AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
Legal and administrative frameworks governing the migration of PWD and other reserved category candidates to the general category are complex and evolving. Court rulings emphasize the importance of merit, constitutional principles of equality, and procedural fairness. While migration from reserved to unreserved categories is permissible under certain conditions, it must adhere to prescribed procedures, ensuring vacancies are filled appropriately without violating reservation policies. The classifications for mining and environmental clearances illustrate the importance of precise categorization for regulatory compliance. Overall, the legal landscape aims to balance reservation policies with meritocracy and constitutional mandates.

Search Results for "Circular Regarding Migration of Pwd Category to General Category"

Dipendu Biswas vs The State of West Bengal & Ors.

2024 Supreme(Online)(HC) 2049 India - Calcutta

Soumen Sen, Uday Kumar, JJ

migration of candidates from OBC-A to unreserved PWD-LV category - The principles of horizontal and vertical reservations were discussed ... ... ... Issues: The key issues revolved around the legitimacy of candidate category migration and application of horizontal reservation ... category. ... It is submitted that since Reja did not apply under Unreserved PWD-LV category, his candidature could not have been considered under the said categ....

Rajasthan High Court VS Rajat Yadav

2025 0 Supreme(SC) 2119 India - Supreme Court

DIPANKAR DATTA, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

reserved category candidates should not be confined to their category when outscoring general candidates, ensuring constitutional ... candidates securing higher marks than General category were unjustly excluded, violating equality principles. ... (Paras 25-26) ... ... Issues: Whether reserving posts for General category breaches constitutional ... The 1989 Rules do not contain any provision regarding migration of reserved #HL_STA....

Union of India VS G.  Kiran

2026 0 Supreme(SC) 16 India - Supreme Court

J. K. MAHESHWARI, VIJAY BISHNOI

... ... (D) Court clarifies that relaxation in Preliminary Examination bars unreserved cadre claims from reserved category candidates ... 13, 14, and 17 - Dispute over cadre allocation in Indian Forest Service - High Court's ruling on treating reserved candidate as general ... In the instant case, the State Government in supersession of its earlier policy decision regarding treatment to be given to the candidates belonging to reserved category who are selected against unreserved category vacancies, iss....

Akshay Ashok Chaudhari VS Government of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary

2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 1463 India - Bombay

NITIN JAMDAR, MANJUSHA DESHPANDE

Constitutional validity - SEBC Act declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court - State directed to allow candidates to apply under EWS category ... recruitment were not fundamentally altered, and candidates were not disadvantaged by the inclusion of SEBC candidates in the EWS category ... reservations for Maratha community; challenged in court and declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, leading to a legal dispute regarding ... The Advertisements specified, in a table, the posts needed to be filled, with reservations allocated f....

Dipak Kumar Jagubhai Patel Son Of Jagubhai Narsinhbhai Rohit VS Union Of India

2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 2231 India - Bombay

S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, R.I.CHAGLA

The respondent applied for selection to the post and after scrutiny of 114 applications that were received, it was found that three candidates belonging to the General category and two from the ST category were eligible. ... The merit position No.1, in the SC category, is one Ms Tejalben Rohit. She has secured merit position at No.28. She was adjusted against the general seat. She gave up her claim to the sole reserved seat. ... It is not disputed that the said priority shall be applicable to candidates....

Cauvery Neervala Aathara Pathukappau Sangam vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

2012 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 1 India - BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

R. Banumathi, G.M. Akbar Ali, JJ

Category 'A' consists of mining in an area of more than fifty hectares. Category 'B' consists of mining in an area of less than fifty hectares. Category 'B' consists of two sub-categories viz., 'B1' - less than fifty hectares and 'B2' -five hectares or less. 29. ... We also find force in the submissions of the learned Additional Advocate General. ... Category 'A' projects - more than fifty hectares mining of both major and minor minerals are considered at the Central level in MoEF and required environme....

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE VS UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS AND CLIMATE CHANGE

2021 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 999 India - National Green Tribunal CHENNAI (SOUTHERN ZONE BENCH)

No. 3977(E) dt. 14.08.2018 schedule 1(c) B(ii), the threshold limit of the category ’B’ has been revised as >2000Ha and <50,000ha of cca. The CCA for this project is 1639.08Ha which is less than 2000 Ha. ... No. 3977(E) Dt. 14.08.2018 schedule 1(c) B(ii), the threshold limit of the category "B" has been revised as > 2000Ha and <50,000ha of cca. The CCA for this project is 1639.08Ha which is less than 2000 Ha. ... In such circumstances, based on the statutory provisions of the EIA Notification 2006 and its amendments, the project under the catego....

MRINAL THAKUR vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

2023 Supreme(Online)(HP) 14572 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA

from the reserved (specified category) to the unreserved g (open category) slot is possible, based on meritorious performance; (iii) In case of migration from reserved to open category, the vacancy in the reserved category should be filled by another person from the same specified ... Handicapped candidate have not been further classified as belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and general category candidates.” ... The features of vertical reservations are:....

Cauvery Neervala Aathara Pathukappau Sangam  Rep. by its Secretary  Erode vs Government of Tamil Nadu  Rep. by its Chief Secretary

2012 0 Supreme(Mad) 4988 India - BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

R.BANUMATHI, G.M.AKBAR ALI

Category 'A' consists of mining in an area of more than fifty hectares. Category 'B' consists of mining in an area of less than fifty hectares. Category 'B' consists of two sub-categories viz., 'B1' - less than fifty hectares and 'B2' -five hectares or less. 29. ... We also find force in the submissions of the learned Additional Advocate General. ... Category 'A' projects - more than fifty hectares mining of both major and minor minerals are considered at the Central level in MoEF and required environme....

AKSHAY ASHOK CHAUDHARI  AND ORS vs GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA THR PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS

2023 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 26549 India - High Court of Bombay

Nitin Jamdar, SMT Manjushaajay Deshpande, JJ

The Advertisements specified, in a table, the posts needed to be filled, with reservations allocated for each category. Clause 4 outlined general conditions regarding the number of posts and reservations. ... The Advertisements first specified the table of the posts was to be filled in, and posts were reserved for each category. Then the general conditions regarding the number of posts and the reservation were prescribed. ... /Circular retrospectively applying EWS res....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top