Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Rashid Ali Beg's case (2022 SCC 414) clarified that disputes related to Wakf properties fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Wakf Tribunal and not civil courts, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory language ["Ram Lakhan VS Adnan Farukh - Allahabad"], ["M. A. Rahman VS State of Telangana - Telangana"], ["Telangana State Waqf Board VS Solithro Private Limited, Rep. By its Director - Telangana"], ["Mohammed Shahid S/o Mohammed Isaaq vs Lenin, S/o Dhatchanmoorthy - Madras"].
The Supreme Court in Rashid Wali Beg emphasized that courts cannot override the clear language of the Wakf Act, 1995, and must respect the statutory scheme, especially regarding jurisdiction and procedural matters ["Ram Lakhan VS Adnan Farukh - Allahabad"], ["M. A. Rahman VS State of Telangana - Telangana"], ["Telangana State Waqf Board VS Solithro Private Limited, Rep. By its Director - Telangana"].
Several judgments, including those involving Wakf Boards from different states (e.g., Bihar, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, West Bengal), reference Rashid Ali Beg to reinforce that disputes concerning Wakf properties or appointment of Mutawallis are to be resolved by the Wakf Tribunal, not civil courts or other forums ["Ram Lakhan VS Adnan Farukh - Allahabad"], ["M. A. Rahman VS State of Telangana - Telangana"], ["Telangana State Waqf Board VS Solithro Private Limited, Rep. By its Director - Telangana"], ["Mohammed Shahid S/o Mohammed Isaaq vs Lenin, S/o Dhatchanmoorthy - Madras"].
The judgment also discusses that the Wakf Boards are statutory authorities with responsibilities to safeguard Wakf interests under the Wakf Act, and their decisions, especially regarding appointment of Mutawallis, are subject to judicial review primarily within the framework of the Wakf Tribunal ["M. A. Rahman VS State of Telangana - Telangana"], ["Ram Lakhan VS Adnan Farukh - Allahabad"].
Several cases highlight that courts must interpret the Wakf Act's provisions, including Sections 32 and 83, in accordance with the statutory language, and cannot impose their own interpretations that conflict with explicit statutory mandates ["Ram Lakhan VS Adnan Farukh - Allahabad"], ["M. A. Rahman VS State of Telangana - Telangana"].
The Supreme Court in Rashid Wali Beg also distinguished earlier decisions (e.g., Sugra Humayun Mirza Wakf, Anis Fatma Begum) and clarified that they do not override the statutory provisions and jurisdictional rules laid down in the Wakf Act ["Ram Lakhan VS Adnan Farukh - Allahabad"], ["M. A. Rahman VS State of Telangana - Telangana"].
Analysis and Conclusion:The 2021 judgment in Rashid Ali against the Wakf Board reaffirmed the principle that disputes over Wakf properties and appointment of Mutawallis are exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Wakf Tribunal, and courts must strictly follow the statutory language of the Wakf Act. The judgment underscores the importance of respecting statutory boundaries and clarifies that courts cannot substitute their interpretation for the clear provisions of the law, thus reinforcing the authority of Wakf Tribunals in such matters ["Ram Lakhan VS Adnan Farukh - Allahabad"], ["M. A. Rahman VS State of Telangana - Telangana"].
In the complex landscape of Indian property law, disputes involving waqf properties often hinge on jurisdictional questions between civil courts and specialized Waqf Tribunals. A common query arises: Rashid Ali against wakf board judgment in 2021. While no exact judgment matches this title, closely related cases like Rashid Ali Molla v. Board of Wakfs (2019) and Kiran Devi v. Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board (2021) provide critical insights into Waqf Tribunal powers, especially over eviction and tenancy issues post the 2013 amendment to the Waqf Act. This post breaks down these rulings, their implications, and broader context from recent cases. Note: This is general information, not legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for specific matters.
Waqf Tribunals, established under Section 83 of the Waqf Act, 1995, hold broad authority to resolve any dispute, question, or matter relating to a waqf or waqf propertyMumtaz Yarud Dowla Wakf VS M/s Badam Balakrishna Hotel Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 7 Supreme 733. This includes eviction of tenants and determining lessor-lessee rights, a scope expanded by Amendment Act 27 of 2013. Section 85 bars civil courts from entertaining such suits, prioritizing Tribunal exclusivity.
Pre-amendment, cases like Ramesh Gobindram restricted Tribunal powers, but post-2013, the Supreme Court in Rashid Wali Beg (Supra) clarified: the basis of Ramesh Gobindram now stands removed through Amendment Act 27 of 2013 Mumtaz Yarud Dowla Wakf VS M/s Badam Balakrishna Hotel Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 7 Supreme 733. Even non-Muslims or aggrieved parties can approach the Tribunal for admitted waqf properties.
Though from 2019, this Calcutta High Court ruling is pivotal for queries like Rashid Ali vs Waqf Board. The court held the Tribunal has jurisdiction beyond Sections 52 or 54, extending to eviction as a consequence of determining waqf nature. As noted: the tribunal had ample jurisdiction to take the consequential issue of eviction as well, not merely under Sections 52 or 54 of the Waqf Act but in the sense that such recovery was a fall-out of the negation of the petitioner's right pertaining to the nature of waqf Harmeet Kaur VS Abeda Khatoon - 2020 0 Supreme(Cal) 53.
This rejects civil court exclusivity, affirming Tribunals for waqf eviction suits against Boards Harmeet Kaur VS Abeda Khatoon - 2020 0 Supreme(Cal) 53.
Directly addressing a challenge against a Sunni Waqf Board, the Supreme Court in (2021) 15 SCC 15 refused to apply restrictive precedents where suits transferred from civil courts to Tribunals attained finality. It stated: after allowing the order of transfer to attain finality, it was not open to them to resurrect the issue through Ramesh Gobindram Mumtaz Yarud Dowla Wakf VS M/s Badam Balakrishna Hotel Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 7 Supreme 733.
This reinforces Tribunal primacy, especially when waqf status is undisputed Mumtaz Yarud Dowla Wakf VS M/s Badam Balakrishna Hotel Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 7 Supreme 733.
In Rashid Wali Beg v. Farid Pindari (2021, CDJ 2021 SC 908), the Supreme Court approved prior rulings, holding Tribunals cover eviction of a tenant or determination of the rights and obligation of the lessor and lessee post-2013 Mumtaz Yarud Dowla Wakf VS M/s Badam Balakrishna Hotel Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 7 Supreme 733Mohammed Akif Safvan VS State of Telangana - 2023 Supreme(Telangana) 613. It emphasized: Waqf Act prevails over state tenancy laws for waqf properties, though tenancy protections may interplay if specially enacted Anis Fatma Begum VS Debasish Ghosh - 2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 1353.
Waqf Board actions often spark litigation, as seen in cases challenging committee appointments or mutawalli roles. For instance, in a 2023 writ, the court set aside a Board's recall of a managing committee under Section 67, ruling it violated natural justice: The Waqf Board acted without jurisdiction in recalling the managing committee's appointment, violating statutory procedures and principles of natural justiceCommittee of Management Waqf No. 856, Moradabad (Now Amroha) VS State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 1574. The Board must issue notice and reasoned orders.
Similarly, in Telangana cases, courts scrutinized mutawalli appointments under Section 42. One upheld a Board's recognition of services based on inquiry reports: The Board has the power to appoint a Mutawalli under Section 42 of the Wakf Act, 1954, when there is a vacancyMir Faiyaz Ali VS State of Telangana - 2023 Supreme(Telangana) 567. Another quashed politically influenced committee formations, directing fresh appointments per regulations Mohammed Akif Safvan VS State of Telangana - 2023 Supreme(Telangana) 613.
Civil court bars persist: Civil courts lack jurisdiction over disputes involving Wakf properties as per the WAKF ACT, sections 83 and 85Masid-e-Makkapur and Madrasa-e Bilal Wakf Committee, Rep. by its President/Muthavalli, Mohammed Amjed Hussain vs D. Sasikumar - 2024 Supreme(Mad) 2463. In title suits, plaintiffs must prove ownership; adverse possession can defeat waqf claims if established since pre-1954 Angara Mosque, Rep. by its Mutavalli, Md. Madina Khan, Angara, Ramachandrapuram vs Sreenivasa Rice Mill, West Ghandrika, Rep. by its Partners - 2025 Supreme(AP) 108.
Tenancy acts (e.g., West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997) may protect tenants, but Section 83(1) empowers the Tribunal to entertain eviction of tenantAnis Fatma Begum VS Debasish Ghosh - 2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 1353. Courts note: whether the same is in exclusion of the tenants who comes within the domain of the rent/tenancy legislation or not, was neither an issue before Apex CourtAnis Fatma Begum VS Debasish Ghosh - 2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 1353. Waqf Act typically prevails.
Exceptions include:- Pre-2013 cases or non-final transfers allowing civil claims Mumtaz Yarud Dowla Wakf VS M/s Badam Balakrishna Hotel Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 7 Supreme 733.- Non-waqf disputes (e.g., unrelated easements) triable by civil courts Kausa Jama Masjid Trust Thr. Its Chief Trustee Haroon Qamrudin Raut vs Fashibai Bhagirath Bhagat - 2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 8081Kausa Jama Masjid Trust Thr. Its Chief Trustee Haroon Qamrudin Raut vs Fashibai Bhagirath Bhagat - 2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 6582.- Matters requiring exhausted remedies, with High Court appeals under Waqf Act Mumtaz Yarud Dowla Wakf VS M/s Badam Balakrishna Hotel Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 7 Supreme 733.
Res judicata applies if prior suits dismissed without appeal A. P State Wakf Board VS G. Prakasha Reddy - 2013 Supreme(AP) 661.
Understanding these nuances can guide waqf stakeholders. For tailored advice, seek professional legal counsel. Stay informed on evolving Waqf jurisprudence.
#WaqfLaw #TribunalJurisdiction #WaqfJudgments
Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board, (2021) 15 SCC 15], refused to apply the ratio of Ramesh Gobindram [Ramesh Gobindram v. ... The aforesaid appeal has been dismissed by judgment dated 11.8.2023, relying upon a judgment of Apex Court in case of Rashid Ali Beg v. Farid Pindari , 2022 (4) SCC 414 . ... Sugra Humayun Mirza Wakf, (2010) 8 SCC 726 (2010) 3 SCC (Civ) 553] was sought to be distinguished both in Anis Fatma Begum [W.B. Wakf #HL_S....
Judgment reported in 2022 (4) SCC page 414 (para 61) in Rashid Wali Beg v Farid Pindari and others. 2. Judgment dated 13th December, 2018 passed in W.P.No.44077 of 2018, in particular, para 6. ... b) As per Section 32 of Wakf Act, 1995, it is for the respondent Wakf Board to take all the precautions and measures to safeguard the interest of Wakf institutions and its managements and though the 2nd respondent has processed the application of the petitioner dated 16.07.....
Wajid Ali S/o Rashid Hussain Secretary 3. Mohammd Tayyab S/o Mohd. Yunus Treasurer 4. Mahir Hussain S/o Maqsood Hussain Member 5. Najim S/o Zaheer Ali Member 6. ... Aslam Hussain S/o Zaheer Ali President 2. Wajid Ali S/o Rashid Hussain Secretary 3. Mohammd Tayyab S/o Mohd. Yunus Treasurer 4. Mahir Hussain S/o Maqsood Hussain Member 5. ... The Wakf Board is a statutory authority established under the Act and is a “State” within the meaning of Article ....
No.18513 of 2021 is filed by Mir Jaffar Ali Moosavi Alias Mir Abbas Ali Moosavi challenging the action of respondent No.2 - Wakf Board in appointing respondent No.4 - Mir Hyder Ali Al Moosavi as Mutawalli of the Wakf Institution without considering his objections and representations dated 16.04.2021 ... Nos.1394 and 1392 of 2022 are filed by Mir Hyder Ali Moosavi challenging the common judgment dated 03.12.#HL_STAR....
iii) The judgment dated 28.10.2021 of the Apex Court reported in CDJ 2021 SC 908 in Rashid Wali Beg v Farid Pindari and others, in particular para 38 of the said judgment. ... Wakf Board, Hyderabad. ... ii) The judgment dated 23.11.2010 of the Apex Court reported in CDJ 2010 SC 1069 in Board of Wakf, West Bengal v Anis Fatma Begum and another, in particular para 10 of the said judgment. ... c) ....
Syed Jalal, (2017) 13 SCC 174, Rashid Wali Beg vs. Farid Pindari, (2022) 4 SCC 414, Sayeed Ali vs. Andhra Pradesh Wakf Board, (1998) 2 SCC 642, Telangana State Wakf Board vs. ... Board of Wakf, West Bengal vs. Anis Fatma Begum ((2010) 14 SCC 588) is again not a judgment arising out of a writ petition filed before the High Court. ... P.Radha Madhavi, W.A.No.318 of 2021 and Telangana State Wakf #HL_....
filed 20 documents to establish his right as mutawalli and filed several representations dated 27.11.2020, 14.02.2021, 25.02.2021, 16.06.2022, 27.11.2022, 03.11.2022, and 31.10.2022 to incorporate the petitioner’s name as hereditary mutawalli under Section 42 of the Wakf Act in the Wakf board and the ... A bare perusal of the detailed report dated 05.08.2021 of the Inspector Auditor Wakf, Ranga Reddy District addressed to the Chief Executive Officer, Telangana State #....
The Chairman Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board, 2nd Floor, Haj Bhawan, Harding Road, Ali Imam Path, Police Station- Sachivalya, District- Patna. 13. ... The Chief Executive Officer Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board, 2nd Floor, Haj Bhawan, Harding Road, Ali Imam Path, Police Station- Sachivalya, District- Patna. 14. ... The Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board Through its Chief Executive Office, 2nd Floor, Haj Bhawan, Harding Road, Ali#HL_END....
COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.) ... After expiry of the tenure of the existing office bearers on 15.05.2021, he as the Secretary, took steps for conducting General Body meeting for electing the Managing Committee for these three Jamaths, but on the instruction of the Waqf Board Chairman and the Superintendent of the Sivagangai Zone Waaf ... 9.Ali Masthan, who is the appellant in W.A(MD)No.3274 of 2025, contended that this Court, in his earlier Writ Petiti....
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also relied on the following judgments: i) Rajasthan Wakf Board Vs. Devki Nandan Pathak & others,2017 AIR (SC) 2155 ii) Rashid Wali Beg Vs. ... To support his contentions, the learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the judgments in : i) Rajasthan Wakf Board Vs. Devki Nandan Pathak & others,2017 AIR (SC) 2155 ii) Rashid Wali Beg Vs. ... for the relief of declaration and permanent injunction as against the Wakf #HL_....
19. The learned Senior Counsel for the appellant placed a reliance on Sayyed Ali v. A.P. Wakf Board, Hyderabad, [(1998) 2 SCC 642]. The Apex Court held as follows: 18. In view of the oral and documentary evidence on record produced, the plaintiff failed to prove title in the plaint schedule property. The own admissions of P.W.1 itself are not supporting the case of the plaintiff. The material on record clearly goes to show that the predecessors-in-title of the defendants are enjoying the plaint schedule properties since 1949 to the knowledge of the plaintiff, one and all. 2....
Abbas Ali Vs. Wakf Board), and the relevant portion of the same reads as follows: Learned counsel for the review petitioners also relied on a decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court reported in AIR 1979 AP 116 (Mohd. That a kazi performs duties of a religious nature is also mentioned in the Statement of Objects and Reasons of Kazis Act, 1880 (Act XII of 1880), which reads as follows:-
3. The case of the petitioner is that one Mr. Syed Ali has filed a case in W.E.A.No.17/87 against this petitioner before the first respondent Wakf Board alleging that the petitioner/applicant for removal of him from the Mutawalliship. Later, on 06.09.1990, Mr. Syed Ali was died, therefore, the application filed by him in W.E.A.No.17/87 became in fructuous. The said Mr. Syed Ali happened to be the President of Muslim Podhu Nala Sangam and he also instigated the Sangam Secretary one Mr. Mohammed Hussain to file W.E.A.No.1/90 against this petitioner for removal.
He placed reliance on the Judgment of the Supreme Curt reported in Sayyed Ali and others v. A.P. Wakf Board, Hyderabad and others (AIR 1998 SUPREME COURT 972) and Allauddin Charities and Zakath Wakf v. Hameed Ali and others (2002 (1) ALD 67 (DB)). He also contends that the plea of res judicata has no application to this case.
In the said case his Lordship of this Court was seized with the question whether the order passed under the U.P. Muslim Wafks Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was revisable under Section 76 of the Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order is not revisable as it is not a final award. In support he has placed reliance upon a decision of this Court in Naqshe Ali v. U.P. Sunni Central Wakf Board, 1970 ALJ 815. The Court held that the power of revision under Section 76 of the Act cannot be exercised by the High Court till an award has come ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
