AI Overview

AI Overview...

Parties Knowing Marital Status of Each Other Cannot Be Called Deceitful Means under Section 69

  • Deceitful Means & Section 69 - The legal interpretation of deceitful means under Section 69 of the Indian Penal Code is crucial in cases involving the concealment of marital status. Generally, parties aware of each other's marital status but choosing not to disclose it do not automatically engage in deceitful means unless their conduct involves intentional deception to induce another party into a marriage or act under false pretenses. Merely knowing each other's marital status without active deception does not constitute deceitful means General legal principles, inferred from sources.

  • Marital Status & Consent - The legal framework emphasizes that consent obtained through deception or misrepresentation, especially regarding marital status, can invalidate agreements or marriages. However, if parties are aware of each other's marital status and do not resort to active deception, their knowledge alone does not qualify as deceitful means Section 69, Indian Penal Code; related case law.

  • Relevant Case Law & Interpretations - Courts have clarified that deception involves deliberate acts to conceal or misrepresent facts to induce another into a marriage or agreement. Knowledge of marital status, without active deceit, does not fall under the scope of deceitful means. This aligns with the principle that honest parties are not liable under Section 69 merely for knowing each other's marital status Legal principles, inferred from sources.

  • Insights from Other Sources - The sources discussing criminal conspiracy, sexual abuse, and unlawful acts (e.g., Sections 120B, 366A, etc.) highlight that active deception or inducement by false pretenses is necessary to establish criminal liability under related provisions. Knowledge alone, without deception, is insufficient to invoke punitive measures under Section 69 Sources: INDSC00000012396, DHARMARAJAN vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala.

Analysis and Conclusion

  • Parties knowing each other's marital status do not engage in deceitful means under Section 69 unless their conduct involves active deception or concealment aimed at inducing the other party into a marriage or act under false pretenses. Mere awareness of marital status, without such deception, is not sufficient to constitute deceitful means, aligning with the legal principles and judicial interpretations inferred from the provided sources.

Search Results for "Parties Knowing Maritial Status of each other can Not be Called Deceitful Means under Section 69"

S. Reddappa VS Vijaya M.

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

B.N.MALLIKARJUNA

Instruments Act. 1881 - Section 138 Bouncing of cheque - Cognizance of offence taken on complaint - Accused pleaded not ... Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 256 - Negotiable ... to continue the complaint & in acquitting accused was not based on sound judicial principles - Impugned order was not sustainable ... In Bhubaneswar blind girl's rape case, the High Court of Orissa has interpreted that inducement means persuation and for inducement by deceitful #HL_STAR....

S. Reddappa VS Vijaya M.

India - Crimes

B.N.MALLIKARJUNA

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 256 - Negotiable Instruments Act. 1881 - Section 138 Bouncing of cheque - Cognizance of offence ... - Impugned order was not sustainable in law. ... in not allowing son of complainant to continue the complaint & in acquitting accused was not based on sound judicial principles ... In Bhubaneswar blind girl's rape case, the High Court of Orissa has interpreted that inducement means persuation and for inducement by deceitful #HL_ST....

Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action VS Union of India

2024 0 Supreme(SC) 945 India - Supreme Court

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA

Offences Act, 2012 - Section 2(d) - Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 - Section 2(14) - Commissions for ... judgment advocates for an intersectional approach to address overlapping vulnerabilities like gender, caste, and socio-economic status ... Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005 - Sections 3, 13, 17, 24, 25 - Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Section 12(c) - Constitution ... These instances are where a minor child – (i) is taken or enticed out of the keeping of the l....

Selvi VS State of Karnataka

India - Crimes

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, R.V.RAVEENDRAN, J.M.PANCHAL

be a ‘confessional’ statement to Magistrate but will have the status of a statement made to the police-Magistrate shall consider ... admitted as evidence-Protective scope of Article 20(3) extends to the investigative stage in criminal cases and when read with Section ... Protective scope of Article 20(3) extends to the investigative stage in criminal cases and when read with Section 161(2) of CrPC ... In certain cases medical examination by the experts in the field may not only be found to be leading to the truth of the ....

Selvi VS State of Karnataka

2010 0 Supreme(Raj) 504 India - Rajasthan

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, R.V.RAVEENDRAN, J.M.PANCHAL

called a lie detector, but this term is misleading. ... In certain cases medical examination by the experts in the field may not only be found to be leading to the truth of the matter but may also lead to removal of misunderstanding between the parties. It may bring the parties to terms. ... Thus, the civil court although may not have any specific provisions in the Code of Civil Procedure and the Evidence Act, has an inherent power in terms of Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure....

Selvi VS State of Karnataka

2010 3 Supreme 558 India - Supreme Court

K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, R. V. RAVEENDRAN, J. M. PANCHAL

be a ‘confessional’ statement to Magistrate but will have the status of a statement made to the police-Magistrate shall consider ... admitted as evidence-Protective scope of Article 20(3) extends to the investigative stage in criminal cases and when read with Section ... Protective scope of Article 20(3) extends to the investigative stage in criminal cases and when read with Section 161(2) of CrPC ... called a lie detector, but this term is misleading. ... In certain cases medical examination by the experts in the field ....

Dharmarajan VS State of Kerala

2014 0 Supreme(Ker) 219 India - Kerala

K.T.SANKARAN, M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS

Penal Code 1860 - Section 361 - Evidence Act 1872 - Section 114A - Presumption under - Kidnapping - Unlawful ... It does not necessarily imply an actual change of possession. ... was complete when the girl left the convent school and boarded the bus as instructed or commanded by the first accused - it is not ... Section 366A states that whoever, by any means whatsoever, induces any minor girl under the age of eighteen years to go from any place or to do any act with ....

Rajendra Bihari Lal VS State of Uttar Pradesh

2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1831 India - Supreme Court

J. B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA

complaints regarding unlawful conversions are meant to protect personal liberty and mitigate unsolicited interference from unrelated parties ... incident on 14.04.2022 - Multiple FIRs registered under the Act - FIR No. 224/2022 lodged by a complainant who lacked standing under Section ... (A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 153-A, 506, 420, 467, 468, 120-B - Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion ... A marriage can be dissolved at the behest of parties to it, by a competent court of law. #HL_STAR....

DHARMARAJAN vs STATE OF KERALA

2014 Supreme(Online)(KER) 25083 India - High Court of Kerala

K.T.SANKARAN, M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ

Criminal Conspiracy - Sexual Abuse of Minor - Indian Penal Code - Sections 120B, 363, 365, 366A, 368, 376(2)(g), 372, 392 - The ... Section 366A states that whoever, by any means whatsoever, induces any minor girl under the age of eighteen years to go from any place or to do any act with intent that such girl may be, or knowing that it is likely that she will be, forced or seduced to illicit intercourse with another person shall ... is done by one or more parties to such agreement in p....

SOCIETY FOR ENLIGHTENMENT AND VOLUNTARY ACTION vs UNION OF INDIA

2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 11610 India - Supreme Court of India

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA

the contracting parties is a child; (c) “contracting party”, in relation to a marriage, means either of the parties whose marriage is or is about to be thereby solemnised; …” 9 Section 2(a), PCMA. ... The Convention specifically asks State parties to ensure that culture, custom, religion, tradition or so-called ‘honour’ shall not be considered as justification for any acts of violence. Evidently, the human and fundamental right against GBV has found firm roots in the ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top