AI Overview

AI Overview...

#Section143A, #NIACT, #ChequeBounce

Understanding Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Interim Compensation in Cheque Bounce Cases


Cheque bounce cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) are among the most common criminal complaints in India. With the 2018 amendment introducing Section 143A, courts gained power to order interim compensation from the accused to the complainant. But what does this mean in practice? Is it mandatory? Does it apply retrospectively? This post breaks down Section 143A NI Act, drawing from key judicial interpretations to help you navigate these proceedings.


Disclaimer: This article provides general information based on judicial precedents and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for case-specific guidance, as outcomes depend on individual facts.


What is Section 143A of the NI Act?


Introduced via the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2018, effective from September 1, 2018, Section 143A empowers the trial court to direct the drawer (accused) of a dishonoured cheque to pay interim compensation to the payee (complainant). Key provisions include:



  • Applies when the accused pleads not guilty to the Section 138 charge or upon framing of charge.

  • Compensation capped at 20% of the cheque amount (or fine imposed, whichever is higher).

  • Payable within 60 days (extendable by 30 days for reasons recorded).

  • If acquitted, the amount is refunded with interest at bank rate as notified by RBI.


The amendment aimed to deter frivolous defenses and provide quick relief to genuine complainants, addressing delays in cheque bounce litigation. Surendra Mohan Singh, S/o. Shri Parsuram Singh vs Rajendra Prasad Soni, S/o. Pannalal Soni - 2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 26842



Amendments to legislation operate prospectively unless expressly stated otherwise; thus, provisions of Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act applied only to offenses committed after its introduction. Surendra Mohan Singh, S/o. Shri Parsuram Singh vs Rajendra Prasad Soni, S/o. Pannalal Soni - 2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 26842



Prospective Application: No Retrospective Effect


A critical aspect of Section 143A NI Act is its prospective nature. Courts have consistently held it applies only to offences committed after August 2, 2018 (date of Presidential assent), not to pending cases.



Key Takeaway: If your case predates the amendment, argue against retrospective application with these precedents.


Directory vs. Mandatory: Court's Discretion


Section 143A uses may direct payment, making it directory, not mandatory. Courts exercise discretion based on facts:


When Courts Uphold Interim Compensation Orders




The discretionary power of the court to award interim compensation under Section 143-A... is based on the facts and circumstances of each case. Capital Scaffolding Through Its Proprietor Salim Chohan VS State Of Haryana - 2022 Supreme(P&H) 702



When Orders are Quashed



In Gura Singh VS Gagandeep Singh - 2022 Supreme(P&H) 981, the court held: The provision of Section 143(A) of the Negotiable Instruments Act is directory in nature and not mandatory.


| Scenario | Likely Outcome |
|----------|---------------|
| Accused delays trial repeatedly | Order upheld (discretion exercised) |
| Pre-2018 offence | Order quashed (prospective only) |
| No reasons in order | Remanded/set aside |
| Accused pleads guilty early | Rarely ordered |


Judicial Guidelines and Limitations


Courts emphasize proportionality and fairness:



High Courts remand matters for fresh consideration when trial orders lack application of mind. Fxp Fincon Pvt. Ltd. (opc) VS Peter Fernandes - 2021 Supreme(Bom) 616 Remind courts of the amendment's objects: expediting justice without prejudicing rights.


Related provisions like Section 143 mandate expeditious trials (day-to-day hearings, conclusion within 6 months), reinforcing the amendment's anti-delay intent. J. D. Kukreja VS State of Uttarakhand - 2010 Supreme(All) 2008 Vikram Kumar VS The State of West Bengal - 2010 Supreme(Cal) 13


Practical Tips for Accused and Complainants


For Accused (Drawer):



  • Challenge Timing: File petitions under CrPC Section 482 if pre-2018 or premature.

  • Seek Waiver/Reduction: Demonstrate financial hardship or strong defense.

  • Comply Promptly: Avoid contempt; appeal if aggrieved.


For Complainants (Payee):



  • Request Post-Plea: Move application after not guilty plea.

  • Evidence Delay Tactics: Strengthen case for discretion.

  • Monitor Refunds: Claim interest if acquitted (rare).


Connection to Broader NI Act Framework


Section 143A complements Section 147 (compounding) and guidelines from Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H. on costs for late compounding in cheque cases. Damodar S. Prabhu VS Sayed Babalal H. - 2010 3 Supreme 547 Late settlements attract 10-20% costs based on forum.



If the application for compounding is made before the Supreme Court, figure would increase to 20% of cheque amount. Damodar S. Prabhu VS Sayed Babalal H. - 2010 3 Supreme 547



Key Takeaways



  • Section 143A NI Act enables interim compensation up to 20% in Section 138 cases, prospectively from 2018.

  • Directory provision: Discretionary, fact-dependent; not automatic.

  • Common Pitfalls: Retrospective application, non-speaking orders – frequently quashed.

  • Judicial Trend: Balances complainant relief with accused protections; emphasizes expeditious disposal.


Stay updated on NI Act amendments, as they evolve to curb misuse while ensuring justice. For cheque bounce matters, early settlement often proves wisest.


This post synthesizes precedents like Surendra Mohan Singh, S/o. Shri Parsuram Singh vs Rajendra Prasad Soni, S/o. Pannalal Soni - 2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 26842, Gura Singh VS Gagandeep Singh - 2022 Supreme(P&H) 981, SIDHARTH JAIN,S/O- BHAG CHAND JAIN vs NIDHI FINANCIAL SERVICES, and others for educational purposes.

Search Results for "Section 143A NI Act: Interim Compensation Guide"

Damodar S. Prabhu VS Sayed Babalal H.  - 2010 3 Supreme 547

2010 3 Supreme 547 India - Supreme Court

J. M. PANCHAL, K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, P. SATHASIVAM

keeping in mind that Section 147 carries a non-obstante clause. ... (9) of Section 320 of the CrPC which states that ‘No offence shall be compounded except as provided by this Section’- A bare reading ... 147 was inserted by way of an amendment to a special law, same will override the effect of Section 320(9) of the CrPC, especially ... in transacting business on negotiable instruments. ... Presumably, Parliament a....

Gujarat Steel Tubes LTD.  VS Gujarat Steel Tubes Majdoor Sabha - 1979 Supreme(SC) 496

1979 0 Supreme(SC) 496 India - Supreme Court

A.D.KOSHAL, D.A.DESAI, V.R.KRISHNA IYER

A. Desai JJ. and the Minority, by A. D. Koshal J. - Ed. ... Earlier decision in this case to necessity to refer these appeals to a Constitution Bench in view of Art. 145 (3) is reported in ... ... PRINCIPLE IN ARTICLE 43A IS A NEW EQUATION IN INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ... It could not have its own way in taking certain matters as final and non-negotiable. ... Responsible trade unionism is an instrument of concerted action and the laissez faire law that all strikes are ipso facto conspiraci....

JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) VS UNION OF INDIA - 2017 Supreme(SC) 772

2017 0 Supreme(SC) 772 India - Supreme Court

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J. CHELAMESWAR, S. A. BOBDE, R. K. AGRAWAL, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, A. M. SAPRE, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, S. ABDUL NAZEER

fundamental constitutional value – Part of India’s commitment to a global human rights regime – Section 12clause ... quasi-constitutional status – Section 7 and 8, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms of 1982 – Informational privacy – Canadian ... Our cheques are not merely negotiable instruments but yet the world can learn a vast ....

Rustom Cowasjee Cooper: Rustom Cowasjee Cooper: T. M. Gurubuxani VS Union Of India - 1970 Supreme(SC) 42

1970 0 Supreme(SC) 42 India - Supreme Court

J.M.SHELAT, V.BHARGAVA, A.N.GROVER, A.N.RAY, C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, G.K.MITTER, I.D.DUA, J.C.SHAH, K.S.HEGDE, P.JAGANMOHAN REDDY, S.M.SIKRI

and securities whether transferable or negotiable or not, the granting and issuing of letters of credit, traveller's cheques and ... Reference to any named bank in any law, or in any contract or other instrument shall be construed as a reference to the corresponding ... Any reference to any named bank in any law other than the Ordinance, or in any contract or other instrument shall be construed as

Indore Development Authority VS Manoharlal & Ors.  Etc.  - 2020 5 Supreme 194

2020 5 Supreme 194 India - Supreme Court

ARUN MISHRA, INDIRA BANERJEE, VINEET SARAN, M.R.SHAH, S.RAVINDRA BHAT

Clauses Act, 1897 - Effect of repeal of Act, 1894 - Section 24 starting with a non obstante clause - Section 24(1)(a) providing ... 24(1) - Section 24(2) starts with a non-obstante clause overriding what is contained in Section 24(1) - Section 24(2) has to be ... after making the award five years or more before - Section 24(2) starting with a non-obstante clause....

M. Ethirajulu VS Rangam Adinarayana

India - Dishonour Of Cheque

T.CH.SURYA RAO

a cheque as required under Section 138. ... Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act a complaint ... in question was given to the complainant by the first accused in the presence of second accused—Cheque first was issued by 2nd accused ... “Holder”:—The “Holder” of a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque means any person entitled in his own name....

J. D. Kukreja VS State of Uttarakhand - 2010 Supreme(All) 2008

2010 0 Supreme(All) 2008 India - Allahabad

PRAFULLA C.PANT

section 143 of the Act. ... the case as expeditiously as possible, in line with the provisions of section 143 of the Act. ... 143 of the Act. ... Sub section (2) and Sub section (3) of section 143 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 reads as under:- ... < ... the case as expeditiously as possible, keeping in mind the spirit ....

Surendra Mohan Singh, S/o. Shri Parsuram Singh vs Rajendra Prasad Soni, S/o. Pannalal Soni - 2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 26842

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 26842 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR

VISHAL DHAGAT

(A) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 143-A - Interim compensation - Order directing the accused to deposit 20% interim ... payment of interim compensation under Section 143-A after a complaint was filed before the amendment came into effect. ... ... ... Issues: The main issue was whether the amendment to Section 143-A applies retroactively to the complainant's case. ... /law/10949~S.143"> Section 143 -....

Vikram Kumar VS The State of West Bengal - 2010 Supreme(Cal) 13

2010 0 Supreme(Cal) 13 India - Calcutta

ASHIM KUMAR ROY

evidence, emphasizing the need for expeditious conclusion of trials under Section 143(3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. ... clear violation of the mandate of Section 143(3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which requires trials to be concluded expeditiously ... emphasized the need for expeditious conclusion of trials under Section 143(3) of the Negotiable ....

Gura Singh VS Gagandeep Singh - 2022 Supreme(P&H) 984

2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 984 India - Punjab and Haryana

KARAMJIT SINGH

Section 143(A) of the Act. ... Section 143(A) - Negotiable Instruments Act - The court held that the provision of Section 143(A) of the Negotiable Instruments ... under Section 143(A) of the Negotiable Instruments Act was valid. ... As per the latest provision by insertion of Section 143(A) of Negot....

Surendra Mohan Singh, S/o. Shri Parsuram Singh vs Rajendra Prasad Soni, S/o. Pannalal Soni

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 26842 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR

VISHAL DHAGAT

/law/10949~S.143"> Section 143 -A of the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2018 (20 of 2018). As per said Amendment Act, trial Court is vested with power to direct accused person to deposit interim compensation not exceeding 20% of the amount of the cheque. ... /law/10949~S.143"> Section 143 -A of the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2018 (20 of 2018).7. In view of same, order dated 24.12.2018 is quashed. ... /law/10949~S.143"> Section 143 -A of the #H....

Sidharth Jain VS Nidhi Financial Services - 2022 Supreme(Raj) 1418

2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 1418 India - Rajasthan

FARJAND ALI

I have gone through the order passed by the Court below, I deem it appropriate to allow the instant miscellaneous petition on the following terms that the provision contained in Section 143 of the Negotiable of Instruments Act has no retrospective application as decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in ... By way of the instant miscellaneous petition, a challenge has been made to the order dated 04.04.2019 passed by the Special Magistrate No.7, Negotiable of Instruments Act Cases, Jaipur Metro Jaipur. ......

Ideal Real Estates Pvt.  Ltd.  VS Aris Capital Pvt.  Ltd.  - 2023 Supreme(Cal) 286

2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 286 India - Calcutta

SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)

There was an imminent need for remedying the situation which was addressed by the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002. Sections 143 to 147 were inserted in the Act, which came into force on 06.02.2003. ... The Learned Magistrate by an order dated 18.06.2019, erroneously held that despite the willingness of the petitioner to pay the amount of the dishonoured cheque, in the absence of consent of the opposite party, the proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrumen....

SIDHARTH JAIN,S/O- BHAG CHAND JAIN vs NIDHI FINANCIAL SERVICES

India - High Court of Rajasthan - High Court Bench at Jaipur

of the Negotiable of Instruments Act has no retrospective application Metro Jaipur. ... ;left:108pt">been made to the order dated 04.04.2019 passed by the Special Magistrate No.7, Negotiable ... of Instruments Act Cases, Jaipur Metro Jaipur and the subsequent order dated 27.02.2020 are hereby quashed the order dated 04.04.2019 passed by the Special Magistrate No.7, Negotiable

Rita Plastic Private Limited vs State of West Bengal - 2025 Supreme(Cal) 967

2025 0 Supreme(Cal) 967 India - IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

JAY SENGUPTA

The Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2018 ("Amendment Act") became effective from the 1st of September 2018 after the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Bill, 2017 was given the Presidential assent on the 2nd of August 2018. ... /law/10949~S.148">Section 148 was introduced by way of the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2018 with the primary object of addressing undue delays in the disposal of appeals arising out of convictions under . ... Without granting any opportunity....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top