Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Analysis and ConclusionRash/negligent driving accusations (e.g., IPC 279/304A) do not inherently bar govt bank job appointment; acquittal clears path, mere FIR insufficient without moral turpitude review ["Umesh Kumar Dhuwan vs Home Affairs - Central Administrative Tribunal"]. Existing govt drivers retained post-acquittal ["State of H.P. vs Subhash Chand - Himachal Pradesh"]. Pending cases may trigger verification scrutiny but lack automatic disqualification if disclosed; resolution (esp. acquittal) recommended to avoid hurdles ["Umesh Kumar Dhuwan vs Home Affairs - Central Administrative Tribunal"] ["VISHNU K N Versus THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER - Kerala"].
Imagine this: You've aced the exams, cleared the interviews, and secured a spot in a prestigious government bank job. But there's a catch—a pending case for rash and negligent driving under Sections 279, 337, or 338 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). I was made an accused in a crime for rash and negligent driving. Now I have been selected for a government bank job. Does the crime stand in the way of my appointment? This is a common worry for many aspirants. The good news? Typically, no—it doesn't automatically bar your appointment. This post breaks down the legal landscape, drawing from key court judgments and principles like presumption of innocence and the right to livelihood under Article 21 of the Constitution.
We'll explore why minor traffic offences like these rarely derail public sector careers, especially for non-safety-sensitive roles like bank jobs, while distinguishing them from graver cases.
A pending case for rash and negligent driving generally has no disqualifying impact on appointment to a government bank job in India. These are compoundable, minor offences not involving moral turpitude. Mere pendency doesn't imply guilt, upholding the presumption of innocence and your right to livelihood. Even a prior conviction via plea of guilt or compromise (with a fine) in solitary instances doesn't bar selection, as courts have ruled in analogous public sector cases. Employers must appoint selected candidates absent legal prohibitions, differentiating from serious offences like Section 304A IPC (causing death by negligence).Jaipur City Transport Services Ltd. VS Ramveer Singh - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1292
Courts consistently protect candidates with minor traffic convictions. In selections for driver posts at Jaipur City Transport Services Limited (JCTSL), denials based on prior rash driving pleas were quashed. One ruling stated: conviction for the alleged offence of rash & negligent driving cannot in itself constitute a ground to non-suit the candidate in seeking public employment who has been finally selected... it is not a case of moral turpitude.Jaipur City Transport Services Ltd. VS Ramveer Singh - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1292 The court emphasized it was a solitary case with fine paid post-plea.Jaipur City Transport Services Ltd. VS Ramveer Singh - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1292
Another held: the non-appointment of the petitioner despite his selection... is wholly illegal... conviction... for minor traffic offences... does not entail any conviction for an offence involving moral turpitude.Vijay Pal Yadav S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Yadav VS Jaipur City Transport Services Ltd. - 2017 0 Supreme(Raj) 655
These apply by analogy to bank jobs—no stricter bank rules exist, and banks are less vehicle-sensitive than PSUs.
Pending matters carry even less weight. In a Technical Helper selection, denial over pending IPC 447/323 cases was overturned: mere pendency of a criminal case was arbitrary... presumption of innocence applies until a conviction is made... mere involvement... should not disqualify.Ranveer Kumar S/o Shri Raja Ram VS Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. - 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 291 Rash driving (compoundable) fits as minor, lacking moral turpitude.Ranveer Kumar S/o Shri Raja Ram VS Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. - 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 291
Contrast with Section 304A: in the matters where one has been charged... u/S.304-A IPC and after having been tried, and held guilty certainly its a serious matter, but pending 279/337/338 cases lack this gravity.Jaipur City Transport Services Ltd. VS Ramveer Singh - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1292 Other cases highlight 304A's severity, like convictions for rash driving causing child deaths, where sentences were upheld or modified but guilt proven beyond doubt—far from minor pendency.Krishnadeo Singh VS State Of M. P. - 2016 Supreme(MP) 1185Bandi Appana VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2024 Supreme(AP) 1427
Post-selection denial violates Article 21: The right to livelihood falls within the ambit of Article 21... It cannot be denied to a selectee without a good cause.Vijay Pal Yadav S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Yadav VS Jaipur City Transport Services Ltd. - 2017 0 Supreme(Raj) 655 Police certificates noting minor cases still affirm good character.Vijay Pal Yadav S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Yadav VS Jaipur City Transport Services Ltd. - 2017 0 Supreme(Raj) 655
While minor cases are safe, watch for:
Motor accident claims reinforce rash driving's proof on preponderance of probabilities, not criminal standards, underscoring minor cases' low bar.Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Anjali - 2023 Supreme(Del) 2284
In summary, a pending or solitary rash driving case typically won't block your government bank job. Courts prioritize innocence presumption, livelihood, and fairness over minor traffic slips. Always consult a lawyer for your specifics—this is general info, not advice. Stay informed, disclose honestly, and focus on your achievement!
Key Takeaways:- Minor IPC 279/337/338: No bar, even convicted (solitary).- Pending: Fully protected.- Avoid suppression; challenge arbitrary denials.
References include Jaipur City Transport Services Ltd. VS Ramveer Singh - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1292, Vijay Pal Yadav S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Yadav VS Jaipur City Transport Services Ltd. - 2017 0 Supreme(Raj) 655, Ranveer Kumar S/o Shri Raja Ram VS Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. - 2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 291, Nagen Baruah VS Assam State Transport Corpn. - 2007 0 Supreme(Gau) 35, with contrasts from Krishnadeo Singh VS State Of M. P. - 2016 Supreme(MP) 1185, Bandi Appana VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2024 Supreme(AP) 1427, [Surinder Singh VS State Of Punjab - 2020 Supreme(P&H) 299).
#RashDrivingCase, #GovtBankJob, #LegalIndia
vehicle in a rash and negligent manner and endangered human life. ... The evidence of both the said witnesses does not prove that the accused Umesh was the driver of the vehicle RJ 23 CC 4138 and that he drove the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner. ... Significantly, the Trial Court has recorded a categorical finding that the prosecution failed to establish the applicant’s rash or negligent driving or even his identity as the driver of the offe....
In Ext.P6, the 4th respondent concluded that the petitioner had driven the vehicle in a very rash and negligent manner. It is the negligence of the petitioner which contributed to the death of a scooterist. ... Crime No.1503/2023 has been registered in Hill Palace Police Station arraying the petitioner as 2nd accused, for offences punishable under Section 379 and 304A IPC. 3. ... It is true that the negligent driving by the petitioner has contributed to loss of life. However, the degre....
(2000) 5 SCC 82 ] that the Probation of Offenders Act cannot be invoked in cases involving rash or negligent driving of the bus resulting in death of human beings.” ... Therefore, in view of these binding precedents, it is not permissible to grant the benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act in an offence involving rash and negligent driving. Hence this prayer is rejected and the application is dismissed. ... Learned counsel lastly made an alternative plea that the P....
to Rs. 20,000/-, where the accused caused death of a 7 years old girl on account of his rash and negligent driving tractor. ... From perusal of statement of prosecution witnesses and post-mortem report of deceased, it stands proved that the jeep driven by the accused/applicant had hit the deceased and further that the applicant was driving it in a rash and negligent manner and caused the death of deceased Tarun Singh. ... It bears i....
But, due to the fatal injuries, the deceased Sivakumar died on the way to the Bangalore Hospital. Postmortem has conducted at Government Hospital, Krishnagiri on 03.05.2005. The accident occurred only due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the said TNSTC Bus. ... In future, he might get a Government job and look after the petitioners. ... 6. ... On scrutiny of Ex.A1-FIR, it clearly shows that the accident happened due to the rash and....
On the other hand, learned counsel representing the 2nd respondent-Sri.Shivarja S Ballolli would vehemently refute the submissions made and would contend that the job of the petitioner ... State of 9 Maharashtra [(1968) 2 SCR 515] the accused who was driving a car only with a learner's death is caused due to a negligent act. ... Section 304-A reads into two parts first part relates to causing death of any person by any rash act of the accused and the second....
The accident has occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the lorry. ... It was further pleaded that the accident was due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the bus. The manner of accident, avocation, and income of the deceased was also denied. ... The Claims Tribunal, by the impugned judgment, inter alia, held that the accident took place on account of rash and negligent driving#HL_EN....
PWs. 1 and 2 categorically deposed about the manner of the incident, rash and negligent driving of the driver of the crime auto that on 11.03.2008 at about 04.00 p.m. while the deceased crossing the road, the accused drove the crime auto in a rash and negligent manner without blowing horn and dashed ... As such, this Court can rely upon Ex.P.7 postmortem report as substantive piece of evidence and come to conclusion that the deceased died due to the ....
The mode and manner of proving the rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle has also been considered in various other judgments and has held that the onus to prove the rash and negligent driving is not to be discharged beyond doubt or in the similar manner as a fact is to be proved in a civil ... Shivam Sharma suffered fatal injuries due to rash and negligent driving of the insured vehicle being DL-3CB-1162. The said find....
3.4 A case in Crime No.28 of 2016 was registered at Pulkal Police Station against the driver of the crime vehicle. The accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the crime vehicle. ... The Tribunal framed the following issues: 1) Whether the death of deceased occurred in the motor accident due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the crime vehicle? ... The evidence of PW1, P....
It is alleged that at about 5.00 p.m. the motor cycle was dashed by the truck bearing registration No. MH-17-AG-8406, on account of said accident, deceased had suffered fatal injuries. Crime was registered against truck driver for rash and negligent driving and under other sections of Indian Penal Code.
The crime was registered against the driver of the Fiat Car for rash and negligent driving.
Hence, a claim petition restricted to a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- has been filed by the claimant against the insurer of the offending bus and owner of the bus. He took treatment for 43 days as inpatient and thereafter, discharged on 05.04.2000 with a direction to undergo Physiotherapy daily. Alleging that due to the injury sustained in the road accident, he has become semi-paralyzed, unable to carry on his day-today work without assistance and he is not able to write or continue his occupation as bus driver, therefore, the accident has caused immeasurable and incalculable loss. (ii) A c....
The roads are proving to be killing grounds for the reasons that many vehicle drivers drive thereon in a dare devil manner throwing caution to the winds, not caring for safety and security of the other commuters on the road and such type of elements have to be dealt with sternly otherwise there would be more instances of casualties due to road side accidents. I on my part feel that the accused by rash and negligent driving of the car had caused death of a middle aged person. In this case, no leniency can be shown to the accused-convict.
Whereas, I am not inclined to accede to that request. I on my part feel that the accused by rash and negligent driving of the truck had caused death of a human being. The roads are proving to be killing grounds for the reasons that many vehicle drivers drive thereon in a dare devil manner throwing caution to the winds, not caring for safety and security of the other commuters on the road and such type of elements have to be dealt with sternly otherwise there would be more instances of causalities due to road side accidents. In this case, no leniency can be shown to the accu....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
