When facing criminal charges, one of the most critical concerns is bail eligibility. A common scenario arises when a case initially registered for a bailable offence later incorporates a non-bailable section. This creates confusion about whether previously granted bail can be cancelled, if anticipatory bail is available, and what rights the accused retains. This blog post breaks down the legal principles based on landmark judgments, helping you navigate registered for non bailable section in bailable offence situations.
Disclaimer: This is general information based on judicial precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case, as outcomes depend on individual facts.
Under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973:
The First Schedule of CrPC classifies offences. However, complications arise when police alter charges post-FIR, adding non-bailable sections like IPC 307 (attempt to murder) to bailable ones like IPC 323 (voluntarily causing hurt).Chiman Singh VS State of Rajasthan - 1997 Supreme(Raj) 1178
No, not automatically. Supreme Court and High Court precedents emphasize protection of liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.
In a case where bail was granted under Section 436 CrPC for bailable offences (IPC 147, 323, 448, 379), later altered to include non-bailable IPC 307:
Once bail is granted in a bailable offence, it cannot be cancelled even after the conversion of the said case into a non-bailable one. Kallu Khan VS State of Rajasthan - 1998 Supreme(Raj) 955
The court relied on Aslam Babalal Desai v. State of Maharashtra, holding that mere charge sheet revealing non-bailable offences isn't enough for cancellation—special reasons are required. Kallu Khan VS State of Rajasthan - 1998 Supreme(Raj) 955
Another ruling clarified:
It is axiomatic that the provision under Section 437(5) CrPC, which is in respect of non-bailable offence, cannot be invoked in respect of a bailable offence which is under Section 436 CrPC. Pallapati Malyadri, (A1), S/o China Malakondaiah VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2022 Supreme(AP) 1447
Magistrate's Limitation: A Magistrate granting bail under Section 436 cannot cancel it under Section 437(5) merely because police altered sections. Only High Court or Sessions Court (Section 439(2) CrPC) can direct re-arrest with cogent reasons. Chiman Singh VS State of Rajasthan - 1997 Supreme(Raj) 1178
Section 438 CrPC allows anticipatory bail if arrest is apprehended in non-bailable offences. But if the core FIR is bailable:
Example: In a case with IPC 448 (house trespass, bailable) + 147/148 (rioting, non-bailable), court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner whose co-accused was bailed, on Rs.25,000 bond. BACHHU RAM Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR
The court has the discretion to grant anticipatory bail to a person who is apprehending arrest in a case registered for a non-bailable offence. BACHHU RAM Vs THE STATE OF BIHAR
In NDPS small quantity cases (max 1-year sentence), courts classify as bailable under BNSS 2023, entitling automatic bail. Raju Kumar VS State of Bihar - 2025 Supreme(Pat) 168
Courts caution against routine arrests:
No arrest should be made only because the offence is non-bailable and cognizable... Provisions of section 41 are to be scrupulously observed. ARNESH KUMAR VS STATE OF BIHAR - 2014 5 Supreme 324
Non-bailable warrants (NBW) are a last resort:
- Issue summons or bailable warrants first.
- NBW only if accused evades despite service. Lala @ Daneshwar, S/o Chhotelal VS State of Chhattisgarh, through Station House Officer, Police Station Takhatpur - 2021 Supreme(Chh) 105
In bailable cases, investigating officer lacks jurisdiction to deny bail under Section 436. Chiman Singh VS State of Rajasthan - 1997 Supreme(Raj) 1178
Petitioners granted Section 436 bail for IPC 324. Police added IPC 307; Magistrate cancelled bail. High Court set it aside:
The Magistrate is not empowered to cancel bail granted under Section 436 CrPC on the ground of alteration of the Section of law by the police. Pallapati Malyadri, (A1), S/o China Malakondaiah VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2022 Supreme(AP) 1447
Article 21 guarantees speedy trial. Prolonged detention in mixed cases violates rights, especially post-charge sheet. Courts grant bail if trial delay is evident. Sanjay Chandra VS CBI - 2011 8 Supreme 270
When the undertrial prisoners are detained in jail custody to an indefinite period, Article 21 of the Constitution is violated. Sanjay Chandra VS CBI - 2011 8 Supreme 270
In summary, registering a non-bailable section in bailable offence doesn't strip your fundamental rights. Judicial precedents protect against misuse, ensuring bail remains accessible where warranted. Stay informed, act promptly, and seek professional counsel.
This post references judgments like ARNESH KUMAR VS STATE OF BIHAR - 2014 5 Supreme 324, Kallu Khan VS State of Rajasthan - 1998 Supreme(Raj) 955, Pallapati Malyadri, (A1), S/o China Malakondaiah VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2022 Supreme(AP) 1447, Sanjay Chandra VS CBI - 2011 8 Supreme 270, Raju Kumar VS State of Bihar - 2025 Supreme(Pat) 168, Lala @ Daneshwar, S/o Chhotelal VS State of Chhattisgarh, through Station House Officer, Police Station Takhatpur - 2021 Supreme(Chh) 105, Chiman Singh VS State of Rajasthan - 1997 Supreme(Raj) 1178, and High Court orders. For full texts, refer to legal databases.
Code of Criminal Procedure ,1973- Section 439 - Appellants facing trial in respect of offences under Sections 420-B, 468, 471 and ... the purpose of cheating using as genuine a forged document-The punishment of offence is punishment for a term which may extend to ... 439 - Appellants facing trial in respect of offences under Sections 420-B, 468, 471 and 109 of Indian Penal Code and Section 13( ... of bail in non-#H....
is non-bailable and cognizable and therefore, lawful for the police officers to do so – Provisions of section or Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, but also to such cases where offence ... arrogance and corruption – To arrest first and then proceed to investigate – Despicable – No arrest should be made only because the offence ... The fact that Section 498-A is a cognizable and non-bailable offence#....
a certain period, only then the non-bailable warrants should be issued.When non-bailable warrants should be issued Non-bailable ... The Sabha was registered in the year 1949 under the Societies Registration Act. ... The appellants had to file an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. because the Special Judicial Magistrate, Rishikesh issued a non-bailable
the offence (irrespective of compensation) must be left to the criminal courts in which the offender is prosecuted, which the State ... ... (3) A person who has been arrested or detained and is being held ... informed, as soon as practicable, that he has been arrested and is being detained at the particular place, unless the attesting ... for sureties in the event of his arrest for a non-bailable offence. ... -The Executive Chairman, Legal Aid Servi....
Procedure, 1973, See 309 & 482 - Speady trial-right to speedy trial is embedded in the statutory law of this country - sub-sections ... in this country have been cognizent of undue delay-it is neither advisable norfeasible to draw or prescribe an outer time limit for ... Officer against whom an offence under Section 5(2) read with Section 5(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act was registered in ... (Section 7(2) provides that "every offence spec....
Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections ... the Case: The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 448, 147 ... ANTICIPATORY BAIL - SECTION 438 CRPC - OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS 448, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 354B, 379, 5....
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to anticipatory bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section ... petitioner was apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition ... BAIL - SECTION 30(A) OF THE BIHAR PROHIBITION AND EXCISE ACT - ANTICIPATORY BAIL - CONDITIONSFact of the Case: The ....
Fact of the Case: THE PETITIONER WAS APPREHENDING HIS ARREST IN A CASE REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER ... Ratio Decidendi: THE COURT RELIED ON SECTION 438(2) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973, WHICH PROVIDES FOR THE GRANT ... ANTICIPATORY BAIL - BIHAR PROHIBITION & EXCISE ACT, 1978 - SECTION 30(A) - ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED TO THE PETITIONER WHO WAS ... The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case #HL_S....
The bail application is granted and subsequently closed as the petitioners’ apprehension of being arrested for a non-bailable offence ... State of Kerala, the offences under Sections 20 and 23 of the Sand Act are bailable, thus concluding that the non-bailable charge ... The petitioners are accused in Crime No.1390 of 2025 of Tirur Police Station, Malappuram, registered #HL_START....
BAIL - CANCELLATION - SECTION 439(2) CR.P.C. - ONCE BAIL IS GRANTED IN A BAILABLE OFFENCE, IT CANNOT BE CANCELLED EVEN AFTER THE ... the charge sheet reveals the commission of a non-bailable offence. ... Issues: Whether bail granted in a bailable offence can be cancelled after the conversion of the case into a non-bailable offence#HL_....
legislature intending not to make every offence non-bailable. ... Bailable offence is defined under Section 2(c) of the BNSS, 2023 which is as under: – “2(c) “bailable offence” means an offence which shown as bailable in the First Schedule, or which is made bailable by any other law for the time being in force; and “non-bailable offence” means ....
i.e. 11-4-2014 and on 11-4-2014, it was rejected holding that the offences which he has been charged are bailable, yet prima facie, offence under Section 67A of the IT Act is also made out which is non-bailable offence, therefore, his application was rejected and revision preferred against that order ... It appears that though on that day i.e. 11-4-2014, there was no charge against the petitioner for non-bailable offence, yet, he re....
First point for consideration was whether the offence under section 63 of the Copyright Act and also subsequently applied section 103 of the Trade Marks Act were bailable or non bailable. Shri. ... Therefore, the first question which needs to be addressed and decided is to whether the offence punishable under section 63 of the Copyright Act and section 103 of Trade Marks Act are bailable or non #H....
i.e. 11-4-2014 and on 11-4-2014, it was rejected holding that the offences which he has been charged are bailable, yet prima facie, offence under Section 67A of the IT Act is also made out which is non-bailable offence, therefore, his application was rejected and revision preferred against that order ... It appears that though on that day i.e. 11-4-2014, there was no charge against the petitioner for non-bailable offence, yet, he re....
First point for consideration was whether the offence under section 63 of the Copyright Act and also subsequently applied section 103 of the Trade Marks Act were bailable or non bailable. Shri. ... Therefore, the first question which needs to be addressed and decided is to whether the offence punishable under section 63 of the Copyright Act and section 103 of Trade Marks Act are bailable or non #H....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.