AI Overview...
-
G C Manjunath & Others vs. Seetaram (2025) 5 SCC 390 - The Supreme Court clarified the principles regarding the necessity of prior sanction for certain actions, emphasizing that such sanctions are essential depending on the nature of the act and the involved authorities. The case involved police conduct and the importance of following legal procedures before initiating prosecution or action against officials Jitendra Kumar Pradhan S/o Jagabandu vs State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand.
-
Manjunath & Others Vs. Seetaram (2025 INSC 439) - The Court discussed the options available when dealing with allegations against police officers, including the possibility of directing investigations by police officers. It reaffirmed the importance of adherence to legal protocols and the role of courts in ensuring justice in cases involving police conduct Nitish Kumar S/o Late Ram Lakhan Singh vs State of Bihar - Patna.
-
Manjunath and Others vs. Seetaram (2025) 5 SCC 390 - The Court examined provisions of Section 197 CrPC and related laws, highlighting the conditions under which prosecution of public officials, such as police officers, can be initiated. It underscored the necessity of prior sanction and the circumstances where courts can issue directions to ensure justice Mahamad Khaji Hussen @ Kwaza @ Kwazahusen, S/O Mahamad Shabbir Hussain vs State Of Karnataka - Karnataka.
-
Jayachandra Reddy & Others in WP No. 37408/2013 (2015) - The Supreme Court addressed issues related to specific performance suits, particularly concerning third-party interests in property transactions. It emphasized the need for courts to carefully consider third-party rights when adjudicating such cases, referencing similar judgments like AIR 2005 SC 2813 Narayana Reddy VS Manjunath - Karnataka.
-
Various judgments (e.g., AIR 1981 SC 136, 2007 SCC 388, 1970 SCC 753) - These cases involve criminal and civil proceedings, including allegations against authorities and irregularities. They highlight the seriousness of financial irregularities, the importance of proper procedural conduct, and the scope of judicial review in cases involving misconduct or administrative actions G. N. Manjunath VS State By Women Police Station - Karnataka.
-
Award and Compensation Cases - The tribunal's decisions on employee compensation, including considerations of future earnings and income assessment, were discussed. The courts pointed out errors such as undervaluation of income and lack of compensation for future earning capacity, emphasizing fair assessment in such awards Rachana VS Manjunath - Karnataka.
-
Procedural Aspects in Civil Cases - The importance of proper application of procedural rules, such as Rule 13 of Order IX for setting aside ex-parte decrees, was highlighted. Proper approach ensures justice and prevents unwarranted judgments against parties who could not appear due to valid reasons B. R. Venkatesh VS Manjunath - Karnataka.
-
Legal Principles on Administrative Powers - The scope of powers conferred under statutes like the Motor Vehicles Act and the powers of transport corporations were analyzed. It was clarified that authorities cannot issue directions beyond their statutory powers, and proper legal procedures must be followed to maintain legality Uttam T. Dhumal & others VS Regional Transport Authority, Pune & others - Bombay.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The collection of cases involving G C Manjunath and related judgments underscores the importance of procedural compliance, especially concerning prior sanctions, investigation procedures, and proper exercise of administrative powers. Courts consistently emphasize adherence to legal protocols to ensure justice, whether in criminal proceedings against officials, civil suits involving property rights, or administrative actions. Proper procedural conduct and respect for statutory limits are vital to uphold rule of law and prevent arbitrary actions.
Search Results for "G C Manjunath Others"
2025 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1823 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Manjunath & Others vs. Seetaram and Sankaran Moitra vs. Sadhna Das. ... Manjunath & Others vs. Seetaram reported in (2025) 5 SCC 390 , para-41 of which reads as under:- “41. In light of the aforesaid judgments, the guiding principle governing the necessity of prior sanction stands well crystallised. ... The petitioner and others tried to stop them but they pushed the petitioner and fled away. They were directed to stop by being told loudly. It appeared to the petitioner and the force accompanying him th....
2025 0 Supreme(Pat) 653 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Manjunath & Others Vs. Seetaram reported as 2025 INSC 439. 12. Arguing further, Mr. ... Manjunath case (supra), which reads as under: “35. Recently, this Court in Gurmeet Kaur vs. ... In support of his submission, learned Advocate General relied upon the legal report of Hon’ble Supreme Court as available through Bijoe Emmanuel and others Vs. State of Kerala and others [ a href="./.. ... The other option open to the court is to direct investigation to be made by a police officer. ... I....
2025 0 Supreme(Kar) 184 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
Manjunath and others vs. Seetaram , [(2025) 5 SCC 390] . 5. ... Manjunath (supra), the Hon'ble Apex Court has held as follows; "38. While dealing with the provisions of Section 197CrPC, read with Section 170 of the Police Act, this Court in D. ... b) To issue such other order or to issue such other direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in peculiar facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity. ... In the case of an act of a policeman or any other publ....
2015 0 Supreme(Kar) 1160 • India - Karnataka
S.SUJATHA
Jayachandra Reddy and others in WP No. 37408/2013, dated 13-4-2015, having considered the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. ... Iyyamperumal and others, reported in AIR 2005 SC 2813, the Apex Court decided the similar issue i.e. whether in a suit for specific performance of contract for sale of a property instituted by a purchaser against the vendor, a stranger or a third party ... The petitioner was compelled to file the suit in OS No. 271/2009 against respondent Nos. 1 and 2 for the relief of specific performance of the contract and other#....
2014 0 Supreme(Kar) 173 • India - Karnataka
S.N.SATYANARAYANA
2014 0 Supreme(Kar) 551 • India - Karnataka
B.S.PATIL
JAGMOHAN AND OTHERS - AIR 1981 SC 136 ... (d) COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE VS. BRINDAVAN BEVERAGES (P) LIMITED AND OTHERS - (2007) 5 SCC 388 ... (e) STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS VS. ... P.S.RAJAGOPAL NAIDU AND OTHERS - 1970(1) SCC 753. ... 10. Sri D.N. ... It cannot be forgotten that allegations against the Board of Directors and others concerned are very serious. The magnitude of the financial irregularity is also very serious. In fact, complaints have been filed and criminal cases are regi....
2017 0 Supreme(Kar) 554 • India - Karnataka
K.S.MUDAGAL
Attendant's charges, diet, conveyance and other ... Award on the following grounds: ... (i) The Tribunal has not awarded any compensation on the head of loss of future earning; ... (ii) The income of the claimant assessed by the Tribunal is on the lower side; ... (iii) The compensation awarded on the other
2012 0 Supreme(Kar) 618 • India - Karnataka
JAWAD RAHIM, V.SURI APPA RAO
In other words, the appellant is trying to contend that he has sufficient cause to show that he could not appear before the trial Court. If that be so, then the appellant had to actually approach the trial Court under Rule 13 of Order IX seeking to set-aside the ex-parte decree.
2002 0 Supreme(Bom) 888 • India - Bombay
A.P.SHAH, RANJANA DESAI
Manjunath Kamath and others)3, A.I.R. 1972 S.C. 2250 and (B. Rajagopala Naidu v. The State Transport Appellate Tribunal Madras and others)4, A.I.R. 1964 S.C. 1573. ... 8. In P. ... Manjunath Kamath's case the question before the Supreme Court was about the power of the Inter State Transport Commission to issue directions under section 63(2)(c) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. ... The State of Maharashtra and others)5, A.I.R. 1974 S.C. 1905. In that case the argument of the appellants was that the area ....
2009 0 Supreme(Kar) 302 • India - Karnataka
SUBHASH B.ADI
Section 18 of the Act deals with general duty of Corporation and Section 19 deals with powers of Corporation amongst other powers ... employees, the Managing Director of the K.S.R.T.C. cannot issue direction or pass order in respect of matters pertaining to the other ... If power conferred under Section 34 of the Act is to be understood, as having power to give any direction de hors to the other provisions ... He relied on another decision of the Full Bench of Bombay High Court reported in AIR 1977 Bombay 193 in the matter of Chandrakant ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
