Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Case Reference and Date - The query pertains to the case identified as BA 45B 13 05 2025, which appears to be associated with legal proceedings and judgments dated around June 2025, as indicated by multiple references to orders and judgments passed in 2025 ["M/s. Annai Velankanni College vs Director General - Madras"] ["MANU VENUGOPAL vs KERALA STATE REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR - Kerala"].
Main Points and Insights:
Nature of Cases - The cases involve issues such as valuation of instruments, stamp duty, exemption eligibility under Rule 45B, and procedural disputes, with judgments in 2025 confirming or dismissing petitions, indicating the courts' finality in these matters ["MANU VENUGOPAL vs KERALA STATE REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR - Kerala"], ["LAILA BEEGAM A.R vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- Judgment Dated this the 20th day of June, 2025 ["MANU VENUGOPAL vs KERALA STATE REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR - Kerala"]- OP(C) No.1510 of 2016 and related orders in December 2025 ["MANU VENUGOPAL vs KERALA STATE REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR - Kerala"]- Orders and dismissals of petitions in 2025 regarding valuation and exemption issues ["LAILA BEEGAM A.R vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"], ["JEENA A.MATHEW Vs THE STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"]
Have you ever needed to locate a specific court case, only to hit a dead end? In the realm of Malaysian law, particularly at the Shah Alam High Court, case numbers like BA-45B-13-05/2025 often spark urgent inquiries from lawyers, parties involved, or researchers. This post dives deep into whether this exact case exists in available legal documents, why it might not appear, and what similar matters reveal about criminal proceedings in Malaysia. We'll also touch on broader legal contexts where 45B formats or sections appear globally.
If you're asking, Can you find the case of BA-45B-13-05/2025?, read on for a thorough breakdown based on reviewed records.
The Shah Alam High Court in Malaysia handles a range of criminal trials, bail applications (BA), appeals, and judicial reviews. Case numbers typically follow formats like BA-45B-XX-XX/XXXX, where:- BA stands for Bail Application or similar proceedings.- 45B refers to the court registry or division (common in Shah Alam matters).- XX-XX indicates serial numbers and months.- /XXXX denotes the year.
Examples abound in criminal contexts, such as joint murder charges under Section 302 of the Penal Code read with Section 34. However, a meticulous search across provided legal documents yields no exact match for BA-45B-13-05/2025PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. RAGUNATHAN SELVAMANI & LAIN-LAIN RAYUAN - 2025 MarsdenLR 2037.
After a comprehensive review, the specific case BA-45B-13-05/2025 is not referenced in any analyzed documents. This includes criminal trials, appeals, and related proceedings primarily from Shah Alam. No high-confidence matches exist, despite numerous similar formats PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. INTAN FARAH NUR AIN MUHAMAD & SATU LAGI; DAN SATU KES YANG LAIN - 2023 MarsdenLR 916PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. RAGUNATHAN SELVAMANI & LAIN-LAIN RAYUAN - 2025 MarsdenLR 2037.
This absence could stem from the case being too recent, not digitized, or outside the reviewed corpus. Analysis is limited to provided materials—no external searches were conducted.
While the queried case eludes records, patterns emerge:- Criminal Murder Trials: Multiple BA-45B cases involve Pendakwa Raya (Public Prosecutor) versus defendants in joint charges under s 302 KK r/t s 34 PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. RAGUNATHAN SELVAMANI & LAIN-LAIN RAYUAN - 2025 MarsdenLR 2037.- Bail and Appeals: Originating summons like BA-24NCC(SOA)-1-03/2025 differ in structure GLOBAL BUILT SDN BHD vs TEOH KHAI SIN & ANOTHER CASE - 2025 MarsdenLR 2844.
These suggest BA-45B cases often pertain to serious crimes, bail hearings, or remittals. If BA-45B-13-05/2025 follows suit, it may involve similar themes.
Interestingly, 45B recurs in international statutes, offering comparative insights—though unrelated to the Malaysian query:
These highlight how 45B denotes procedural timelines, exemptions, or recovery powers across jurisdictions, potentially aiding research on analogous Malaysian matters.
No indirect references, timelines, or cross-citations link to BA-45B-13-05/2025. For ongoing Shah Alam proceedings:1. Consult Court Registries: Directly approach Shah Alam High Court clerks for physical/digital records.2. Review Similar Documents: Study joint murder files like PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. RAGUNATHAN SELVAMANI & LAIN-LAIN RAYUAN - 2025 MarsdenLR 2037 for precedents.3. Legal Databases: Use official Malaysian portals (e.g., e-filing systems) beyond public docs.4. Professional Help: Engage counsel familiar with BA formats.
In summary, BA-45B-13-05/2025 does not appear in reviewed Shah Alam High Court documents, despite close numerical kin like BA-45B-11-05/2023. This underscores the challenges of case searches in non-digitized or recent matters. Globally, 45B evokes statutory safeguards, from labor compliance to educational exemptions.
Important Disclaimer: This analysis draws from specific documents and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Legal outcomes vary; consult a qualified Malaysian lawyer for case-specific guidance. Typically, direct court inquiries yield the best results.
Stay informed on Malaysian law—bookmark for updates on Shah Alam proceedings!
#ShahAlamCourt, #MalaysianLaw, #CaseSearch
To reconcile the wages paid with Balance Sheet, P&L, Income and Expenditure Statements, one final opportunity of personal hearing was offered on 25.03.2025 vide letter dated 05.03.2025. ... Hence, one more opportunity of personal hearing as offered on 02.05.2023 vide letter dated 19.04.2023. Fr.A.Jesu Marian, correspondent appeared for the hearing on 02.05.2023 and submitted one letter dated 02.05.2023. ... (C).Analysis: 13.Paragraph Nos.15 and 16 of the impugned ord....
Collector for determination of the value or consideration, as the case may be, and the proper duty payable thereon. ... In view of the above facts, I find no reason to interfere with the impugned order, especially by invoking the power of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. ... According to him, the said finding is contrary to what is provided under Section 45B of the Act. Relevant portion of Section 45B reads as follows: “45B. Instruments undervalued how to be dealt with. .......
13. Submissions made by learned counsel for the parties have received the due consideration of the Court. 14. ... In so far the impugned judgment and order of the High Court is concerned, we find that the High Court itself recorded that the appellant had appeared before the corporation through its authorized representative(s) and that relevant records were produced during the course of personal hearings. ... 14.13. Section 82 provides for appeal. As per sub- section (2), an appeal shall lie to the High Court from an order of an Employ....
The statute has fixed a time of five years even in the case of suo motu action by the District Collector. As such, the only possible inference is that if action is to be initiated under Sections 45B (1) and 45B (2), it has to be started at least before the five years. ... According to the petitioner, notices were issued on 17.11.2023, 13.02.2024, 23.02.2024 respectively demanding amounts which are allegedly payable towards deficit stamp duty. ... Suo motu power is granted to ensure that there is no loss of revenue due t....
13. The second issue, arising for consideration in the case at hand, is with reference to the eligibility of the petitioner for the benefits of the exemption under Rule 45B of the KER. ... However, she had crossed the age of 50 years as on 02.05.2016, in which event, she claims the benefits under Rule 45B(4) of the KER, which reads as under: 1987 (2) KLT 555 ], this Court held that a teacher on attaining the age of 50 years, automatically gets exempted from the requirement of qualifications under Rule ....
However, she had crossed the age of 50 years as on 02.05.2016, in which event, she claims the benefits under Rule 45B(4) of the KER, which reads as under: “45B(4). ... 13. The second issue, arising for consideration in the case at hand, is with reference to the eligibility of the petitioner for the benefits of the exemption under Rule 45B of the KER. ... However, the petitioner claims that insofar as she had completed 50 years of age on 02.05.2016, was entitled to ex....
13. The second issue, arising for consideration in the case at hand, is with reference to the eligibility of the petitioner for the benefits of the exemption under Rule 45B of the KER. ... However, she had crossed the age of 50 years as on 02.05.2016, in which event, she claims the benefits under Rule 45B(4) of the KER, which reads as under: “45B(4). ... However, the petitioner claims that insofar as she had completed 50 years of age on 02.05.2016, was entitled to e....
I do not find any illegality in the impugned order, 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case
I find considerable merit in the said contention also. No grounds are made out. The appeal fails and is dismissed. ... Aggrieved by the order of the District Registrar, the respondent approached the Court by filing CMA.No.59 of 2014 under Section 45B of the Kerala Stamp Act. ... Sub Registrar [AIR 2002 Kerala 27], the Court below found that the parties cannot escape from the clutches of Section 45B and the value or consideration should have been truly set forth in the instrument. ... JUSTICE T.R.RAVI ST MONDAY, THE 1 DAY OF DECEMBER #HL_....
The petitioner asserts that she had attained 50 years of age as on 30.05.2018, and hence she is entitled to the benefit of exemption contained in Rule 45B(4) of Chapter XIV A of the KER. ... The date of birth of the petitioner is 31.05.1968 and she attained the age of 50 years on 30.05.2018. This assertion in the writ petition is not disputed. It was by Ext.P1 order that the petitioner was appointed as Headmistress of the M.T. Lower Primary School, Vengoor with effect from 01.06.2019. ... (4) of Chapter XIVA KER and Ext.....
12. On 01.05.2025, police has filed the supplementary status report, disclosing therein, that the information, regarding the antecedents of the applicant, was obtained from Police Station Kupvi and as per the information, no other case is found to have been registered against him. Investigation, in the present case, is stated to be completed and only challan is to be prepared. 13. In the status report, which has been filed on 13.05.2025, similar stand has been taken. 14. On the basis of above facts, a prayer has been made to dismiss the application. 15. As per the stand, ta....
12.Accordingly, the implementation and operation of the order dated 17.04.2025 shall remain stayed. Accordingly, I.A. No.5146 of 2025 stands allowed. 13.List this case on 06.05.2025 at 12.30 PM under the same heading.” 11. This Court is of the opinion that the order dated 17.04.2025 (Annexure-3) on the one hand, is stigmatic in nature and on the other hand, no show-cause has been issued. Further the contention of the State counsel that since one person has been made in-charge, as such, it will create a chaos; is misconceived as one person has only been made in-charge of the....
16. In the aforesaid terms, present petition is disposed of, so also, pending applications, if any. List for compliance on 13.05.2025.
a. on Rs. 10.80 crore, from 18.05.2024 to 18.03.2025; andb. on Rs. 16.20 crore from 23.05.2025 to 18.03.2025. 15. Let the sum on account of interest be paid within 7 (seven) days. 16. We are informed that sale certificate has been issued in favour of GRT Hotels by Edelweiss ARCL. 14. Learned counsel appearing for Edelweiss ARCL has left the rate of interest to be awarded to our discretion. We direct that the sum of Rs.27 crore which has been returned to GBJ Hotels, shall carry interest at the rate of 18% per annum as follows:
7. The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner in BA No. 4374/2025 filed BA No. 2331/2025 earlier which was not entertained. This Court granted permission to move after four weeks. Accordingly, the present bail application is filed. 6. Heard counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor. 9. Moreover, it is a well accepted principle that the bail is the rule and the jail is the exception. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chidambaram. P v Directorate of Enforcement [2019 (16) SCALE 870], after considering all the earlier judgments, observed that, the bas....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
