Notably, in the case of Reena Chadha (G. Shrilakshmi VS Anirudh Ramkumar - Madras, G.SHRILAKSHMI vs ANIRUDH RAMKUMAR - Madras), the name appears in the context of family law, with proceedings concerning marriage and divorce, and recognition of video conferencing appearances.
Legal Proceedings and Judgments
In family law cases involving Mrs. G. Shrilakshmi and Mr. Anirudh Ramkumar, courts recognized remote appearances and powers of attorney, indicating ongoing legal proceedings involving individuals with the Chadha surname (G. Shrilakshmi VS Anirudh Ramkumar - Madras, G.SHRILAKSHMI vs ANIRUDH RAMKUMAR - Madras).
Insights and Conclusions
References:
- Ranjan Kumar Chadha VS State of Himachal Pradesh - Supreme Court, VIVEK PATEL S/O DEVANAND PATEL V/s STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat, Padia Exports Pvt. Ltd. VS Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Its Authorised Signatory - Consumer, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU vs RANJAN KUMAR CHADHA - Supreme Court, G. Shrilakshmi VS Anirudh Ramkumar - Madras, G.SHRILAKSHMI vs ANIRUDH RAMKUMAR - Madras, M/S. PADIA EXPORTS PVT. LTD., vs M/S. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., - Consumer National
State of Tamilnadu - 2020 (0) AIJEL SC 66640 (iii) Ranjankumar Chadha v.
The person standing at the bus stand disclosed his identity as Ranjan Kumar Chadha son of Shri Ved Parkash Chadha resident of New Delhi. ... Before witnesses I asked name of that person whereupon that person told his name as Ranjan Kumar Chadha S/o Ved Prakash Chadha, Sarva Priya Vihar, New Delhi. ... Accused Ranjan Chadha present in the court was standing in the verandah of Bus Stand and he had a black blue colour bag on his shoulder. ... Accused told his name as Ranjan Kumar Chadha. ....
Parvesh Chander Chadha, Civil Appeal No. 6739 of 2010, decided on 7.8.2010, had taken the same view in the case of ‘theft of a vehicle’. The same analogy will be applicable to this case, as well. 27. ... Rajankumar & Bros (IMPEX), SLP (Civil) No. 24705 of 2013, decided on 13.8.2013 and two other authorities of the Supreme Court. However, the Counsel for the OP was permitted to submit the arguments and advanced the arguments on legal point only.
in CRLA No. 269/1997 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi) NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU NEW DELHI Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S RANJAN KUMAR CHADHA
The Delhi High Court in the case of Reena Chadha and another vs. Government of NCT of Delhi, (2021) SCC Online 4336 in W.P. ... Anjankumar in C.R.P. No. 1291 of 2023, this Court following the judgment passed in C.R.P. ... Anjankumar, passes the following order: (i) The marriage solemnised between Mrs. G. Shrilakshmi D/o Mr. S. Govindarajan and Mr. Anirudh Ramkumar S/o Mr. S. Ramkumar on 23.06.2016 at Sri Kuchalambal Kalyana Mahal, Chetpet, Chennai, registered as S.
The Delhi High Court in the case of Reena Chadha and another vs. Government of NCT of Delhi reported in (2021) SCC OnLine 4336 in W.P. ... T.Anjankumar in C.R.P.No.1291 of 2023, this Court following the judgment passed in C.R.P.Nos.4299 and 4301 of 2022, recognising and recording the appearance of petitioner/wife through video conferencing from USA and recognising Power of Attorney for the petitioner, had granted the relief of dissolving ... T.Anjankumar, passes the following order: (i) The marriage solemnised between Mrs.G.Shrilakshmi, D....
The Delhi High Court in the case of Reena Chadha and another vs. Government of NCT of Delhi reported in (2021) SCC OnLine 4336 in W.P. ... T.Anjankumar, passes the following order: (i) The marriage solemnised between Mrs.G.Shrilakshmi, D/o.Mr.S.Govindarajan and Mr.Anirudh Ramkumar, S/o.Mr.S.Ramkumar on 23.06.2016 ... T.Anjankumar in C.R.P.No.1291 of 2023, this Court following the judgment passed in C.R.P.Nos.4299 and 4301 of 2022, recognising and recording the appearance of petitioner/wife through video conferencing from USA and recognisi....
(GAGANDEEP SINGH CHADHA) (RANJANA SHAILEY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH) Digitally signed by Harshita Uppal
be satisfactorily refuted by Shri Rishi Chaddha
Parvesh Chander Chadha Civil Appeal No.6739 of 2010, decided on 07.08.2010, had taken the same view in the case of heft of a vehicle The same analogy will be applicable to this case, as well. 27. ... Rajankumar & Bros (IMPEX), SLP (Civil) No.24705 of 2013, decided on 13.08.2013 and two other authorities of the Supreme Court. However, the counsel for the OP was permitted to submit the arguments and advanced the arguments on legal point only. 11.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.