Supreme Today AI
SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Supreme Court Ruling in Civil Appeal 2345: Resolving Gauhati High Court Writ Petitions

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal 2345 of 2017: Key Ruling Explained

In the realm of Indian jurisprudence, Supreme Court decisions often set pivotal precedents, especially in appeals challenging High Court orders. One such significant ruling pertains to Civil Appeal number 2345, specifically Civil Appeal No. 2345 of 2017 (along with Civil Appeal No. 2346 of 2017). This case highlights the judiciary's role in reviewing appellate decisions from the Gauhati High Court. If you're researching the outcome of this appeal or similar writ petition matters, this post provides a comprehensive breakdown. [

#SupremeCourt #CivilAppeal #LegalRuling
Chat Download
Chat Print
Chat R ALL
Landmark
Strategy
Argument
Risk
Chat Voice Bottom Icon
Chat Sent Bottom Icon

Related Judgments

United States vs Gregory Davis - 2006 Supreme(US)(ca7) 169

2006 Supreme(US)(ca7) 169

Nos. 03-2345 & 03-2915 3 I. ... In his brief to this court, Davis claims that his sentence is unreasonable for a number reasons, all of which are easily dismissed. Davis initially claims that the district court “misunder- stood its authority under Booker.” ... Nos. 03-2345 & 03-2915 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ... Davis attempts to bolster his argument by arguing that Mykytiuk shou....

Arti Kumari Singh and Ors Vs The Patna High Court, Through The Registrar General, Patna High Court and Ors

Patna High Court

Sanjeev Kumar Pandey, son of Janardan Pandey, presently Posted as Sub- Judge-cum-ACJM, Civil Court, Muzaffarpur East, Civil Court, Muzaffarpur, Sadar, Dist- Muzaffarpur Patna High Court CWJC No.2345 ... In that event, the Patna High Court CWJC No.2345 of 2019 dt.18-10-2019 30/31 extention of date for fixing the eligibility criterion for the purposes of attracting more number of Judicial Officers ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction C....

PRAMOD NAMDEV WAJGE vs ROTATING FUNDTHROUGH SUBHASH SHIVAJIRAO GHULE

Bombay High Court - Appellate Side,Bombay

CIVIL ... CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2345 OF 2007 tt

RAJBIR KAUR AND ANOTHER vs JEON SINGH AND ANOTHER

High Court of Punjab and Haryana

Civil Revision No. 2345 of 2011 (O&M) Although, number of opportunities have been granted CR No. 2345 ... CR No. 2345 of 2011 (O&M)

COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION vs UNION OF INDIA THOUGH MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT & ORS

Delhi High Court

We may notice that the DCPCR, vide Sections 14 and 24 of the CPCR Act, while conducting such enquiries has the powers of a Civil Code trying a suit under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and to forward any case to the Magistrate and to ... It cannot also be forgotten that we are also landed with the issue of a large number of street children in the city, who have no other place than such parks to turn to for their entertainment. 15. ... The learned Amicus Curiae, in exemplary discharge of his duties and we must say, at the expense of hi....

COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION vs UNION OF INDIA THOUGH MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT & ORS

Delhi High Court

We may notice that the DCPCR, vide Sections 14 and 24 of the CPCR Act, while conducting such enquiries has the powers of a Civil Code trying a suit under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and to forward any case to the Magistrate and to ... It cannot also be forgotten that we are also landed with the issue of a large number of street children in the city, who have no other place than such parks to turn to for their entertainment. 15. ... The learned Amicus Curiae, in exemplary discharge of his duties and we must say, at the expense of hi....

SHRINIWAS PRABHAKAR KARVE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Bombay High Court - Bench at Aurangabad

Pending Civil Applications, if any, stand be assumed to be the corresponding date after deducting the number ... The petitioner has challenged the said order by filing a separate civil application In rule 38 of the Maharashtra Civil

GREEN AND CLEAN AVES LAND SANSTHAN vs RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION (RIICO)

High Court of Rajasthan - Rajasthan High Court Principal Seat Jodhpur

Civil Writ (P.I.L.) ... In short, the case of the petitioner is that large number of (1 of 4) [CW-2345 ... Petition No. 2345/2021 Green and Clean Aves Land Sansthan, 201, Ashapurna Colony, (2 of 4) [CW-2345

ASHA RANI vs STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana

This Court has dealt with the scope of interference with an order of acquittal in a number of cases." 41. ... CRR-2345-2013 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-2345-2013 (O& ... -2- Sham Lal along with HC Lakhwinder Singh and others reached Civil Hospital, Malout where doctor stated that the injured had been referred. ... After arranging the vehicle, she got her husband admitted in Civil Hospital, Malout from where the doc....

SYED NISSAR AHAMED vs FARHAN AMEEN SULTHAN

Karnataka

PASSED IN R.A.NO.45/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DATED 12.07.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.69/2009 ON THE FILE OF AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT: NO.2345

Director of Primary Education VS Patel Bipinbhai Kolghabhai - 2017 Supreme(Guj) 1320

2017 0 Supreme(Guj) 1320

Petitioners have placed reliance upon the directions given by the learned Single Judge in the said order. It is the grievance of the petitioners that in the meantime the respondent authorities have initiated new recruitment of Head Teachers by advertisement dated 22.01.2017 Therefore, the concerned existing Head Teachers preferred Special Civil Application No. 2345 of 2017. The said petition came to be disposed of by learned Single Judge by an order dated 10.02.2017

Adi Dara Patel VS S. R. Jondhale - 2016 Supreme(Bom) 535

2016 0 Supreme(Bom) 535

The Division Bench also directed that Appeal No. 411 of 2010, Show Cause Notice No. 3115 of 2010 and the captioned writ petition be clubbed together. (o) In September, 2012, Suit No. 2345 of 1983 was transferred to the Bombay City Civil Court (the same was numbered as BCCC Suit No. 7480 of 1983). (ii) The Court Receiver, Bombay High Court is directed to deliver possession of the subject property to the petitioners and their co-owners being the plaintiffs and defendant nos. (p) On 18th March, 2013, Suit No. 2345 of 1983 was decreed and an order and judgment was made holding ....

Adi Dara Patel VS S. R. Jondhale - 2016 Supreme(Bom) 534

2016 0 Supreme(Bom) 534

The Division Bench also directed that Appeal No. 411 of 2010, Show Cause Notice No. 3115 of 2010 and the captioned writ petition be clubbed together. (o) In September, 2012, Suit No. 2345 of 1983 was transferred to the Bombay City Civil Court (the same was numbered as BCCC Suit No. 7480 of 1983). (p) On 18th March, 2013, Suit No. 2345 of 1983 was decreed and an order and judgment was made holding that:- (i) The agreement and conveyance dated 15th September, 1983 executed in favour of RBI are to be cancelled and set aside. (ii) The Court Receiver, Bombay High Court is direct....

Paresh Sharma VS State of Rajasthan - 2012 Supreme(Raj) 2318

2012 0 Supreme(Raj) 2318

"The suspension of an employee, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case may be desired urgently or on emergent basis but in those circumstances also the competent authority must record its satisfaction for exercising powers under Rule 13. The same view was taken by this Court in Subhash Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2345/2011) decided on 3.9.2012, wherein it was held that:- If such satisfaction is not recorded and suspension is made merely on basis of the instructions given in circulars or merely by a word of mouth or by slip o....

Narendra Kumar Mishra VS Binapani Sarangi - 2008 Supreme(Ori) 341

2008 0 Supreme(Ori) 341

5. Admittedly the marriage between the appellant and the respondent took place in the year 1971 and by the year 1985 they had been blessed with five children out of whom four are daugh¬ters and one is a son stated to be mentally retarded. The appellant exam¬ined four witnesses and the respondent also examined four wit¬nesses before the Court below. Admittedly the Civil Proceeding was initiated at the instance of the appel¬lant on the ground of desertion and cruelty.

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

WhatsApp Telegram Instagram Icon X YouTube Facebook LinkedIn

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon