AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
Fraudulent sale deeds often involve forged signatures, misrepresentation, or non-payment of consideration, leading courts to cancel such deeds and hold parties criminally liable for cheating and forgery. Cheque bounce cases under Section 138 further reinforce the criminal aspect when dishonored cheques are used as security or payment. The core legal principle is that fraudulent intent or dishonest inducement nullifies property transactions and attracts criminal prosecution, emphasizing the importance of genuine documentation and payment in property dealings.

Search Results for "Fraudulent Sale Deeds Cheque Cheque Bounced"

Dharmendra Lathi (rathi) VS State of Rajasthan

2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 1782 India - Rajasthan

SANDEEP MEHTA

The subsequent agreements and dishonoured cheques indicated that the fraudulent intention developed later. ... If the fraudulent intention developed later, the offence under Section 420 IPC cannot be applied. ... deeds of multiple agricultural plots without paying the full sale consideration. ... As per the complainant, the accused gave a totally fraudulent inducement to the complainant for getting the registered sale deeds executed. ... The fact tha....

H. S.  Bilkis Ayoob VS Hamsa Krishnan

2012 0 Supreme(Mad) 4483 India - Madras

C.S.KARNAN

Negotiable Instruments Act - Cheque Bounce - Sections 138 - The court confirmed the conviction and sentence of the accused under ... Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonor of cheques issued as security for balance sale consideration. ... Fact of the Case: The accused purchased lands from the complainant and issued cheques as security for the balance sale ... The representation made in the sale deeds Exs.A1, A4 and A7, even if th....

Hridaya Ranjan Pd. Verma VS State Of Bihar

2000 3 Supreme 13 India - Supreme Court

D.P.MOHAPATRA, K.T.THOMAS

In the first class of cases the inducing must be fraudulent or dishonest. ... In the second class of acts, the inducing must be intentional but not fraudulent or dishonest. ... breach of contract cannot give raise to criminal prosecution for cheating-It is necessary to show that person making promise had fraudulent ... Finally on 21.10.1995 the appellants through their advocate sent a notice to respondent No. 2 reminding him that the cheques issued by him in favour of the appellants had bounced due to i....

Hridaya Ranjan Pd. Verma VS State of Bihar

2000 3 Supreme 13 India - Crimes

D.P.MOHAPATRA, K.T.THOMAS

In the first class of cases the inducing must be fraudulent or dishonest. ... In the second class of acts, the inducing must be intentional but not fraudulent or dishonest. ... breach of contract cannot give raise to criminal prosecution for cheating—It is necessary to show that person making promise had fraudulent ... Finally on 21.10.1995 the appellants through their advocate sent a notice to respondent No. 2 reminding him that the cheques issued by him in favour of the appellants had bounced due to i....

M.  Anbazhagan VS District Registrar, Registration Department, Puducherry

2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 2836 India - Madras

M. DHANDAPANI

The court held that the sale deed and subsequent registrations were fraudulent and ordered the cancellation of the sale deed and ... The court held that the sale deed and subsequent registrations were fraudulent and ordered their cancellation. ... Fraudulent Sale - Property - Registration Act, 1908, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - The court discussed the intention of the ... b) It is further submitted that the complainant has not moved the Court of Law for disho....

Vashi Pari Villas, a Registered Partnership Firm, duly represented by its Managing Partner, T.  Kamakshi VS Pandian Real Estates, duly consisting of its partners, P. S.  Kumar

2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 3199 India - Madras

V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

Suit for recovery of money on account of dishonored cheques issued by the 6th defendant as a power of attorney holder on behalf ... Whether the cheques issued by the 6th defendant in favour of the plaintiff is towards the compromise agreement for balance payment ... Plaintiff and defendants 2 to 4 entered into an agreement of sale for the purchase of land. ... The very company appears to be a fraudulent company and not at all existing and they have obtained the sale deeds from the sixt....

Krisna Kant Kuswaha S/o Late Moti Mahto VS State of Jharkhand

2021 0 Supreme(Jhk) 998 India - Jharkhand

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

conviction of the petitioners under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for their involvement in a fraudulent ... convicted by the trial court under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for their involvement in a fraudulent ... Ext.13 to Ext.16 series are cheques of different denominations and Ext.16 & Ext.16A are the cheques signed by the accused as Krishna Kant Kushwaha and the said cheques were bounced due to insuf....

NANDA KHEMKA VS STATE NCT OF DELHI

2016 0 Supreme(Del) 76 India - Delhi

MANMOHAN SINGH

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 406, 420, 34 - Cheating - Sale ... of property - Suit of civil nature - Quashing of - Agreement was arrived at through broker - Sale and purchase of property - Amount ... Before the aforesaid cheque could have been presented, broker Arun Tiwari in the last week of April 2010 requested the petitioner No. 1 not to deposit the cheque and assured that the amount of the cheque will be paid by the proposed purchaser. ... Accordingly the....

RAJASEKARAN vs CHANDRA DEVI JHABAK

2024 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 15077 India - High Court of Madras

Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. ASHA

that such fraudulent documents confer no title, supporting the plaintiff's claim of ownership. ... Issues: The key issues included whether the third defendant was a bona fide purchaser and if the sale deeds executed by the ... Fraud - Sale Deed - Null and Void - Court discusses the legal implications of forged signatures in property transactions and affirms ... Taking advantage of the above situation, the fourth defendant and the third defendant colluded together and prepared fraudulent documents. The ....

SHRI RAVINDER KUMAR vs M/S GIGANTIC IMPEX PVT LTD

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 11082 India - High Court of Delhi

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J

(A) Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 55(4)(b) - Cancellation of sale deeds - Plaintiffs sought to cancel sale deeds executed ... deeds does not suffice if the sale consideration is unpaid. ... deeds regarding land parcels, alleging non-payment and fraud by the Defendants. ... However, the Plaintiffs later discovered that the post-dated cheques provided by the two Defendant companies bounced due to insufficient funds. ... The....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top