Rejection of Claims Due to Lack of Computerized Khatauni
Several sources highlight that rejecting claims solely on the grounds of non-provision of computerized khatauni is considered against the spirit of beneficial provisions. Courts and authorities emphasize that technicalities should not unjustly deny legitimate claims, especially when the khatauni is available in non-computerized form or has been subsequently provided. For instance, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Thru Divisional Manager VS Sunita Devi - Allahabad, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Thru Divisional Manager VS Abhishek Kumar - Allahabad, and Oriental Insurance Company Limited VS Urmila - Allahabad discuss that the absence of a computerized khatauni alone does not render a claim wholly illegal or invalid, particularly if the original or manual records are available or if the documents are furnished later.
Legal and Contractual Provisions Regarding Khatauni
The agreements involved often specify that a computerized khatauni is required for claim processing (Clause 4), but courts have observed that the requirement should not lead to unfair rejection if the manual or original records are accessible or if the computerized version is later submitted. The courts have also noted that the purpose of such clauses is to facilitate transparency and accuracy, not to create insurmountable barriers.
Role of Computerized Khatauni in Land and Revenue Disputes
The computerized khatauni is crucial in land revenue and ownership disputes. It provides official, digitized records of landholdings, which are often used as primary evidence in legal proceedings. Several cases, such as Manager, Birju Yadav, Inarman Yadav Purva Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Chakaundhi VS State of U. P. - Allahabad and ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. VS SITA DEVI - Allahabad, illustrate that the computerized khatauni helps establish land ownership, rectify discrepancies, and uphold the integrity of revenue records.
Procedural Aspects and Challenges
Some sources, like ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. VS SITA DEVI - Allahabad, mention delays or procedural issues in providing computerized khatauni, leading to delayed claims or grievances. The timely furnishing and verification of these records are essential for smooth claim processing and dispute resolution.
Judicial Perspective and Beneficial Approach
Courts generally adopt a liberal approach, emphasizing that technicalities should not overshadow substantive justice. When computerized khatauni records are produced or subsequently provided, claims should not be rejected outright, especially if the records are authentic and relevant. This approach aligns with the broader principle of fairness and the intent behind digitization efforts.
The collected sources underscore that computerized khatauni serves as an important official record for land and revenue matters, and its absence should not automatically invalidate claims or legal proceedings. The courts advocate for a pragmatic approach, prioritizing the substantive merits of cases over procedural technicalities, provided the relevant records are ultimately produced and verified. The digitization of khatauni aims to enhance transparency, but procedural flexibility remains essential to uphold justice.
References:
- Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Thru Divisional Manager VS Sunita Devi - Allahabad
- Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Thru Divisional Manager VS Abhishek Kumar - Allahabad
- Oriental Insurance Company Limited VS Urmila - Allahabad
- RAJVEER VS SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE DADRI, DISTRICT GAUTAM BUDH NAGAR - Allahabad
- ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. VS SITA DEVI - Allahabad
- Manager, Birju Yadav, Inarman Yadav Purva Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Chakaundhi VS State of U. P. - Allahabad
- COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad
- COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT, SAMANVIT VIKASJUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, ALIGARH VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad
- NATTHI LAL AND 6 OTHERS Vs State - Allahabad
- Saransh Sharma VS State of U. P. - Allahabad
It highlights that rejection of claim on the ground of non-provision of computerized khatauni is against the spirit of the beneficial ... Ratio Decidendi: Claims should not be rejected on mere technicalities; Non-provision of computerized khatauni ... khatauni; Imposition of maximum penalty under Clause 22(b) of the Agreement. ... It is further submitted that as per Clause 4 of the Agreement, the documents mentioned in said clause are required to be produced to the petitioner-Insurance Company for clai....
khatauni but claimants had failed to provide computerized khatauni to petitioner therefore, their claims were liable to be rejected ... Agreement - Computerized Khatauni - Claim Process - Petitioner have submitted that judgments passed by Permanent ... khatauni was required for purpose of claim and hence it cannot be said that rejection of claim on said ground is wholly illegal ... It is further submitted that as per the Clause 2 of the Agreement, there is no such requirement of provid....
(A) Writ jurisdiction—Invoked against order to expunge the entries recorded in the computerized Khatauni pertaining to 1412-F to ... Khatauni pertaining to 1412-F to 1417-F. ... compromise allegedly consummated between them—Inquiry report, just and proper—Authority below rightly expunged the entries made in computerized
khatauni for claim process and the imposition of penalty under Clause 22(b). ... Clause 4 and 22(b) - [Clause 4, Clause 22(b)] - The court discussed the applicability of Clause 4 of the Agreement which required computerized ... As per Clause 4 of the agreement, the computerized khatauni was required for the purpose of the claim and hence it cannot be said that rejection of claim on the said ground is wholly illegal. ... The petitioner-insurance company was under impression that as per clause 4, the claim of those persons....
The return of the claim to the District Magistrate after the computerized khatauni was furnished by the revenue authorities on 1.8.2010 seems unquestionable which clearly reflects that the case at hand is of delayed payment. ... Later on, a computerized copy of the khatauni was forwarded by the revenue authorities alongwith the claim on 1.8.2010 but for the reasons best known, the claimant’s grievance was not redressed timely. ... 8. ... As per clause 16 of the agreement, it is the duty of the insurance company to relea....
He has drawn our attention to the computerized khatauni which is produced as Annexure No. 3 in the writ petition in which Plot No. 192 besides Plot Nos. 194 and 193 was originally recorded in the name of Ram Awadh son of Narman, the person in whose name the society exists and the land has subsequently ... The khatauni clearly demonstrates that the land of Plot No. 192 in the fasli year of 1409 exists in revenue village, Chakaudi. ... copy of Revenue Extract/Annual Register relating the land in question as there appeared to be difference i....
Thereupon, a Letter dated 5.5.2007 alongwith computerized copy of the Khatauni (Annexure RA-4 to the said Rejoinder Affidavit) bearing legible signature and stamp of the issuing authority was submitted by the petitioners. ... Again, Sri Khare urges, in response to the Communication dated 4.5.2007 issued by the Regional Assistant Director of Education (Basic), Agra Region, Agra, a Letter dated 5.5.2007 alongwith computerized copy of the Khatauni bearing legible signature and stamp of the issuing authority was submitted. .....
Thereupon, a Letter dated 5.5.2007 alongwith computerized copy of the Khatauni (Annexure RA-4 to the said Rejoinder Affidavit) bearing legible signature and stamp of the issuing authority was submitted by the petitioners. ... Again, Sri Khare urges, in response to the Communication dated 4.5.2007 issued by the Regional Assistant Director of Education (Basic), Agra Region, Agra, a Letter dated 5.5.2007 alongwith computerized copy of the Khatauni bearing legible signature and stamp of the issuing authority was submitted. .....
LAND REVENUE - ANCESTRAL PROPERTY - ONLINE COMPUTERIZED OFFICIAL WEBSITE Fact of the Case: The petitioners filed ... direction to the respondent authorities to consider their application and to uphold their names over the land in dispute in the online computerized ... (e) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to uphold the names of the petitioners over the land in dispute in online computerized official website ... of the department in Khewat/K....
of 2013 relating to sale of certain plots of Khatauni Khata No.214 of village Mant Raja Bangar, Tehsil Mant, District Mathura, deficiency of stamp duty of Rs.4,69,950/- was determined and a penalty of Rs.18,71,800/- was imposed. ... Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that by order dated 27.12.2014 in Stamp Case No.84 of 2013-14 (Computerized Case No.D2013015000171) passed by the respondent No.3 under Section 47A(3) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (hereinafter referred to as ''the Act') with respect to Instrument No.1651
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.