Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Section 80 of CPC - Purpose and Object Section 80 mandates prior notice of two months to be served on the government or public officers before filing a suit concerning acts done in official capacity. The primary object is to give the government an opportunity to reconsider, settle, or amend claims without litigation, ensuring administrative convenience and justice. The notice aims to prevent unnecessary litigation and facilitate settlement (Sources: Government College, Chavara Represented by its Principal vs E. Ambikadevi Amma W/o Raja Bhooshan Nair - Kerala, Utkal University VS Md. Wazid Hussain - Orissa, Arti Gupta, wife of Late S.K. Gupta vs Civil Surgeon, Sadar Hospital, Hazaribag, P.O. & P.S.- Hazaribag, District-Hazaribag - Jharkhand, Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar vs Sandip Madhav Khase - Bombay).
Waiver of Notice under Section 80(2) CPC Section 80(2) allows courts to grant leave for waiving the notice period, especially in cases of urgency or emergent circumstances. If such leave is granted, the suit can proceed without prior notice, and the objection to non-issuance of notice is waived. This waiver is subject to the court’s discretion and procedural compliance, including filing proper applications and obtaining leave (Sources: State of Meghalaya VS Albert Steven Diengdoh - Meghalaya, Khodaji Govaji Rajput VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat, St. Pius X Church, Represented By The Pastor Of The Parish, Rev. Fr. Jose Franklin B. , S/o. Bercumance VS State Of Kerala, Represented By Chief Engineer, PWD (Buildings Division) - Kerala, Raghav Chadha VS Rajya Sabha Secretariat - Delhi, Salem Advocate Bar Association, T. N. VS Union Of India - Supreme Court, A. R. Antulay VS R. S. Nayak - Supreme Court).
Procedure for Applying for Waiver An application under Section 80(2) CPC must be filed and granted by the court before the suit is instituted without notice. The court assesses urgency and the merits of such waiver, and failure to seek or obtain leave can render the suit invalid or defective. The courts have emphasized that proper procedural steps, including filing applications and obtaining leave, are essential for validity (Sources: State of Meghalaya VS Albert Steven Diengdoh - Meghalaya, Khodaji Govaji Rajput VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat, Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar vs Sandip Madhav Khase - Bombay, Raghav Chadha VS Rajya Sabha Secretariat - Delhi).
Legal Consequences of Non-Compliance If notice is not issued and no leave under Section 80(2) is obtained, the defendant can raise the objection that the suit is not maintainable. Courts have held that non-compliance with the notice requirement, unless waived, can be fatal to the suit. However, if waiver is granted, objections based on lack of notice are waived, and the suit proceeds on merits (Sources: Arti Gupta, wife of Late S.K. Gupta vs Civil Surgeon, Sadar Hospital, Hazaribag, P.O. & P.S.- Hazaribag, District-Hazaribag - Jharkhand, Utkal University VS Md. Wazid Hussain - Orissa, Salem Advocate Bar Association, T. N. VS Union Of India - Supreme Court).
Waiver as a Deemed or Express Act Courts have recognized that waiver can be expressed (through application and court order) or deemed (by conduct or failure to object during trial). Once waiver is established, the defendant cannot challenge the suit on the ground of non-issuance of notice (Sources: Utkal University VS Md. Wazid Hussain - Orissa, A. R. Antulay VS R. S. Nayak - Supreme Court).
Judicial Discretion and Exceptions The courts exercise discretion in granting waiver, especially in cases of urgency, public interest, or where strict adherence to procedural requirements would cause injustice. The object of Section 80 is to balance procedural safeguards with equitable considerations (Sources: St. Pius X Church, Represented By The Pastor Of The Parish, Rev. Fr. Jose Franklin B. , S/o. Bercumance VS State Of Kerala, Represented By Chief Engineer, PWD (Buildings Division) - Kerala, Bandhua Mukti Morcha VS Union Of India - Supreme Court).
The waiver of notice under Section 80 CPC is permissible through a court order under Section 80(2), primarily to address urgent or emergent cases where prior notice may be impractical. The procedure involves filing a proper application and obtaining leave before filing the suit without notice. Once waived, the objection to non-issuance of notice is effectively waived, allowing the suit to proceed. Courts emphasize procedural compliance but also recognize exceptions where public interest or urgency justifies waiver, reflecting the provision’s flexible and equitable intent.
References:- Government College, Chavara Represented by its Principal vs E. Ambikadevi Amma W/o Raja Bhooshan Nair - Kerala, State of Meghalaya VS Albert Steven Diengdoh - Meghalaya, Khodaji Govaji Rajput VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat, Arti Gupta, wife of Late S.K. Gupta vs Civil Surgeon, Sadar Hospital, Hazaribag, P.O. & P.S.- Hazaribag, District-Hazaribag - Jharkhand, Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar vs Sandip Madhav Khase - Bombay, Raghav Chadha VS Rajya Sabha Secretariat - Delhi, A. R. Antulay VS R. S. Nayak - Supreme Court, Salem Advocate Bar Association, T. N. VS Union Of India - Supreme Court, Kartar Singh: Kripa Shankar Rai VS State Of Punjab - Supreme Court, St. Pius X Church, Represented By The Pastor Of The Parish, Rev. Fr. Jose Franklin B. , S/o. Bercumance VS State Of Kerala, Represented By Chief Engineer, PWD (Buildings Division) - Kerala, Bandhua Mukti Morcha VS Union Of India - Supreme Court
In civil litigation involving the government or public officers, procedural hurdles can significantly impact a suit's maintainability. One such critical requirement is the mandatory notice under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC). But what happens if the plaintiff skips this notice? Can a defendant object that the plaintiff has not given notice under Section 80 CPC to the State Government in a suit?
This question arises frequently in suits against government entities, where plaintiffs must serve a two-month notice before filing to allow time for settlement or reconsideration. While non-compliance can initially seem fatal, courts have carved out exceptions through waiver—either express, implied by conduct, or via court permission. This post delves into the nuances, drawing from established judicial precedents, to help you understand when objections hold and when they may be deemed waived.
Note: This is general information based on legal precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Section 80 CPC requires plaintiffs to deliver a notice in writing to the Secretary to the Government or the Collector of the district at least two months before instituting a suit against the Government or a public officer acting in their official capacity. The primary object is to give the government an opportunity to reconsider, settle, or amend claims without litigation, ensuring administrative convenience and justiceGovernment College, Chavara Represented by its Principal vs E. Ambikadevi Amma W/o Raja Bhooshan Nair - KeralaUtkal University VS Md. Wazid Hussain - OrissaArti Gupta, wife of Late S.K. Gupta vs Civil Surgeon, Sadar Hospital, Hazaribag, P.O. & P.S.- Hazaribag, District-Hazaribag - JharkhandZilla Parishad, Ahmednagar vs Sandip Madhav Khase - Bombay.
Compliance is generally mandatory and a condition precedent to the suit's maintainability Bajaj Hindustan Sugar & Industries Limited VS Balrampur Chini Mills LTD. - 2007 0 Supreme(SC) 366Paleti Sivaramakrishnayya VS Executive Engineer, N. C. Canals Sathenapalli - 1978 0 Supreme(AP) 81. Without it, defendants—especially government parties—can challenge the suit's validity. However, this rigidity is tempered by provisions for waiver.
Yes, a defendant can object to the absence of notice under Section 80 CPC, typically arguing the suit is not maintainable. Courts have held that non-compliance, unless waived, can be fatal to the suitArti Gupta, wife of Late S.K. Gupta vs Civil Surgeon, Sadar Hospital, Hazaribag, P.O. & P.S.- Hazaribag, District-Hazaribag - JharkhandUtkal University VS Md. Wazid Hussain - OrissaSalem Advocate Bar Association, T. N. VS Union Of India - Supreme Court. For instance, if no notice is served and no exemption is sought, the objection should be raised at the earliest stage, such as in the written statement S. A. Ramachandran VS S. Neelavathy - 1997 1 Supreme 347Nagar Kshetra Samiti Thru Office Incharge/Chairman VS Kanchan Singh - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 666P. B. SHAH AND CO. VS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - 1961 0 Supreme(Cal) 132.
However, the right to object is not absolute. Waiver of the notice under Section 80 CPC is recognized as possible and can be inferred from conduct or inaction of the party for whose benefit the notice is intendedBajaj Hindustan Sugar & Industries Limited VS Balrampur Chini Mills LTD. - 2007 0 Supreme(SC) 366Paleti Sivaramakrishnayya VS Executive Engineer, N. C. Canals Sathenapalli - 1978 0 Supreme(AP) 81. If the defendant participates in proceedings without promptly raising the issue, courts may deem the objection waived.
Waiver is a question of law, inferred from facts and conduct, and not merely a procedural lapse. Key indicators include:
In AIR 1969 SC 674, the Court emphasized that failure to raise the objection in the written statement or during trial amounts to waiverP. B. SHAH AND CO. VS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - 1961 0 Supreme(Cal) 132. Courts infer waiver from conduct, even without express words Paleti Sivaramakrishnayya VS Executive Engineer, N. C. Canals Sathenapalli - 1978 0 Supreme(AP) 81.
Section 80(2) provides a statutory mechanism for waiver in urgent cases. Sub-sec.(2) of Sec.80 CPC deals with waiver of notice. Plaintiffs can apply for court leave to institute the suit without serving the notice as required by Section 80(1), particularly in emergent circumstancesJhanak Singh vs Shri Sandeep Singh - 2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9298 - 2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9298Premalata Samal @ Mahapatra VS State of Odisha - Current Civil CasesPremalata Samal @ Mahapatra VS State of Odisha - 2019 Supreme(Ori) 2 - 2019 0 Supreme(Ori) 2.
Once granted, the objection to non-issuance of notice is waived, and the suit proceeds State of Meghalaya VS Albert Steven Diengdoh - MeghalayaKhodaji Govaji Rajput VS State of Gujarat - GujaratSt. Pius X Church, Represented By The Pastor Of The Parish, Rev. Fr. Jose Franklin B. , S/o. Bercumance VS State Of Kerala, Represented By Chief Engineer, PWD (Buildings Division) - KeralaRaghav Chadha VS Rajya Sabha Secretariat - DelhiSalem Advocate Bar Association, T. N. VS Union Of India - Supreme CourtA. R. Antulay VS R. S. Nayak - Supreme Court. For example, it is not in dispute that the plaintiff had moved an application under Section 80(2) CPC seeking exemption from notice and... once permission has been granted by the courtJhanak Singh vs Shri Sandeep Singh - 2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9298 - 2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9298. Failure to obtain this leave beforehand can still invite objections, but courts assess urgency and merits Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar vs Sandip Madhav Khase - Bombay.
This was a case where this Court was considering whether a notice under section 80 of the CPC is capable of being ‘waived’ or contemplates even a ‘deemed waiver’. Answering affirmatively Ganga Taro Vazirani VS Deepak Raheja - 2021 Supreme(Bom) 191 - 2021 0 Supreme(Bom) 191.
Objections must be timely—preferably before or during trial. Late pleas, after merit-based participation, are typically rejected unless exceptional circumstances exist, like lack of knowledge Bishandayal And Sons VS State Of Orissa - 2000 8 Supreme 375Nagar Kshetra Samiti Thru Office Incharge/Chairman VS Kanchan Singh - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 666Bajaj Hindustan Sugar & Industries Limited VS Balrampur Chini Mills LTD. - 2007 0 Supreme(SC) 366.
Courts exercise discretion in granting waiver under Section 80(2), especially in cases of urgency, public interest, or where strict adherence would cause injusticeSt. Pius X Church, Represented By The Pastor Of The Parish, Rev. Fr. Jose Franklin B. , S/o. Bercumance VS State Of Kerala, Represented By Chief Engineer, PWD (Buildings Division) - KeralaBandhua Mukti Morcha VS Union Of India - Supreme Court. Waiver can be expressed (through application and court order) or deemed (by conduct or failure to object during trial)Utkal University VS Md. Wazid Hussain - OrissaA. R. Antulay VS R. S. Nayak - Supreme Court.
Note limitations: A notice must still comply with Section 80(3)(b) requirements, like disclosing the cause of action. Clearly the notice under Section 80 CPC was not a valid notice as required... since the notice did not disclose the lease deed upon which the suit was basedBANSH GOPAL KAPOOR VS REGIONAL FOOD CONTROLLER - 2013 Supreme(All) 1840 - 2013 0 Supreme(All) 1840.
While defendants can object to non-compliance with Section 80 CPC notice in suits against the State Government, success hinges on timeliness and avoiding waiver. The legal consensus is that waiver... is primarily inferred from conduct or inaction, rendering late objections ineffective Bajaj Hindustan Sugar & Industries Limited VS Balrampur Chini Mills LTD. - 2007 0 Supreme(SC) 366Paleti Sivaramakrishnayya VS Executive Engineer, N. C. Canals Sathenapalli - 1978 0 Supreme(AP) 81. Section 80(2) offers a procedural escape for urgent matters, balancing protection with flexibility.
Ultimately, the object of Section 80 is to prevent unnecessary litigation and promote settlement, but procedural compliance can be waived if the party's conduct indicates acceptancePatil Automation Private Limited VS Rakheja Engineers Private Limited - 2022 7 Supreme 607Nagar Kshetra Samiti Thru Office Incharge/Chairman VS Kanchan Singh - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 666. Understanding these dynamics can prevent procedural dismissals or unintended waivers.
For tailored guidance, consult a legal expert. Stay informed on CPC updates to navigate government litigation effectively.
Section 80 of the CPC was specifically raised. ... Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 reads as under: “80. Notice. ... The prayer in the interlocutory application is to dispense with the notice under Section 80 of the CPC.
80(2); failure to establish this may invalidate the suit. ... 80(1) if urgency is demonstrated, but must assess urgency based on the plaint; failure to do so renders the suit barred by law - ... and 80(2) - Application for leave to file suit against Government without notice - The court can allow a waiver of notice under Section ... /leave under section 80(2) CPC. ... Thereafter, the imp....
of Notice under Section 80 of CPC by the State Government. 3. ... AUCTION - SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION - NOTICE UNDER SECTION 80 OF CPC - WAIVER - REVISION POWER UNDER SECTION 211 OF BOMBAY ... There is no iota of evidence as to issuance of Notice under Section 80 of CPC by the plaintiff to the government. 4. ... He has submitted that in absence of Notice under #HL_S....
80 of C.P.C. ... of due diligence and belatedness - It was ruled that an amendment pertaining to a new cause of action requires compliance with Section ... In the original plaint it is stated that prior notice under Section 80 of C.P.C. to the State had been given for the relief sought. ... State of Orissa and Others AIR 2001 Supreme Court 544 that notice under #HL_S....
CIVIL LIABILITY - DAMAGES AND COMPENSATION - C.P.C. 80 - The court discussed Section 80 of the C.P.C., which ... 80 of the C.P.C. since they did not raise this issue during the trial. ... including Utkal University, waived their right to challenge the maintainability of the suit due to non-service of notice under Section ... Padmanav Choudhury and others-C.P.C., 1908-Section 80....
(Paras 9-12) ... ... (B) Waiver of Notice Period - Section 80 of CPC allows for waiver but under ... Section 80 of CPC contemplates notice period of two months and sub-section (2) pertains to leave of the Court for waiver of the notice period. It is mandatory to issue such notice. ... In that case application under....
It is not in dispute that the plaintiff had moved an application under Section 80(2) CPC seeking exemption from notice and as per Section 80(2) CPC, suit can be instituted with leave of the court without serving the notice as required by Section 80(1) and once permission has been granted by the court ... Therefore, i....
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 80, (1), (2) - Rejection of leave - Interim injunction - Pertaining ... to rejection of leave under Section 80(2) C.P.C. by trial court finding that there is no necessity for any urgent relief in suit ... 80 C.P.C. ... There is failure on the part of the trial court to understand the real spirit under Section 80 C.P.C#HL....
2(17) CPC for purposes of section 80 CPC. ... The letter dated 14.03.2023 cannot be treated as a notice under Section 80 of CPC. ... section 80 CPC is applicable. ... An analysis of the provision shows that section 80 CPC is in two parts : #HL_ST....
The Court held that the plaintiff's compliance with Section 80 of CPC was sufficient and that the first appellate Court's decision ... Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of Section 80 of CPC, which requires ... 80 of CPC. ... of Section 80 of CPC is erroneous. ... In most of the cases, notice g....
While referring to the plaint as well as the observation of the first Appellate Court, Mr. Jadeja, learned AGP has submitted that there is no iota of evidence as to issuance of Notice under Section 80 of CPC by the plaintiff to the government. As observed by the first Appellate Court, Mr. Jadeja has also submitted that at the time of issuance of so called sale certificate in favour of the plaintiff, the original private defendant was in possession of the land in question and even after issuanc....
This was a case where this Court was considering whether a notice under section 80 of the CPC is capable of being ‘waived’ or contemplates even a ‘deemed waiver’. Answering this question in the affirmative, this Court held as under:- “15. In this regard, Mr. Andhyarujina relied upon a decision of this Court in the case of Chandrashekhar Purushottam Rathi v. State of Maharashtra [2002(2) Mh. L. J. 181] to contend that just as a notice under section 80 of the CPC is capable of ....
Sub-sec.(2) of Sec.80 CPC deals with waiver of notice. On a bare perusal of the aforesaid provision, it is crystal clear that save as otherwise provided in sub-sec. (2), no suit shall be instituted against the Government including the Government of the State of Jammu and Kashmir or against a public officer in respect of any act purporting to be done by such public officer in his official capacity, until the expiration of two months next after notice in writing has been delive....
On a bare perusal of the aforesaid provision, it is crystal clear that save as otherwise provided in sub.sec(2), no suit shall be instituted against the Government including the Government of the State of Jammu and Kashmir or against a public officer in respect of any act purporting to be done by such public officer in his official capacity, until the expiration of two months next after notice in writing has been delivered to the Secretary to the Government or the Collector of the district. #H....
Clearly the notice under Section 80 CPC was not a valid notice as required by the provisions of Section 80(3)(b) CPC. The fact that the lease deed was filed in the suit could not make the notice a valid notice since the notice did not disclose the lease deed upon which the suit was based for a cause of action. There was no mention of the lease deed although the tenancy was admittedly by virtue of a written lease deed entered into between the parties.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
