AI Overview

AI Overview...

#AdulteryLawIndia, #DivorceGrounds, #FamilyLawIndia

Is Adultery Legal in India? Understanding the Current Legal Status


Adultery remains a hotly debated topic in India, often sparking questions like Adultry is Legal or Not (note: commonly misspelled as 'adultry'; correctly 'adultery'). With evolving societal norms and landmark Supreme Court judgments, its legal standing has shifted dramatically. This blog post breaks down whether adultery is a crime, its implications in divorce proceedings, evidence rules, and more. This is general information based on key case laws and statutes—not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.


Adultery's Criminal Status: Decriminalized, Not Legalized


Historically, adultery was a criminal offence under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), punishable by up to 5 years imprisonment. It treated adultery as a crime only if committed by a man with a married woman without her husband's consent. However, in the landmark Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018) case (implied across results), the Supreme Court struck down Section 497 as unconstitutional, violating Articles 14, 15, and 21.



  • Key Ruling: Adultery has already been decriminalized Deepak Soni VS Anamika.

  • Live-in relationships between consenting adults are not offences, with the obvious exception of `adultery’, but post-decriminalization, even this exception holds no criminal penalty S. Khushboo VS Kanniammal.


Today, adultery is not a criminal offence. It cannot lead to arrest or prosecution. Courts emphasize personal liberty: A live-in relationship between two consenting adults of heterogenic sex does not amount to any offence (with the obvious exception of `adultery’), even though it may be perceived as immoral S. Khushboo VS Kanniammal.


However, it's not 'legal' in the sense of endorsement. Society and family laws still view it as a breach of marital fidelity, with civil consequences.


Adultery as a Ground for Divorce: Still Very Relevant


While decriminalized, adultery remains a statutory ground for divorce under personal laws like the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (Section 13(1)(i)), Indian Divorce Act, 1869, and others.



Mental Cruelty Linked to Adultery Allegations


False adultery accusations can backfire as mental cruelty:
- False charges of adultery amount to mental cruelty to the wife Kaushalya VS Fusa Ram - 1988 Supreme(Raj) 833.
- It is not disputed that false charges of adultery amounts to mental cruelty to the wife Kaushalya VS Fusa Ram - 1988 Supreme(Raj) 833.


In Naveen Kohli v. Neelu Kohli Naveen Kohli VS Neelu Kohli - 2006 2 Supreme 627, prolonged separation and infidelity suspicions contributed to irretrievable breakdown, granting divorce. Courts note: There may, however, be cases where the conduct complained of itself is bad enough and per se unlawful or illegal Naveen Kohli VS Neelu Kohli - 2006 2 Supreme 627.


Paternity and Legitimacy: Section 112 Evidence Act Protects Children


Adultery allegations often involve child paternity. Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 creates a conclusive presumption of legitimacy:
- A child born during a valid marriage is deemed the husband's, unless non-access (no opportunity for intercourse) is proven.
- Birth during marriage, conclusive proof of legitimacy Deepak Soni VS Anamika.
- DNA tests are not routine: DNA Paternity Test requires to be conducted only in exceptional cases – Child cannot be used as weapon to get divorce on ground of adultery Deepak Soni VS Anamika.


Courts Prioritize Child Welfare:
- Court has to keep into paramount consideration mental and physical health of child Deepak Soni VS Anamika.
- Even if DNA disproves biological paternity, legitimacy holds: Conclusive presumption of paternity of a child born during subsistence of a valid marriage is that child is that of husband and it cannot be rebutted by a mere DNA test report Aparna Ajinkya Firodia VS Ajinkya Arun Firodia - 2023 3 Supreme 418.


In Master Arjun case Aparna Ajinkya Firodia VS Ajinkya Arun Firodia - 2023 3 Supreme 418, courts refused DNA tests mechanically, protecting the child's right to privacy under Article 21.


Other Contexts: Maintenance, Inheritance, and Reconciliation



Adultery doesn't dissolve Hindu marriages automatically: Till the Hindu marriage is dissolved none of the spouses can contract second marriage Saria Musgal, President, Kalyani VS Union of India - 1995 Supreme(Raj) 299. Bigamy remains punishable under IPC Section 494.


Key Takeaways and Evolving Law


| Aspect | Status |
|--------|--------|
| Criminal Penalty | Decriminalized (No jail/prosecution) Deepak Soni VS Anamika |
| Divorce Ground | Yes, under HMA S.13(1)(i) V. Bhagat VS D. Bhagat (Mrs) - 1993 Supreme(SC) 1093 |
| Mental Cruelty | False claims = cruelty A. Jayachandra VS Aneel Kaur - 2005 1 Supreme 626 |
| Child Paternity | Presumed legitimate (S.112 Evidence Act) Aparna Ajinkya Firodia VS Ajinkya Arun Firodia - 2023 3 Supreme 418 |
| Maintenance | Barred if proven Salamant Maish VS Neena - 2002 Supreme(J&K) 16 |


Irretrievable Breakdown: Courts increasingly grant divorce on this (non-statutory) basis when marriages are dead, as in IAS officers' case Samar Ghosh VS Jaya Ghosh - 2007 3 Supreme 26: It is impossible to preserve or save this marriage.


Adultery reflects shifting norms—from crime to private wrong. Yet, courts urge reconciliation where possible.


Final Advice


Laws vary by religion (Hindu, Muslim, Christian) and facts. Adultery's legality depends on context: no crime, but civil fallout. For personalized guidance, seek a family lawyer. Stay informed—recommendations for irretrievable breakdown as a divorce ground continue Naveen Kohli VS Neelu Kohli - 2006 2 Supreme 627.


Disclaimer: This post summarizes precedents like Samar Ghosh VS Jaya Ghosh - 2007 3 Supreme 26, Deepak Soni VS Anamika, Aparna Ajinkya Firodia VS Ajinkya Arun Firodia - 2023 3 Supreme 418. Legal outcomes depend on specifics; professional advice essential.

Search Results for "Is Adultery Legal in India? Crime or Divorce Ground?"

Rameshwar S/o Kalyan Singh VS State Of Rajasthan - 1951 Supreme(SC) 83

1951 0 Supreme(SC) 83 India - Supreme Court

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, VIVIAN BOSE

the nature of an oath and so did not administer oath but despite that went on to take her evidence. ... nbsp;Held: An omission to administer an oath, even to an adult, goes to the credibility of the witness and not ... In the present case, it is plain that the learned Judge had the proviso in mind because he certified that the witness did not under-stand ... But adultery presupposes consent and so is not on the same footing as rape. ... If she consented there is no offence unless she is a married woman,....

Samar Ghosh VS Jaya Ghosh - 2007 3 Supreme 26

2007 3 Supreme 26 India - Supreme Court

DALVEER BHANDARI, P.P.NAOLEKAR, B.N.AGARWAL

separation—It may be concluded that matrimonial bond is beyond repair—By refusing to severe that tie, law in such cases, does not ... nbsp;The finding of the Division Bench of the High Court that, considering the position and status ... person depending upon his upbringing, level of sensitivity, educational, family and cultural background, financial position, social status ... There may, however, be cases where the conduct complained of itself is bad enough and per se unlawful or illegal#HL_EN....

N. G. Dastane VS S. Dastane - 1975 Supreme(SC) 133

1975 0 Supreme(SC) 133 India - Supreme Court

N.L.UNTWALIA, P.K.GOSWAMI, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD

Deshmukh a relative of the respondent s mother - Letter was written avowedly in order that appellant and his people "should not be ... from the conduct of the appellant after condonation - Condonation is conditional forgiveness but grant of such forgiveness does not ... from finding of the High Court that his allegation that respondent was of unsound mind is baseless - He also protested that he was not ... issues of adultery." ... Condoned cruelty can therefore be revived, say, by desertion or adultery.....

V. Bhagat VS D. Bhagat (Mrs) - 1993 Supreme(SC) 1093

1993 0 Supreme(SC) 1093 India - Supreme Court

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, KULDIP SINGH

written statement per se constitute cruelty which entitled him straightway to a divorce without going into original allegation of adultery ... again from year, onwards - To start with she was employed in a Travel Agency - Somewhere around petitioner began suspecting her of infidelity ... course - Mental cruelty - Cross-examination - Husband sued for divorce on ground that wife is guilty of adulterous course of life ... There may. however, be cases where the conduct complained of itself is bad enough and per Se unlawful o....

A. K. Gopalan VS State Of Madras - 1950 Supreme(SC) 19

1950 0 Supreme(SC) 19 India - Supreme Court

G.KANIA

It is also not disputed that such law must not offend against the fundamental rights. ... Article 21-Meaning of "procedure established by law" -Not the same as "due process of law" in U.S.A. Constitution. ... ... Held: Section 14 of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, is illegal ... Take for example, laws relating to prohibition or take such a matter as adultery which the Indian law regards as a crime punishable ... Such ....

Deepak Soni VS Anamika

India - Current Civil Cases

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

, on strength of outcome of DNA Paternity Test – Adultery has already been decriminalized – For protecting best interest of child ... Paternity Test requires to be conducted only in exceptional cases – Child cannot be used as weapon to get divorce on ground of adultery ... Court has to keep into paramount consideration mental and physical health of child and aspects adversely affecting it – DNA Test is ... While dealing with allegations of adultery and infidelity, a request for a DNA test of the child, ....

Basappa Parasappa Kattimani vs State Of Karnataka - 2025 Supreme(Kar) 494

2025 0 Supreme(Kar) 494 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

R.NATARAJ, RAJESH RAI K

... ... Result: The Criminal Appeal No.100365/2023 is hereby dismissed. ... Sections 302 and 506 - Conviction for murder and criminal intimidation - Accused convicted for killing his wife out of suspicion of infidelity ... The Karnataka State Legal Services Authority is directed to pay Rs.15,000/- to Mr. S.L. ... Hence, interference in the impugned judgment is not called for. ... Lastly, he contended that the recovery of M.O.1-sickle at the instance of accused is #H....

Anagha Hitesh Arya vs The State of Maharashtra

India - Appellate Side,Bombay

Mrs. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J

deceased, challenged rejection of her discharge application in connection with suicide of her husband - The evidence presented did not ... position asserts that all causes leading to suicide cannot be considered abetment unless stringent criteria are met - Case law referenced ... deceased to suicide - (Paras 3, 15, 21, 22) ... ... (B) Legal ... It is not an adultery but these are instances of infidelity and unfaithfulness, which is#HL_END....

MANUJ SHARMA VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - 2019 Supreme(All) 462

2019 0 Supreme(All) 462 India - Allahabad

PRITINKER DIWAKER, RAJ BEER SINGH

custody of their mother, respondent no.7, and are not in a position to think about their welfare – Claiming for legal custody – ... According to petitioner, respondent nos.5 and 6 are in illegal custody of their mother, respondent no.7, and are not in a position ... marriage was solemnized and out of the wedlock, the couple has two issues, According to petitioner, respondent nos.5 and 6 are in illegal ... Learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that respondent no.7 is living in #HL....

Aparna Ajinkya Firodia VS Ajinkya Arun Firodia - 2023 3 Supreme 418

2023 3 Supreme 418 India - Supreme Court

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, B. V. NAGARATHNA

dissolution of marriage on the ground of adultery or infidelity – When a child is born during subsistence of lawful wedlock, it ... to be legitimate, even if wife is shown to have been, at the same time, guilty of infidelity – Fact that a woman is living in adultery ... , Court is to be mindful of consequences thereof on children born out of adultery, including inheritance-related consequences, social ... This #HL_....

Stanely D. Crooze VS Kamini D. Crooze - 1998 Supreme(Raj) 555

1998 0 Supreme(Raj) 555 India - Rajasthan

P.P.NAOLEKAR, P.C.JAIN, V.S.KOKJE

He, therefore, sought a divorce on the ground of adultry committed by the wife. In reply to the petition, the wife respondent No. 1 denied having committed adultry but put forward a claim for divorce on her own grounds. She alleged that the petitioner was not behaving properly with her. ... The petitioner relied on all the correspondence and photographs for proving the adultry. There was no cross-examination on this point also on behalf of respondents. Petitioners mother also relied on the photographs and correspondence ....

Salamant Maish VS Neena - 2002 Supreme(J&K) 16

2002 0 Supreme(J&K) 16 India - Jammu and Kashmir

A.M.MIR

According to the Magistrate, it was after the passing of this order that court could advert to the fact as to whether or not the wife because of living in adultry was entitled to maintenance. ... Once the statute lays a perfect bar on the entitlement of wife, question of passing any order in her favour in terms of section (1) will not arise. ... While dealing with this point, Madras High Court held that a wife who refuses to live with her husband on account of his re-marriage is not prevented under sub-section (4) for cl....

Sushil Kumar Beri VS Jyoti Rani Beri - 1997 Supreme(Gau) 255

1997 0 Supreme(Gau) 255 India - Gauhati

N.SURJAMANI SINGH, V.DUTTA GYANI

allegations of adultry made by him. ... We would like to make it clear that since no relief has been sought by the appellant on the ground of adultry, we would not go into the question. ... This case with slight difference aptly reminds one of a well known scene from Shakespear's Writer Tale, the arrangement of Hermione who was charged with adultry, a difference life is not a dream over the fire side, it is governed by Rules of realism and not of romance. ... It is not#HL_END....

Kaushalya VS Fusa Ram - 1988 Supreme(Raj) 833

1988 0 Supreme(Raj) 833 India - Rajasthan

N.C.KOCHHAR

It is not disputed that false charges of adultry amounts to mental cruelty to the wife. The learned trial court, therefore, wrongly decided issue No. 2 in favour of the respondents. ... This statement was not challenged in the cross-examination conducted on behalf of the respondent. The respondent did not even say a word denying this fact in his statement on oath, made by him appearing as N.W. 1. ... She had pleaded that she had not condoned the cruelty and that there was no delay in presenting the pet....

Kumari Pushpa VS Smt Santosh - 1982 Supreme(Raj) 456

1982 0 Supreme(Raj) 456 India - Rajasthan

M.C.JAIN

The allegation against the petitioner is that the non-petitioner No. 2 Ram Niwas is living in adultry with the petitioner. The petitioner's stand is that it is not necessary for her to appear in court for reconciliation. ... It may on stated the though the court has directed the petitioner to appear, but it is the sweet-will to appear or not to appear. If the petitioner chooses not to appear before the court, the petitioner cannot be compelled to appear.

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top