Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Initial Warrant Issuance: Warrants (bailable or non-bailable) are issued when an accused fails to appear after summons or when there is evidence of deliberate avoidance of court proceedings. For example, NBWs are issued when accused do not appear despite bailable warrants or summons (e.g., sources ["Arige Venkataramaiah VS State of Telangana - Telangana"], ["R.Kanmani vs The Inspector of Police - Madras"], ["R.Kanmani vs The Inspector of Police - Madras"]).
Recalling Warrants Under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C.: An accused can apply for the recall of a warrant by filing an application under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C. before the court. The court must consider relevant factors such as the gravity of the offense, the accused’s role, and whether the accused is a habitual offender or has roots in society (sources ["Saran Gopal Krishnan VS Narcotics Control Bureau, Kolkata - Calcutta"], ["Arige Venkataramaiah VS State of Telangana - Telangana"], ["R.Kanmani vs The Inspector of Police - Madras"]).
Court’s Discretion and Considerations: Courts are expected to evaluate whether the warrant was issued appropriately, especially in cases of non-appearance or evasion. The courts have discretion to recall warrants if circumstances justify, such as the accused engaging a counsel, showing willingness to cooperate, or if the warrant was issued improperly (sources ["Arige Venkataramaiah VS State of Telangana - Telangana"], ["R.Kanmani vs The Inspector of Police - Madras"], ["Rahul. R, S/o Radhakrishnan Nair VS State Of Kerala - Kerala"]).
Procedural Steps for Recall:
If satisfied, the court may recall the warrant and modify or quash the proceedings related to it (sources ["Saran Gopal Krishnan VS Narcotics Control Bureau, Kolkata - Calcutta"], ["Arige Venkataramaiah VS State of Telangana - Telangana"], ["R.Kanmani vs The Inspector of Police - Madras"]).
Special Circumstances:
The process to recall a warrant involves an application by the accused or their counsel under Section 70(2) Cr.P.C., which the court reviews based on specific criteria such as the nature of the offense, the accused’s conduct, and procedural correctness. Courts have the authority to recall warrants if justified, especially in cases of procedural irregularities or if the accused demonstrates willingness to cooperate. Proper evaluation ensures that warrants are not misused and that the rights of the accused are protected during judicial proceedings.
References:- ["Saran Gopal Krishnan VS Narcotics Control Bureau, Kolkata - Calcutta"]- ["Arige Venkataramaiah VS State of Telangana - Telangana"]- ["R.Kanmani vs The Inspector of Police - Madras"]- ["R.Kanmani vs The Inspector of Police - Madras"]- ["Rahul. R, S/o Radhakrishnan Nair VS State Of Kerala - Kerala"]- ["RAHUL.R vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"]
Facing an arrest warrant can be a stressful situation, but Indian law provides mechanisms for the accused to seek its recall or cancellation. If you're wondering about the procedures to recall the warrant issued against the accused, this guide breaks it down based on established legal principles under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). We'll cover the steps, court considerations, and real-world examples to help you navigate this process effectively.
Important Disclaimer: This article provides general information based on legal precedents and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific case.
Arrest warrants—bailable (BW) or non-bailable (NBW)—are issued when an accused fails to appear in court, summons are not served, or there's a risk of absconding. However, the issuing court retains the power to recall or cancel them under Section 70(2) CrPC if proper grounds are shown. State Through Central Bureau Of Investigation VS Dawood Ibrahim Kaskar - 1997 4 Supreme 490
The core principle is that the court which issued the warrant has exclusive jurisdiction to cancel it. V. S. Kuttan Pillai VS Ramakrishnan - 1979 0 Supreme(SC) 401 This ensures procedural fairness and prevents forum shopping.
The process involves filing an application before the issuing court for cancellation. The court must issue a reasoned order, considering factors like offence gravity, accused's role, absconding risk, and warrant issuance grounds. This order is final but revisable. Bhakta Ramegowda VS State of Karnataka - 1997 3 Supreme 108Narendra Kumar Jain and Another VS Intelligence Officer, NCB, Chennai and Another - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 1084
Here's a clear roadmap typically followed:
Approach the Issuing Court: The accused or authorized representative must file the application personally or through counsel before the same court. V. S. Kuttan Pillai VS Ramakrishnan - 1979 0 Supreme(SC) 401
File the Application Promptly: Submit a detailed petition with reasons, such as no prior notice, health issues, or willingness to cooperate. Include undertakings to appear on fixed dates. The court must decide without undue delay with a reasoned order. Bhakta Ramegowda VS State of Karnataka - 1997 3 Supreme 108
Court's Evaluation: Judges apply judicial discretion, avoiding mechanical decisions. Factors include:
Accused's conduct, health, and cooperation potential. Govt. of A. P. VS Anne Venkatesware - 1977 0 Supreme(SC) 100
Order and Finality: If granted, the warrant is canceled; if refused, it's final but challengeable via revision under CrPC Sections 397/401. Bhakta Ramegowda VS State of Karnataka - 1997 3 Supreme 108
Post-Recall Compliance: Appear as directed to avoid re-issuance.
Note: Applications must be before execution; post-arrest, seek bail instead.
Courts emphasize judicious discretion over rote refusal or grant. Sunil Tyagi VS Govt of NCT of Delhi - 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 831 For instance, mere suspicion isn't enough; concrete grounds are required. V. S. Kuttan Pillai VS Ramakrishnan - 1979 0 Supreme(SC) 401
In summons cases like Section 138 NI Act, presence isn't mandatory for filing recall applications under Section 70(2) CrPC. A magistrate erred by rejecting one solely due to absence. Haridas Salian, S/o. Janardhan Salian VS Rama R. Shetty Proprietor of Shri. Hanuman Enterprises - 2018 Supreme(Kar) 484
Legal precedents illustrate application:
Bail Condition Compliance: In a UAPA case, non-compliance led to remand, but the High Court set aside the dismissal upon surety readiness, directing release. Shahul Hammed @ Shahul Hammed Khan @ Anwar @ Annu VS Union of India rep. by The Deputy Superintendent of Police Chennai - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 1363
Family Exemption and COVID: Petitioners with COVID symptoms got NBW recalled on condition of appearance and filing recall petition. Kuppannan VS Inspector of Police, Salem - 2022 Supreme(Mad) 8
Unexecuted Warrants: Courts quash NBWs if not justified, urging alternatives first to protect liberty. Ajeet Kumar VS State of U. P. - 2024 Supreme(All) 1919
Summons Case Recall: NBW recalled without accused presence in NI Act case. Haridas Salian, S/o. Janardhan Salian VS Rama R. Shetty Proprietor of Shri. Hanuman Enterprises - 2018 Supreme(Kar) 484
Procedural Errors: BW quashed for lacking jurisdiction post-cognizance. Sanjay Mishra, S/o Late B K Mishra VS State of Chhattisgarh - 2023 Supreme(Chh) 214
These show courts favor recall with safeguards like bonds or sureties.
Courts must follow natural justice, issuing reasoned orders. Bhakta Ramegowda VS State of Karnataka - 1997 3 Supreme 108
| Factor | Importance ||--------|------------|| Issuing Court Jurisdiction | Exclusive power to recall. V. S. Kuttan Pillai VS Ramakrishnan - 1979 0 Supreme(SC) 401 || Judicial Discretion | Balance offence gravity vs. liberty. Narendra Kumar Jain and Another VS Intelligence Officer, NCB, Chennai and Another - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 1084 || Application Mode | Personal/representative, prompt. Bhakta Ramegowda VS State of Karnataka - 1997 3 Supreme 108 || Finality | Revisable order. Bhakta Ramegowda VS State of Karnataka - 1997 3 Supreme 108 || Alternatives | Exhaust summons/BW before NBW. Ajeet Kumar VS State of U. P. - 2024 Supreme(All) 1919 |
Recalling a warrant is feasible with proper procedure and merits. Stay proactive, comply with conditions, and seek expert help.
References:1. V. S. Kuttan Pillai VS Ramakrishnan - 1979 0 Supreme(SC) 401 - Recall procedure and issuing court approach.2. Bhakta Ramegowda VS State of Karnataka - 1997 3 Supreme 108 - Reasoned orders and revision.3. Narendra Kumar Jain and Another VS Intelligence Officer, NCB, Chennai and Another - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 1084 - Factors for consideration.4. Sunil Tyagi VS Govt of NCT of Delhi - 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 831 - Judicial discretion guidelines.5. Other cases: Shahul Hammed @ Shahul Hammed Khan @ Anwar @ Annu VS Union of India rep. by The Deputy Superintendent of Police Chennai - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 1363, Haridas Salian, S/o. Janardhan Salian VS Rama R. Shetty Proprietor of Shri. Hanuman Enterprises - 2018 Supreme(Kar) 484, Ajeet Kumar VS State of U. P. - 2024 Supreme(All) 1919, Sanjay Mishra, S/o Late B K Mishra VS State of Chhattisgarh - 2023 Supreme(Chh) 214, Kuppannan VS Inspector of Police, Salem - 2022 Supreme(Mad) 8.
This guide draws from verified legal documents for accuracy. For personalized advice, contact a criminal lawyer today.
#WarrantRecall, #ArrestWarrant, #CriminalLawIndia
Trial in respect of the other accused persons has commenced. 21. A Warrant of arrest issued by the Court is a process to secure the presence of the Accused in Court. ... If the Court has issued a Warrant of arrest and if the Accused approaches the Court for recalling the said warrant under Section 70(2) of Cr.P.C. the consideration would be totally dif....
No. 4637 of 2022, the petitioner/accused had engaged a counsel and when the matter came up for hearing on 06.09.2023, the trial Court has observed that the accused was called absent and there was no representation on behalf of the accused and therefore, the Court had issued an NBW (Non-Bailable Warrant ... It is stated that again on 05.10.2023, the accused was called absent and that no r....
On 08.03.2022, neither the appellant nor his counsel appeared before the Trial Court and hence Bailable Warrant was issued against the appellant. ... Hence Non- Bailable Warrant [hereinafter ''NBW'' for the sake of convenience and brevity] was issued considering that as early as on 08.03.2022 when Bailable Warrant was recalled with a condition to execute a bond and furnish sureties as per Section 88 Cr.P.....
The learned trial Judge shall permit the petitioner to participate in the trial proceedings without insisting recall of Non Bailable Warrant issued on 21.12.2022. ... Thereafter, the trial Court has issued a non-bailable warrant on 21.12.2022. Even after that, the respondent police have not taken action to secure the accused. ... On that day, this Court passed the following order: “The p....
issued against the accused. ... warrant issued against her. ... The learned trial Judge shall permit the petitioner to participate in the trial proceedings without insisting recall of Non Bailable Warrant issued on 21.12.2022. ... She did not appear and hence non-bailable warrant was issued on 21.12.2022 and to r....
ii) On 03/11/2022, service report was received and since summons were issued to Accused No. 1 and 2 and both of them failed to appear, bailable warrant was issued to them for their appearance on 14/11/2022, however, summon issued to Accused No. 3 came back unserved stating that ... The question for consideration would be whether learned Judicial Magistrate was empowered to review or #HL....
If the accused seem to be avoiding the summons, the court, in the second instance should issue bailable warrant. ... Non-bailable warrant should be issued to bring a person to court when summons or bailable warrants would be unlikely to have the desired result. ... In the third instance, when the court is fully satisfied that the accused is avoiding the court's proceeding intentionally, the process of iss....
has to be issued initially and if even after the bailable warrant, there is failure to appear, only then should a non-bailable warrant be issued. ... b) If such an accused does not appear despite service of summons, then Bailable Warrant for Physical appearance may be issued. ... All these procedures are intended to ascertain whether the acc....
be issued initially and if even after the bailable warrant, there is failure to appear, only then should a non-bailable warrant be issued. ... b) If such an accused does not appear despite service of summons, then Bailable Warrant for Physical appearance may be issued. c) NBW on failure to appear despite issuance of Bailable Warrant. ... All these #HL....
He further submitted that on 19.07.2018, Non Bailabale Warrant was issued against the petitioner. ... As per the prosecution case, all the accused conspired together,issued pamphlets and collected huge sum from 16 depositors and cheated them. Hence, a complaint. 4. ... After two years, following the procedures, on 06.03.2020, the case was split up as against the petitioner and numbered as C.C.No.3 of 2021....
7. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsels and also taking note of the dates and events, this Court of the opinion that the order dated 10.12.2021 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate IV, Salem in Crl.M.P.No.4717 of 2021 in C.C.No.119 of 2016 can be set aside on condition the petitioners shall appear before the Trial Court on 15.02.2022 without fail and file petition for recalling the warrant. On such appearance and filing petition for recalling wa....
As such learned Magistrate by order dated 07.12.2017 has issued non-bailable warrant to the accused. However, learned Magistrate on the premise that accused is not present when the application is taken-up for consideration, has rejected the said application. Thereafter, on 23.02.2018 accused having come to know about warrant having been issued against him, filed an application under Section 70(2) of Cr.P.C. for recall of the warrant.
He is directed to surrender before the court below within 30 days from the date of this order and serve out his sentence as modified by this Court. In case, the appellant does not surrender within the stipulated time, the court below shall pass appropriate order for procuring the attendance of the appellant and shall send him to jail. Though non-bailable warrant has been issued against him and his application for recall of warrant is pending.
At this stage, the Bench hearing the revision observing that the complainant-in-person is continuously interrupting the proceedings and smooth functioning of the Court, directed to post it before any other Court. Aggrieved of the same, seeking to recall the warrant issued against the accused and to suspend the order of this Court dated 02-04-2012 passed in Criminal R.C.M.P. On 02-04-2012, as there was no representation and also for previous three occasions by then on behalf o....
So registry is directed to recall the bailable warrant issued against the accused. Only if the accused fails to pay the amount passed under this Judgment, on petition, warrant to compel his attendance is to be issued and not before that.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
