AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Debashis Sinha v. R.N.R. Enterprise (2023) SCC 195 - The court emphasized the importance of providing employees with a reasonable opportunity to inspect records and defend themselves during disciplinary proceedings. Lack of fixed dates for enquiry or access to records can invalidate proceedings, underscoring the necessity of fairness in administrative and judicial processes Achyuta Samanta VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand.

  • Validity of Disciplinary Proceedings & Opportunity to Inspect Records - Courts have highlighted that disciplinary actions must adhere to principles of natural justice, including giving employees a fair chance to inspect records and respond. Absence of such opportunities can render proceedings invalid, as seen in judgments referencing Saroj Kumar Sinha AIR 2010 SC 3131 and Breen v. Amalgamated Engg.

  • Judicial Review of Sanction Orders - Orders refusing sanctions are subject to judicial review, which depends on whether the authority applied its mind properly and considered relevant material. Orders lacking due application of mind can be quashed, emphasizing the importance of transparency and diligence Debashis Mahapatra Son of Late Kishore Mohan Mahapatra VS Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited - Jharkhand.

  • Quashing of Cases & Falsification of Records - Several cases involve quashing criminal proceedings or revising orders where investigations found falsification or irregularities in record-keeping, such as in Debasis Das's case. The acceptance of explanations by investigating agencies can influence judicial decisions to quash cases Pramod Kumar Swain VS State Of Orissa - Orissa.

  • Legal Provisions & Court's Reliance on Precedents - Courts have relied on Supreme Court judgments, like Usha Sinha, to interpret legal provisions concerning execution of decrees and obstructing justice, highlighting errors committed by courts in procedural adherence and emphasizing adherence to settled legal principles Kamala Devi Ajitsaria, W/o. Late Rukmanand Ajitsaria VS Seema Devi Patni, W/o. Sri Makhan Lal Patni - Gauhati.

  • Judicial Oversight & Compliance - Orders directing filing compliance reports and producing relevant records demonstrate courts' active role in ensuring procedural correctness and accountability in administrative and judicial proceedings Debashis Ganguly vs Union of India - Central Administrative Tribunal.

  • Main Insight: Across these sources, the central theme is the importance of fairness, transparency, and adherence to legal procedures in judicial and administrative actions involving Debashis Sinha. Courts consistently emphasize the right to inspect records, proper application of mind, and procedural fairness as crucial for the validity of proceedings.

References: - Supreme Court judgments: AIR 2010 SC 3131, (2023) 3 SCC 195, (2008) 7 SCC 144 - Case-specific orders and quashings - Principles of natural justice and judicial review

Search Results for "Debashis Sinha Judicial Records"

Sunita Srivastava VS New & Renewable Energy Development Agency Up Vibhuti

2015 0 Supreme(All) 3795 India - Allahabad

ANIL KUMAR

validity of disciplinary proceedings during deemed deputation, absence of fixed date for enquiry, lack of opportunity to inspect records ... importance of providing a reasonable opportunity to the employee, including access to relevant documents and the right to inspect records ... Saroj Kumar Sinha AIR 2010 SC 3131, Breen Vs. Amalgamated Engg. ... The inscrutable face of the sphinx' is ordinarily incongruous with a judicial or quasi-judicial performance." ... 19. Hon'ble the Apex Court in the case of ....

Achyuta Samanta VS State of Jharkhand

2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1254 India - Jharkhand

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

The court also referred to the judgment in Debashis Sinha v. R.N.R. Enterprise; [(2023) 3 SCC 195] to support its decision. ... A reference may be made to the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Debashis Sinha v. R.N.R. Enterprise; [(2023) 3 SCC 195]. Paragraph 16 of the said judgment is quoted hereinbelow: “16. ... This petition has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding arising out of Complaint Case No.2719 of 2021 including the order taking cognizance dated 12.07.2022, pending in the court ....

Debashis Paul VS Commandant, CISF Unit, D. S. P, Durgapur

2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 623 India - Calcutta

SAMAPTI CHATTERJEE

Enhancement to Dismissal - Suo-Moto Revision - Validity - Compliance with Rules - Opportunity to Defend - Proportionality of Punishment - Judicial ... Considering the submissions advanced by the learned Advocates appearing for the parties and after perusing the records and also considering the citations (State of Uttar Pradesh and Others, Shobha Sinha, Dev Singh and Kartick Chandra Ghosh (supra) relied on by Mr. ... It is also evident from the records that in the FIR only the name is mentioned not the constable number. .....

Pramod Kumar Swain VS State Of Orissa

2021 0 Supreme(Ori) 230 India - Orissa

SASHIKANTA MISHRA

Debasis Das, Mr. T. ... Case No. 21 of 2002 of the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Balasore are hereby quashed. In view of the aforesaid order, no specific order is required to be passed in CRLREV No. 1453 of 2010 and CRLMC No.1616 of 2021, which are therefore, disposed of accordingly. ... Similarly, it is alleged that he falsified the records to show as if he had lifted the stock even though he had not which amounts to the offence under Section 468 of IPC. ... Now, when the Investigating Agency itself accepts the explanation....

Debashis Mahapatra Son of Late Kishore Mohan Mahapatra VS Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited

2016 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1053 India - Jharkhand

RAVI NATH VERMA

An order refusing to grant sanction may attract judicial review by the superior courts. ... 7. Validity of an order of sanction would depend upon application of mind on the part of the authority concerned and the material placed before it. ... It appears from the record that a Public Interest Litigation bearing no. C.W.J.C. no. 1793 of 2001 was filed before this Court, which was heard along with W.P.(PIL)no. 4611 of 2009 and W.P. ... ... It is also alleged that P.K.Sinha, the then Electrical Executive Engineer, APDRP, put notice in the f....

Debashis Nandy VS Union Of India

2019 0 Supreme(Cal) 268 India - Calcutta

PROTIK PRAKASH BANERJEE

Fact of the Case: The writ petitioner challenged the manner in which the second respondent records data regarding citizens ... ... (2) No court inferior to that of a Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or a Chief Judicial Magistrate shall try any offence punishable under this Act.” ... 43. ... The writ petitioner has challenged the cavalier manner in which the second respondent records date relating to citizens in India. ... However, the issue which seeks judicial determination before this Court is not one which pertains to....

DEBASHISH SINHA S/O ALOK KUMAR SINHA VS STATE OF KARNATAKA

2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 444 India - Karnataka

M. NAGAPRASANNA

Persons responsible for my daughter’s death are: (1) Debashis Sinha - President PLH HOA & other governing body members. (2) Javed Shafiq Rao - Senior Vice President, Prestige Property Management System. ... No. 3071 of 2024 pending before the II Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru Rural District arising out of a crime in Crime No. 74 of 2024 registered for offences punishable under Sections 149 and 304 of the IPC. 2. Heard Sri Sandesh J. ... I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the respective learn....

ARUN KUMAR SINHA VS STATE

1995 0 Supreme(Cal) 217 India - Calcutta

ARUN KUMAR DUTTA

The Petitioner-accused was arrested in connection therewith and produced before the judicial magistrate, Sealdah, and was granted bail by the Court. ... Let a copy of this Order and the lower court records be sent down to the Court below forthwith for compliance with this Order. Application disposed of. ... The learned Judge is directed to fix another firm date within four weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this Order and the lower court records for completion of inspection of the remaining relevant documents by the accused, d....

Kamala Devi Ajitsaria, W/o.  Late Rukmanand Ajitsaria VS Seema Devi Patni, W/o.  Sri Makhan Lal Patni

2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 556 India - Gauhati

DEVASHIS BARUAH

highlights the legal provisions and interpretations of Rule 102, and the court's reliance on the Supreme Court's judgment in Usha Sinha ... to resist or obstruct execution of a decree passed by a competent court, as established in the Supreme Court's judgment in Usha Sinha ... Dina Ram and Others reported in (2008) 7 SCC 144 and submitted that the learned Executing Court committed grave error of law which should shock the judicial conscience of this Court inasmuch as the law being well settled, the continuation of the proceedings filed by....

Debashis Ganguly vs Union of India

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 13007 India - Central Administrative Tribunal

Urmita Datta Sen, J, Anindo Majumdar, ACJ

A compliance report was also directed to be filed before the appropriate judicial forum under intimation to the Board. ... ORDER Urmita Datta (Sen), Judicial Member: The applicants have preferred this O.A. under Section 19 of a href="./.. ... granted to the holders of the equivalent/analogous/comparable posts of Income Tax Department who were also granted the upgraded Pay Scales on the basis of the same Office Memorandum dated 21.04.2004; d) An order directing the respondents to produce/cause production of all relevant records ... In th....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top