In today's digital world, finding safe websites to install apps is crucial. With millions downloading apps daily, risks like privacy breaches, malware, and legal troubles from rogue sources loom large. The Supreme Court of India's landmark ruling on privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21 highlights these dangers, especially with digital footprints left by online activities. JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) VS UNION OF INDIA - 2017 Supreme(SC) 772
This post draws from key judgments to guide you on legally safe app downloads, helping you protect your right to privacy while avoiding court-ordered blocks on infringing sites.
India's Constitution protects personal liberty under Article 21, now encompassing privacy as a fundamental right. In the seminal Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India case, a nine-judge bench unanimously held that privacy overlaps with liberty and dignity. JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) VS UNION OF INDIA - 2017 Supreme(SC) 772
The judgment warns of technology's impact: Popular websites install cookie files by the user’s browser. It cites cases like downloading child pornography via online software, creating perpetual digital footprints on social networks. JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) VS UNION OF INDIA - 2017 Supreme(SC) 772 Children, in particular, leave traces on a 24/7 basis as they learn their ‘ABCs’. JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) VS UNION OF INDIA - 2017 Supreme(SC) 772
Downloading apps from unsafe sites amplifies these risks. Informational privacy—controlling personal data—is at stake, as apps aggregate browsing history to profile users. The court noted: Lives are open to electronic scrutiny – Privacy concerns are seriously an issue in the age of information. JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) VS UNION OF INDIA - 2017 Supreme(SC) 772
Courts emphasize that right to privacy covers intimate decisions, extending to online choices like app installs.
Many free app sites host rogue apps—illegal platforms for pirated content, betting, or streaming. Courts routinely issue injunctions against them for copyright infringement under the Copyright Act, 1957.
In a case involving IPL streaming, plaintiffs secured an ex parte ad-interim injunction against rogue apps/websites. The court found: Defendants operating illegal apps/websites for unauthorized content access. Balance of convenience favored plaintiffs to prevent irreparable harm. Star India Pvt. Ltd. vs Ashar Nisar
Another ruling granted a permanent injunction for disseminating copyrighted works via rogue apps: Unauthorized dissemination of copyrighted works constitutes infringement. Defendants failed to contest, admitting claims. STAR INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR. Vs ASHAR NISAR & ORS. - 2025 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 384
ISPs are directed to block these: Defendant Nos.10 to 18 (ISPs) are directed to block access. ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LIMITED Vs. ALL ROUNDER TV AND ORS - 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 1750 Users risk fines or device seizures.
Indian courts proactively protect users by targeting unsafe sources:
In trademark disputes, even EV charging apps faced scrutiny for deceptive marks, underscoring priority of established players. Bolt Technology Ou VS Ujoy Technology Private Limited - 2023 Supreme(Del) 1060
These actions safeguard users from legal risks like abetting infringement or privacy violations.
To stay on the right side of the law, prioritize official and verified sources:
Pro Tip: Use antivirus with legal scan features; OEMs aren't forced to pre-install risky apps. Google LLC & Anr. VS Competition Commission of india & Ors. - 2023 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 185
The privacy judgment outlines nine privacy principles for legislation, urging data consent, transparency, and non-discrimination. JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) VS UNION OF INDIA - 2017 Supreme(SC) 772 For apps:
- State intervention must be proportional.
- Big data challenges: Aggregation reveals profiles without consent. JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) VS UNION OF INDIA - 2017 Supreme(SC) 772
Users have rights against arbitrary searches or data shares, even in public apps.
Disclaimer: This post provides general information based on public judgments and is not legal advice. Legal situations vary; consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance. Laws may change, so verify current status.
By choosing safe sources, you uphold your fundamental right to privacy while enjoying apps responsibly.
(h) Right to privacy – Concept of privacy overlaps with liberty – If found to be protected ... Popular websites install cookie files by the user’s browser. ... In this case, the appellant used an online software to download child pornography onto a computer and shared it publicly. ... Children around the world create perpetual digital footprints on social network websites on a 24/7 basis as they learn their ‘ABCs
The overwhelming demand for a safe, reliable, and affordable EV charging infrastructure combined operating such docks, using the ―BOLT‖ mark, in Tallinn and Estonia, with the intent to install ... All that it has done, towards that end, is to install some EV charging stations in a handful of locations, for
On the other hand, the noise data provided by the Applicant is generated from random software apps downloaded ... Pursuant to CAR, Section 10 - AEPS ‘A’ Part I Issue I dated 18.12.2014, issued by DGCA, all major airports are required to install ... Series ‘A’ (hereinafter referred to as AEPS ‘A’), Part I, Issue I, dated 18.12.2014, requiring all busy airports to install
171 Popular websites install cookie files by the user’s browser. ... In this case, the appellant used an online software to download child pornography onto a computer and shared it publicly. ... Children around the world create perpetual digital footprints on social network websites on a 24/7 basis as they learn their
The overwhelming demand for a safe, reliable, and affordable EV charging infrastructure combined with collaboration with other EV ... All that it has done, towards that end, is to install some EV charging stations in a handful of locations, for charging its own ... are concerned, the plaintiff claims to be operating such docks, using the ―BOLT‖ mark, in Tallinn and Estonia, with the intent to install
) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The Plaintiff developed 'My Show & Tell' allowing interactive presentations, filing patent applications ... For the said purpose, parties are permitted to install their respective products/applications on the computer of the Court or on ... The patents in dispute claim inventions that are at best implemented as software/computer programs/algorithms/rules or set of instructions ... programs and tool kits.
Biometric Attendance and CCTV Surveillance All CLEs are required to install biometric attendance systems to ensure accurate ... who are willing to provide internships to students, shall be published by the BCI and the State Bar Councils on their respective websites ... Pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.
of e-procurement portal and related services for providing a safe, secure and transparent e-procurement system, which complies with ... It was explained that it is the standard protocol in respect of certain secure sites to log out users following invalid or erroneous ... All pending applications are also disposed of.
(h) Right to privacy – Concept of privacy overlaps with liberty – If found to be protected ... Popular websites install cookie files by the user’s browser. ... In this case, the appellant used an online software to download child pornography onto a computer and shared it publicly. ... Children around the world create perpetual digital footprints on social network websites on a 24/7 basis as they learn their ‘ABCs
The overwhelming demand for a safe, reliable, and affordable EV charging infrastructure combined with collaboration with other EV ... All that it has done, towards that end, is to install some EV charging stations in a handful of locations, for charging its own ... are concerned, the plaintiff claims to be operating such docks, using the 'BOLT' mark, in Tallinn and Estonia, with the intent to install
These Defendants are using deceptively similar/identical marks to those of the Plaintiff‟s marks for their apps and causing confusion in the market. 10. ... Defendant Nos. 51 to 71 are Internet Service Providers [„ISPs‟] which provide access to users of these websites through the medium of the internet. 14. ... The Plaintiff introduced apps under the said marks in February 2017, and currently offers more than 100 games in 6 formats to users in more than 12 regional languages. 5. ... She states that after the passing of the order dated 08.....
Accordingly, defendants No. 1 to 3 (and any such other UIs/websites which appears to be associated with any of the defendant apps and websites based on its name, branding or the identity of its operator, or discovered to provide additional means of accessing, the defendant apps and websites, and other ... The defendants No. 4 to 8 shall ensure compliance with this order by blocking defendants no. 1 to 3 websites, their URLs and the respective UIs as filed along with the suit (Pg 1 - Vo....
Hundreds of Android-based mobile Apps including most of the Rogue Apps are available for download on these Rogue Websites. ... It is averred in the plaint and argued by the learned counsel that Defendants No. 7 to 12 (hereinafter referred to as `Rogue Websites') are third-party websites which serve as a repository of "APK files, that provide access to users of Android based mobile Apps such as the Rogue Apps. ... Thus, according to the learned counsel, Plaintiffs have....
(iii) As noted above, there has been silence and inaction by infringing apps/websites after the legal notices were sent. (iv) The infringing websites along with the infringing apps clearly make This is a digitally signed order. ... or apps, including those listed as under: b) Defendant Nos.5 to 9 are directed to de-active/lock the abovementioned domains/sub-domains of the infringing websites and apps. ... d) Defendant Nos.10 to 18 (ISPs) are directed to block acce....
of the Plaintiffs including future works of the Plaintiffs, in which ownership of copyright is undisputed, through their websites identified in the suit or any mirror/redirect websites or alphanumeric variations thereof including those websites which are associated with the Defendants' websites either ... , by filing an application for impleadment under Order I Rule 10 CPC in the event such websites merely provide new means of accessing the same primary infringing websites that have be....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.