Back
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
R.BANUMATHI, G.M.AKBAR ALI
Cauvery Neervala Aathara Pathukappau Sangam Rep. by its Secretary Erode – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Chief Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners allege environmental violations in sand quarrying. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. government asserts proper control over sand quarrying. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. petitioners raise concerns on permissions and environmental risks. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. supreme court mandates environmental clearance for sand mining. (Para 30 , 32 , 34) |
| 5. final order mandates environmental clearances for quarry operations. (Para 59) |
W.P.(MD)No.4699 of 2012 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the Respondents from carrying the sand quarrying operations along the stretches of rivers, Cauvery and Killidam, which runs through Karur, Trichy, Thanjavur, Nagapattinam and Thiruvarur Districts.
W.P.(MD)No.8111 of 2012 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the Respondents from constructing the grvel road in the middle of the Kollidam River in between Thalakkudi Toll Gate to Anbil Village of an extent of 25 kms.
W.P.(MD)No.8131 of 2012 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the Respondents from carrying the sand quarry operations
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
