draft a invitation to all community members on 31 jury

Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress VS State of Madhya Pradesh - 06 Apr 11

India - Supreme Court

-A(1)(a) – Further, allotment of land almost two years prior to the notification under Section 23-A(1)(a) and there being no nexus ... an invitation or advertisement by the State or its agency/instrumentality. ... writ petition on the ground of being contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution and the provisions of the ... where a judg....

Gali Muddu Krishnam Naidu, M. L. A. Puttur, Chittoor District VS Government of A. P, rep. by its chief Secretary, Hyderabad - 31 Oct 94

India - Andhra Pradesh

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a public interest litigation challenging the grant of Letters of Intent (LOIs) to two ... the grant of Letters of Intent (LOIs) to two companies, GVK Industries Ltd. and Brooklyn Energy Limited, for the establishment of ... The court held that there was no evidence of actual bias or mala fide on the part of the Chief Minister or the Chief Secretary. ... The IPC meetings ....

Rajendra Prasad: Kunjukunju Janardhanan: Sheo Shanker Dubey VS State Of U. P. : State Of Kerala: State Of U. P. - 09 Feb 79

India - Supreme Court

the lesser punishment – Court has to take into consideration all the circumstances which do not merit the extreme penalty – Court ... of the murderous assault – All these facts and circumstances, to my mind constitute special reasons why the accused should be sentenced ... criminality and desirability to impose such punishment as a measure of social necessity, as a mean....

Sub Committee On Judicial Accountability: Raj Birbal VS Union Of India: Rabi Ray - 29 Oct 91

India - Supreme Court

a motion for removal of a Judge in either House of Parliament are at all justiciable before Courts of law - Held, Constitutional ... notification the two sitting Judges cannot take time off from their Court-work - Union Government seeks to justify its stand on its ... understanding that both the motion given notice of by Members of the Lok Sabha for presenting an Address to#HL_....

RAJEEV SURI VS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY - 05 Jan 21

India - Supreme Court

Hall has a seating capacity of only 440 persons - That already falls short of present need to accommodate members of both Houses ... EAC with a request that they may decide question on environment clearance within a period of 30 days from date copy of this order ... not comment on merits - These are complex and esoteric issues which have to be at first....

Bachan Singh VS State of Punjab - 16 Aug 82

India - Supreme Court

. – Court ruled that even if a low seeks to deprive a person of his property under Article 31, it must still, in order to be valid ... affect any of the rights guaranteed under that Article. – That is a question on which I do not wish to express any definite opinion ... It this be the true position in regard to the inter-relation betw....

Bachan Singh: Mal Singh: Sunil Batra: Nathu Singh: Kartar Singh And Ujagar Singh: Sher Singh: Sunil Batra: Mal Singh: Nirpal Singh: Jagmohan Singh: Ujjagar Singh VS State Of Punjab: Union Of India: Union Of India: Union Of India: Delhi Administration: State Of Punjab: Delhi Administration: State Of Haryana: State Of Haryana: State Of Haryana: State Of Punjab - 09 May 80

India - Supreme Court

... -held, it is reasonable to place on the State the burden to prove ... OF PROOF OF—REASONABLENESS OF STATE ... -held, Constitution is not a ... and dangerous members of the community why should the accident of having committed a capital offence determine who should be selected ... the House of Lords threw out the Bill, the majority on one occasion i....

JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) VS UNION OF INDIA - 24 Aug 17

India - Supreme Court

secure to all citizens justice, liberty, equality and fraternity – Dignified existence to the individual – Adoption of a democratic ... The issue reaches out to the foundation of a constitutional culture based on the protection of human rights. ... law infringing fundamental rights to be tested not with reference to the object of stat....

Union Carbide Corporation VS Union Of India - 03 Oct 91

India - Supreme Court

thereon decide whether or not to convert it into a decree But on a mere possibility of there being a shortfall, a possibility not ... supported by any realistic appraisal of the material on record but on a mere apprehension quia time it would not be proper to saddle ... exercise of power under Article 142 of Constitu....

Nimeshbhai Bharatbhai Desai VS State of Gujarat - 02 Apr 18

India - Gujarat

the offence under sections 376(a), 377, 498(A) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code – Held, Ground on which the transfer is prayed for ... Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 376(a), 377, 498(A) and 114 – FIR Quashment – Criminal Misc. ... to look into is the grievance of the victim that the first information report was not reduced into writing according to what was ... Naz ....

Sushil Ansal VS State Through CBI - 05 Mar 14

India - Supreme Court

All the sentences were directed to run concurrently. The Trial Court further convicted S.S. Sharma (A-13) and N.D. ... in regard to other persons including Amod Kanth DCP(L) for allowing the cinema to function on temporary permits and for not ... Dandona (A-12) Executive Engineer, PWD and Surender Dutt (A-16) Station Officer, Delhi Fire Service, #HL_S....

TOFAN SINGH VS STATE OF TAMIL NADU - 29 Oct 20

India - Supreme Court

Excise who are otherwise invested with all powers of investigation so as to attract provisions of Section 25 ... be referred to the larger Bench, inasmuch as it is intermixed with a facet of the 1st issue as to whether such a statement is to ... – Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 25 – Confessional statement – Legal bar on ... from challenge #HL_STA....

S. P. Gupta: V. M. Tarkunde: J. L. Kalra: Iqbal M. Chagla: Lily Thomas: A. Rajappa: Union Of India: D. N. Pandey: R. Prasad Sinha VS Union Of India: Union Of India: Union Of India: P. Shivshankar: Union Of India: Union Of India: P. Subramanian: Union Of India: K. B. N. Singh - 30 Dec 81

India - Supreme Court

For that purpose I will be going to Allahabad on December 31. ... which the invitation to inaugurate the conference was accepted. ... The petitioner was appointed acting governor of Bihar from 31/01/1979 to Septem- ber 31, 1979.

AKHIL BHARTIYA UPBHOKTA CONGRESS vs STAET OF M.P. . - 06 Apr 11

India - Supreme Court

discretion to order jury trial. ... Section 14 casts a duty on the Director of Town and Country Planning to p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:0;padding:0;top:426pt

His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadgalvaru VS State of Kerala - 24 Apr 73

India - Supreme Court

Santhanam, one of the members of the Constituent Assembly moved an amendment on April 29, 1947 to clause (2) of the draft submitted ... some of the speeches made by the members of the Constituent Assembly in the course of debates on the draft Constitution. ... some of the speeches made by the members of the Constituent Assembly in the course of debates....

BACHAN SINGH ETC. ETC. vs STATE OF PUNJAB ETC. ETC. - 16 Aug 82

India - Supreme Court

in a companion case, ’A jury must be allowed to consider on the basis of all relevant evidence not only why a death sentence should ... to eliminate useless and dangerous members of the community why should the accident of having committed a capital offence determine ... by the condition in the #HL_....

DILIP GUHA vs STATE OF TRIPURA - 30 Sep 19

India - Tripura

he must fell the jury of it and in a non-jury case he must ... of the jury.

STATE OF TRIPURA vs DILIP GUHA - 30 Sep 19

India - Tripura

he must fell the jury of it and in a non-jury case he must ... of the jury.

Amritalal Hazra VS Emperor. BR Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs @APPELLANT - 25 Feb 15

India - Calcutta

C.C.227 to enable the Jury to bring in a verdict of guilty, it is necessary not only that it should be a rational conviction, but ... 31. ... On the other hand, any possible theory that he had come down to Calcutta from Chittagong at the invitation of Sasanka for the purposes

Amrita Lal Hazra VS Emperor - 02 Feb 15

India - Calcutta

31. ... C. 227, to enable the Jury to bring in a verdict of guilty, it, is necessary not only that it should be a rational conviction, but ... On the other hand, any possible theory that he had come down to Calcutta from Chittagong at the invitation of Sasanka for the purposes

Searched Results

Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress VS State of Madhya Pradesh - 06 Apr 11

Gali Muddu Krishnam Naidu, M. L. A. Puttur, Chittoor District VS Government of A. P, rep. by its chief Secretary, Hyderabad - 31 Oct 94

Rajendra Prasad: Kunjukunju Janardhanan: Sheo Shanker Dubey VS State Of U. P. : State Of Kerala: State Of U. P. - 09 Feb 79

Sub Committee On Judicial Accountability: Raj Birbal VS Union Of India: Rabi Ray - 29 Oct 91

RAJEEV SURI VS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY - 05 Jan 21

Bachan Singh VS State of Punjab - 16 Aug 82

JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) VS UNION OF INDIA - 24 Aug 17

Union Carbide Corporation VS Union Of India - 03 Oct 91

Nimeshbhai Bharatbhai Desai VS State of Gujarat - 02 Apr 18

Sushil Ansal VS State Through CBI - 05 Mar 14

TOFAN SINGH VS STATE OF TAMIL NADU - 29 Oct 20

S. P. Gupta: V. M. Tarkunde: J. L. Kalra: Iqbal M. Chagla: Lily Thomas: A. Rajappa: Union Of India: D. N. Pandey: R. Prasad Sinha VS Union Of India: Union Of India: Union Of India: P. Shivshankar: Union Of India: Union Of India: P. Subramanian: Union Of India: K. B. N. Singh - 30 Dec 81

AKHIL BHARTIYA UPBHOKTA CONGRESS vs STAET OF M.P. . - 06 Apr 11

His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadgalvaru VS State of Kerala - 24 Apr 73

BACHAN SINGH ETC. ETC. vs STATE OF PUNJAB ETC. ETC. - 16 Aug 82

DILIP GUHA vs STATE OF TRIPURA - 30 Sep 19

STATE OF TRIPURA vs DILIP GUHA - 30 Sep 19

Amritalal Hazra VS Emperor. BR Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs @APPELLANT - 25 Feb 15

Amrita Lal Hazra VS Emperor - 02 Feb 15