Missing Injunction Prayer in Application: Can You Still Argue for It?

2023 Supreme(US)(ca10) 2

Plaintiffs do not argue that the first exception applies, thus this Court will not address it.” Id., Vol. 5 at 1090 (citation omitted). ... Colorado Plaintiffs do not argue the district court improperly applied the “contrary to law” standard in deciding legal issues. ... Colorado Plaintiffs nonetheless argue the Anti-Injunction Act does not#HL_....

Court of Appeal Putrajaya

[9] The matter did not end there. The Plaintiff then applied under encl 210 to the High Court for a new date to be fixed for the Defendants to comply with the Injunction Order ("Application'). ... [37] For those reasons, this Court does not agree with the Defendants that the Injunction Order in this Application is a one-off Order that expires with the lapse of time and payment of a....

2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 781

If the prima facie case is established the Court dealing with such application considers the other two factors namely whether the balance of convenience and in convenience is in favour of granting the injunction and the question of irreparable injury of the applicant if the prayer is not allowed However ... case of the plaintiff the balance of convenience and inconvenience and that the plaintiff will suff....

2024 Supreme(US)(ca7) 22

Yet, despite the procedural confusion, the merits issues were not going away. The case would be continuing whether the district court had issued a preliminary injunction, a permanent injunction, or no injunction. ... And under § 3626(a)(2), one is limited to 90 days at a time and the other is not. A district court issuing an injunction must be unmistakably clear abo....

2023 0 Supreme(Kar) 1127

While considering whether an application for amendment should or should not be allowed, the Court should not go into the correctness or falsity of the case in the amendment. ... The contention of the petitioners/defendants that the amendment would change the nature of suit and cause of action and the prayer for mandatory injunction itself is not maintainable would #HL_S....

Injunction-Prayer in plaint-Affidavit-Civil Procedure Code s. 662. Where the plaint in an action includes a prayer for an interim injunction, the application for the injunction must be supported by an affidavit. ... An interim injunction may be applied for in the plaint, or it may be made in the course of the action though not....

2023 Supreme(US)(ca11) 240

Nor does she have any reason to show or argue that she did not aid or abet that person or entity that is allegedly in privity with the enjoined party. ... The record here does not clear these hurdles. The district court did not make factual findings about whether Robinson was a key employee. ... So besides those categories Rule 65(d) identifies, we have read the rule ....

It would not be just to confine the plaintiff to his remedy in damages. An interim injunction must be granted to stop the wrongdoer from obtaining the benefits arising from his own wrongful conduct. The application to dissolve the injunction therefore could not succeed". ... State Film Corporation(4) wherein the following principle of law was enunciated with regard to the sequential tests that should....

2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 243

Though normally amendments are allowed in the pleadings to avoid multiplicity of litigation, the Court needs to take into consideration whether the application for amendment is bona fide or mala fide and whether the amendment causes such prejudice to the other side which cannot be compensated adequately ... The respondent nos. 1 to 3 did not file reply to the application for amendment to....

2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 293

While considering whether an application for amendment should or should not be allowed, the court should not go into the correctness or falsity of the case in the amendment. ... (b) The prayer for inserting Mandatory Injunction and recovery of possession in the prayer portion of the plaint by the plaintiff in filing the amendment application is hereby....

2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 2216

11. The plaintiff entered the witness box as P.W.1 and the subjected himself to cross examination. On the side of plaintiff, Exs.A1 to A6 were marked. On the side of the defendants, 1st defendant-Vimala was examined as D.W.1 and Exs.B1 to B9 were marked. (4) Whether the suit is bad for without seeking declaration prayer, the mandatory injunction prayer is unsustainable as stated by the defendants?” “(1) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the relief of mandatory injunction as prayed for?(2) W....

2021 0 Supreme(All) 531

“In the above mentioned circumstances and in the interest of justice this Hon'ble Court may be pleased grant ad-interim ex-parte injunction in favour of the applicant/plaintiff and against the defendants, his associates, musclemen, agent, legal heirs, representatives etc, till the pendency of the suit.” 8. Alongside the suit, an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC was also made with a rather curiously worded prayer. The prayer ....

2015 0 Supreme(MP) 718

Even if, the relief of injunction is confined against respondent No.5, fact remains that even this right is arising out of alleged agreement to sell. Thus, it is required to be seen whether on the basis of an unstamped agreement, a prayer for injunction can be considered. Putting it differently whether the petitioner can rely on an unstamped document even for the purpose of seeking injunction. Since, this question goes to the root of the matter, I deem it proper to deal with ....

2011 0 Supreme(Mad) 3169

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to get injunction prayer? iv. To what other relief the plaintiff is entitled to?

2009 0 Supreme(Del) 1165

In the aforesaid case, the question had arisen as to whether the respondent No.1 had violated the conditions stipulated in the agreement between the parties by changing the structure of the firm without taking prior permission from the appellant and whether in such circumstances still the latter was bound to give to the former an opportunity for rectifying the defect; and whether passing the order revoking the agreement without affording such opportunity would render the revocation order inval....