madras"]- ["V. G. K. Senthilnathan VS The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu Police Head Quarters & Others - Madras"]
In the complex world of criminal law, facing charges under Section 420 IPC for cheating can be daunting, especially when a non-bailable warrant (NBW) has been issued and the accused has left the country to avoid proceedings. A pressing question arises: whether an accused in a criminal cheating case, against whom court already issued a non-bailable warrant, and absconded to a foreign country to evade court proceedings can seek quashing of FIR?
This blog post delves into the legal nuances, drawing from established judicial precedents. While courts may entertain such petitions under Section 482 CrPC, success hinges on exceptional circumstances. Note: This is general information based on case law and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Indian courts possess inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) to quash FIRs, but this is exercised sparingly. The primary test is whether the FIR, taken at face value, discloses a cognizable offence. As held in key judgments, courts intervene only in limited cases where allegations do not prima facie constitute an offence or continuing proceedings would abuse the process of law Anandan R., S/o. Raghavan S vs State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2528Kuldeep Yadav VS State Of U. P. - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1860.
Mere allegations lacking fraudulent intent—essential for cheating under Section 415/420 IPC—may warrant quashing. The essence of the offence of cheating under Section 415 IPC is the fraudulent intention at the time of the transaction, and a mere breach of contract does not constitute cheating unless such intention is established Anandan R., S/o. Raghavan S vs State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2528.
An NBW signals serious concerns, often issued when summons or bailable warrants fail, particularly if the accused is likely to evade law or tamper with evidence P.C. Purohit Son Of Late Shri Shankarlal Purohit vs Union Of India, Through The Senior Intelligence Officer, Dggi, Jzu, Jaipur, (Uoi). - 2025 Supreme(Raj) 1527. However, NBWs are not issued lightly: Non-bailable warrant should be issued to bring a person to court when summons or bailable warrants would be unlikely to have the desired result P.C. Purohit Son Of Late Shri Shankarlal Purohit vs Union Of India, Through The Senior Intelligence Officer, Dggi, Jzu, Jaipur, (Uoi). - 2025 Supreme(Raj) 1527.
For an absconding accused in a foreign country, seeking quashing adds layers of complexity. Courts have quashed NBWs in cases of cooperation, converting them to bailable ones, emphasizing presumption of innocence until proven guilty P.C. Purohit Son Of Late Shri Shankarlal Purohit vs Union Of India, Through The Senior Intelligence Officer, Dggi, Jzu, Jaipur, (Uoi). - 2025 Supreme(Raj) 1527. Yet, persistent evasion can undermine petitions. In one case involving GST evasion, NBWs were quashed as the accused showed willingness to comply, highlighting that non-bailable warrants should not be issued without considering the accused's willingness to appear and the absence of evidence suggesting evasion or tampering P.C. Purohit Son Of Late Shri Shankarlal Purohit vs Union Of India, Through The Senior Intelligence Officer, Dggi, Jzu, Jaipur, (Uoi). - 2025 Supreme(Raj) 1527.
Conversely, if the accused avoids investigation despite opportunities, courts uphold NBWs: Non-bailable warrants can be issued for procuring attendance of a person before the court, and on police remand being granted, investigation can be carried out from such accused J. S. Bhatia VS CBI - 2011 Supreme(Del) 242. Absconding to evade proceedings may portray the accused as unwilling to face justice, potentially weakening a quashing plea State through the Idol Wing Crime Investigation Department VS Subash Chandra Kapoor, Represented by Sushma Rani Sareen - 2012 Supreme(Mad) 2092.
Even with an NBW and foreign abscondence, quashing remains possible if:- No Prima Facie Offence: Allegations must show fraudulent intent from inception. Vague, false, or civil-dispute-like claims (e.g., breach of contract) justify quashing Kuldeep Yadav VS State Of U. P. - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1860Sharda Prasad VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1497.- Frivolous or Malicious FIR: If based on insufficient facts, courts quash to prevent abuse Kuldeep Yadav VS State Of U. P. - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1860.- Courts Avoid Veracity Test: At quashing stage, allegations are accepted at face value; only if they fail to disclose a cognizable offence is relief granted R. K. Lalwani VS State of Madhya Pradesh - 2022 0 Supreme(MP) 1248.
In cheating scenarios, courts distinguish criminal fraud from civil wrongs: Allegations suggesting a contractual dispute without fraudulent intent do not amount to cheating and can be grounds for quashing Anandan R., S/o. Raghavan S vs State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2528. However, clear fraudulent schemes bar quashing Kuldeep Yadav VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad (2023).
Absconding raises red flags. In a theft case with an accused in a foreign country and pending extradition, recall of NBW was set aside: So long as the proceeding initiated under the Extradition Act is pending, it would not be appropriate for the learned Magistrate to recall the Non Bailable Warrant issued to secure his presence State through the Idol Wing Crime Investigation Department VS Subash Chandra Kapoor, Represented by Sushma Rani Sareen - 2012 Supreme(Mad) 2092. Courts consider factors like gravity of offence, role of accused, abscondence risk, and custodial interrogation needs State through the Idol Wing Crime Investigation Department VS Subash Chandra Kapoor, Represented by Sushma Rani Sareen - 2012 Supreme(Mad) 2092.
Petitions under Section 482 CrPC can still be filed from abroad, but personal appearance or strong grounds (e.g., no prima facie case) are crucial. Bail cancellation post-NBW for absconders shows judicial caution Palanivel VS State, Represented by Inspector of Police, Veeranam Police Station, Salem - 2019 Supreme(Mad) 1126.
Courts stress: The power to quash is not to be used as a tool to stifle genuine criminal proceedings but only when the FIR is evidently baseless or legally unsustainable R. K. Lalwani VS State of Madhya Pradesh - 2022 0 Supreme(MP) 1248.
If facing such a scenario:- Demonstrate Weak FIR: File under Section 482 CrPC showing no prima facie offence or frivolous claims.- Address NBW: Seek recall by proving cooperation; courts prefer bailable alternatives initially P.C. Purohit Son Of Late Shri Shankarlal Purohit vs Union Of India, Through The Senior Intelligence Officer, Dggi, Jzu, Jaipur, (Uoi). - 2025 Supreme(Raj) 1527.- Early Action: Petition at nascent stage; avoid prolonging via abscondence, as it invites stricter scrutiny.- Seek Bail Post-Quashing: If FIR survives, explore bail, mindful of superior court orders Palanivel VS State, Represented by Inspector of Police, Veeranam Police Station, Salem - 2019 Supreme(Mad) 1126.
An absconding accused in a cheating case can seek quashing of the FIR, but relief is rare and demands exceptional proof that allegations lack prima facie criminality Anandan R., S/o. Raghavan S vs State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2528Kuldeep Yadav VS State Of U. P. - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1860. NBWs and foreign evasion complicate matters, signaling potential non-cooperation, yet do not absolutely bar jurisdiction if merits favor quashing.
Key Takeaways:- Focus on fraudulent intent absence for cheating claims.- NBWs quashable if no evasion risk P.C. Purohit Son Of Late Shri Shankarlal Purohit vs Union Of India, Through The Senior Intelligence Officer, Dggi, Jzu, Jaipur, (Uoi). - 2025 Supreme(Raj) 1527.- Courts exercise Section 482 powers cautiously to protect genuine probes.
Stay informed, act promptly, and prioritize legal counsel. Judicial trends favor justice over technicalities, but evasion rarely helps.
References:- Anandan R., S/o. Raghavan S vs State Of Kerala, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2528, Kuldeep Yadav VS State Of U. P. - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1860, Sharda Prasad VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1497, R. K. Lalwani VS State of Madhya Pradesh - 2022 0 Supreme(MP) 1248, P.C. Purohit Son Of Late Shri Shankarlal Purohit vs Union Of India, Through The Senior Intelligence Officer, Dggi, Jzu, Jaipur, (Uoi). - 2025 Supreme(Raj) 1527, J. S. Bhatia VS CBI - 2011 Supreme(Del) 242, Palanivel VS State, Represented by Inspector of Police, Veeranam Police Station, Salem - 2019 Supreme(Mad) 1126, Sathyamarty @ Padma VS State Represented by: The Deputy Superintendent of Police - 2019 Supreme(Mad) 843, Himanshu @ Hemant Rajendra Bhatt VS State of Maharashtra - 2014 Supreme(Bom) 1021, State through the Idol Wing Crime Investigation Department VS Subash Chandra Kapoor, Represented by Sushma Rani Sareen - 2012 Supreme(Mad) 2092, Sriram Sampath VS State Represented by Commissioner of Police Chennai & Others - 2010 Supreme(Mad) 1117
#QuashingFIR, #CriminalLawIndia, #CheatingCase
Penal Code hence, issued the non-bailable warrant of arrest under Section 73 Cr.P.C. ... Case No. 1869 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 469 and 471 and also prayed for quashing of the order dated 28.11.2022 passed by the said court in that case; by which the non-bailable warrant of arrest was issued inter alia against the petitioners an....
Criminal Misc.Petition No. 6137/2024 to the extent of quashing the non- bailable warrants. ... Non-bailable warrant should be issued to bring a person to court when summons or bailable warrants would be unlikely to have the desired result.” ... However, if a warrant of arrest has been issued on account of non-appearance or proceedings under Sec....
Criminal Misc.Petition No. 6137/2024 to the extent of quashing the non- bailable warrants. ... Non-bailable warrant should be issued to bring a person to court when summons or bailable warrants would be unlikely to have the desired result.” ... However, if a warrant of arrest has been issued on account of non-appearance or proceedings under Sec....
In number of cases, this Court has been experiencing the situation wherein, accused stopped appearing before trial Court in the criminal cases after being released on bail and thereby compelling the Court to issue non-bailable warrants by cancelling the bail already granted or such accused has been declared ... Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Patiala, whereby non-bailable warrants have be....
Similarly, without receiving the execution report of the bailable warrant of arrest, non-bailable warrant of arrest was issued against the petitioner illegally, as the learned Magistrate ought not have issued the non-bailable warrant of arrest, before receipt of the execution report of the bailable warrant ... P.P. on the other hand opposes the prayer to quash the said five order....
This petition seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 15.10.2022 passed by the Special Judge (POCSO Court), Allahabad, whereby non-bailable warrant has been issued against the petitioner in F.I.R. ... After examining the aforesaid and also going through the case diary, the Special Court (POCSO Court) has issued non-bailable....
This petition seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 15.10.2022 passed by the Special Judge (POCSO Court), Allahabad, whereby non-bailable warrant has been issued against the petitioner in F.I.R. ... After examining the aforesaid and also going through the case diary, the Special Court (POCSO Court) has issued non-bailable....
By the present petition the Petitioner seeks quashing of non-bailable warrants dated 8th March, 2011 passed by the learned Special Judge, CBI against the Petitioner in case FIR No. ... ... Thus, non-bailable warrants can be issued for procuring attendance of a person before the Court and on police remand being granted investigation can be carried out from such accused. ... The learned counsel further submitted tha....
Nos.652 and 130 of 2006 on the file of JM-I, Tiruppur, seek to execute the Non-Bailable Warrants issued against the accused concerned. ... 3. ... ... (1) If Any court has reason to believe (whether after taking evidence or not) that any person against whom a warrant has been issued by it has absconded or is concealing himself so that such warrant cannot be executed, such court....
Nos.652 and 130 of 2006 on the file of JM-I, Tiruppur, seek to execute the Non-Bailable Warrants issued against the accused concerned. ... 3. ... ... (1) If Any court has reason to believe (whether after taking evidence or not) that any person against whom a warrant has been issued by it has absconded or is concealing himself so that such warrant cannot be executed, such court ....
Three important questions that arises for consideration in this case are; (a) When an accused person is on bail and he fails to appear before the trial Court resulting in a non-bailable warrant issued against him and the accused gets arrested in another case and he is produced before the trial Court through the PT warrant, in execution of the non-bailable warrant, whether the PT warrant can be converted into a regular warrant and the accused person can be remanded to custody? (b) Whether the bail granted by this Court can be cancelled by a Subordinate Court on the ground of....
The copies of the charge sheet were given to the accused on 14.07.2003. In this case, the appellant was arrested on 24.11.2002. Two PVC Pipe Bombs with match box were recovered from her possession. The Court below issued a Non bailable warrant against the absconded accused and some were secured later.
Non-bailable warrant issued under section 204 in non-bailable offences as per the settled position can be challenged under section 438 of Cr. P.C. and the person against whom such warrant is issued may seek a pre-arrest protection under section 438 of the Code. The order of warrant of arrest while issuing process under section 204 of the Code is one of such circumstances when a Court may issue warrant. However, considering the object and spirit of power of warrant conferred upon the Magistrate, I am of the view that in all the orders of non-bailable warrant even in non-bail....
A perusal of the Section 70(2) of the Criminal Procedure code would show that the person concered against whom the non-bailable warrant issued will have to approach the said Court and seek cancellation of the warrant issued. Therefore, the petitioner is given liberty to approach the learned Judicial Magistrate, Jeyankondam, seeking recall and cancellation of non bailable warrant issued on 25.11.2011. An accused, who is facing a Non Bailable Warrant for his arrest may be put in either one of the following categories, viz., (i) an accused who has been already on bai....
In the decision first cited, the Court was dealing with a case of an absconding accused against whom a Non-bailable Warrant was pending. The contention regarding the petitioner having not subjected himself to the jurisdiction of this Court and by placing reliance on decisions in Iqbal Mohammed Memon v. The State of Maharashtra 1996(1) Crimes 383 (H.C.) and Shafi and another v. State of Kerala 2003 Crl.L.J.3612 is unfounded.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
