Re Will of Yap Kwan Seng: Essential Insights into Malaysian Estate Law

Keane 1919 AC 815 was not cited in the case of in Re Yap Kwan Seng 4 FMSLR 313 The case of Bourne v. Keane 1919 AC 815 established that a bequest for Masses is not superstitious and further it seems a charitable purpose. ... No FMS case, or any other Colony case could be found to declare a bequest of this nature was for a superstitious use. The case of Re Yap Kwan Seng, 4 FMSLR 313 was quoted by....

Keane 1919 AC 815 was not cited in the case of in Re Yap Kwan Seng 4 FMSLR 313 The case of Bourne v. Keane 1919 AC 815 established that a bequest for Masses is not superstitious and further it seems a charitable purpose. ... No FMS case, or any other Colony case could be found to declare a bequest of this nature was for a superstitious use. The case of Re Yap Kwan Seng, 4 FMSLR 313 was quoted by....

Keane 1919 AC 815 was not cited in the case of in Re Yap Kwan Seng 4 FMSLR 313 The case of Bourne v. Keane 1919 AC 815 established that a bequest for Masses is not superstitious and further it seems a charitable purpose. ... No FMS case, or any other Colony case could be found to declare a bequest of this nature was for a superstitious use. The case of Re Yap Kwan Seng, 4 FMSLR 313 was quoted by....

High Court Malaya, Kuala Lumpur

Keane 1919 AC 815 was not cited in the case of in Re Yap Kwan Seng 4 FMSLR 313 The case of Bourne v. Keane 1919 AC 815 established that a bequest for Masses is not superstitious and further it seems a charitable purpose. ... The case of Re Yap Kwan Seng, 4 FMSLR 313 was quoted by me as an authority that the English rule against Perpetuities applied to the FMS in which Mr. Sproule, J followed the Colony cases of Yeap Cheah Neo v. On....

On the facts of the case it would appear that the Defendant was under the mistaken belief that he himself could receive the commission of 2% in effecting the sale of the Jalan Yap Kwan Seng land. ... Kwan Seng Lands as declared for the purposes of Estate Duty and the actual price that the Lands were sold; (b) Item 201 The commission paid to one PR.VR Sethu Chettiar (Sethu) in Singapore Dollars equivalent to RM255, 000.00 in respect of the sale of the Yap K....

On the facts of the case it would appear that the Defendant was under the mistaken belief that he himself could receive the commission of 2% in effecting the sale of the Jalan Yap Kwan Seng land. ... Among the properties of the said Joint Hindu Family were 3 pieces of land, one in Kajang, one in Seremban and another one in Jalan Yap Kwan Seng Seng, Kuala Lumpur. ... Between the period August 1979 and June 1982 the Kajang Estate land, the Seremban Es....

High Court Malaya, Kuala Lumpur

On the facts of the case it would appear that the Defendant was under the mistaken belief that he himself could receive the commission of 2% in effecting the sale of the Jalan Yap Kwan Seng land. ... Among the properties of the said Joint Hindu Family were 3 pieces of land, one in Kajang, one in Seremban and another one in Jalan Yap Kwan Seng Seng, Kuala Lumpur. After the Defendant became the "Karta" these 3 pieces of land were sold during the perio....

On the facts of the case it would appear that the Defendant was under the mistaken belief that he himself could receive the commission of 2% in effecting the sale of the Jalan Yap Kwan Seng land. ... Among the properties of the said Joint Hindu Family were 3 pieces of land, one in Kajang, one in Seremban and another one in Jalan Yap Kwan Seng Seng, Kuala Lumpur. ... Between the period August 1979 and June 1982 the Kajang Estate land, the Seremban Es....

FACTS AND CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS The defendant's address stated in the writ was No. 5 Persiaran Lidcol, Off Jalan Yap Kwan Seng, 50450 Kuala Lumpur, which was its then registered address (the Yap Kwan Seng address). ... It is my judgment that since the company search from the ROC shows that the business address of the defendant was the Yap Kwan Seng address and the registered address as the Kampung Pandan address, RK Consultant Sdn ....

High Court Malaya Kuala Lumpur

Facts And Chronology Of Events [2] The defendant's address stated in the writ was No 5, Persiaran Lidcol, Off Jalan Yap Kwan Seng, 50450 Kuala Lumpur, which was then its registered address ('the Yap Kwan Seng address'). ... It is my judgment that since the company search from the ROC shows that the business address of the defendant was the Yap Kwan Seng address and the registered address as the Kampung Pandan address, RK Consultant....

2020 4 Supreme 405

12 Professor Seng is an Associate Professor at the National University of Singapore; Daniel K B Seng, Computer output as evidence, Sing JLS 139 (1997).] 20. 11 Professor Tapper is a well-known authority on law of evidence; Colin Tapper, Reform of the law of evidence in relation to the output from computers, 3 IntlJ L & Info Tech 87 (1995). This is how the position was explained in Castle vs. Cross, [1984] But the underlying theory on the basis of which academicians critiqued the above judgment is that wherever the production of the output was made possible without human int....

2017 0 Supreme(Megh) 27

3. The crematorium shall be confined to the area (30x30 square feet) as per the allotment made by the San Kur Khatwei Kur, Prior to the commencing of the construction work of the crematorium, the members of the Dorbar Shnong and the Seng Khasi Mylliem shall conduct a joint inspection. After a threadbare discussion, the meeting unanimously resolved to allow the Seng Khasi Mylliem to utilize the allotted space at Iew Mylliem Rim with the following terms and conditions: The site is just above the Mylliem Stream and is reasonably away from human habitation. The other crematorium site identified ....

2011 0 Supreme(P&H) 343

4. Dispute in the present case revolves around the alleged 'Will' of Nar Singh Dass i.e. deceased. As per petitioner/accused Nar Singh Dass i.e. deceased has executed valid 'Will' in her favour since she is the second wife of Nar Singh Dass. While according to the complainant, she is not legally married second wife of Nar Singh Dass and Nar Singh Dass has not executed any 'Will' in favour of the petitioner rather complainant has inherited the property of Nar Singh Dass being the natural legal heir and also on the basis of 'Will' executed by Nar Singh Dass.

2009 0 Supreme(Bom) 1042

A Probate of Administration of the Last Will of the deceased Smt.Umabai Sadashiv Karandikar dated 20.04.1986 be issued in accordance with law.

2006 0 Supreme(Raj) 1069

The case relates to the validity of the will of the deceased Chanan Singh. Brief facts, which are necessary to dispose of this appeal, are recapitulated as under: The relationship between the parties is as follows. The deceased Chanan Singh, s/o Hira Singh died on 6.2.1969.