A. M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI, SANJIV KHANNA
RAJEEV SURI – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.M. Khanwilkar, J.
| TABLE OF CONTENTS | ||
| S.NO. | TOPIC | PARAS |
| 1. | Introduction | 1 |
| 2. | Objectives of the Project | 2-10 |
| 3. | Proceedings and Contentions of the Parties | 11-123 |
| Consideration | ||
| 4. | Rule of Law | 124-135 |
| 5. | Democratic Due Process and Judicial Review | 136-158 |
| 6. | Need for Heightened Judicial Review | 159-167 |
| 7. | Constitutionalism | 168-172 |
| 8. | Participatory Democracy in India | 173-198 |
| 9. | Change in Land Use | |
| (a) What is Master Plan and Zonal Plan. (b) Modification of Plans (c) Procedure before decision (d) Procedure during decision making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A (e) Quasi Legislative Function (f) Post change in land use decision | 199 200-202 203-228 229 230-265 266-273 274-275 | |
| 10. | CVC (a) Status of CVC and Procedure Adopted for Grant of “No Objection” (b) Non-application of mind (c) Legitimate Expectation | Clearance 276-287 288-295 296-298 |
| 11. | DUAC Approval (a) Stage for Statutory Approval by DUAC (b) Arbitrariness in Grant of Appr | |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.