AI Overview

AI Overview...

#RajasthanCoopAct, #Section57, #CoopLaw

Understanding Section 57 of the Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 2001


The Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 2001 (the Act) governs the functioning, management, and regulation of cooperative societies in Rajasthan. Among its provisions, Section 57 stands out as a critical tool for oversight, empowering authorities to conduct enquiries into the affairs of cooperative societies. But what does the legal interpretation of Section 57 Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act entail? This blog post breaks down its scope, procedural requirements, and judicial insights, drawing from key court decisions. Note: This is general information based on precedents and not specific legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.


What is Section 57?


Section 57 of the Act deals with enquiries into the constitution, working, and financial condition of a cooperative society. It allows designated authorities, such as the Registrar or other officers, to initiate probes under subsections like 57(1) for special audits or inspections. Typically:
- Subsection (1): Registrar may direct an enquiry if there's suspicion of irregularities.
- Subsection (2): Powers conferred on special auditors or officers.


This provision ensures accountability but must align with principles of natural justice. Courts have repeatedly emphasized that enquiries cannot be arbitrary. DEVENDRA SINGH VERMA S/O SHRI SARDAR SINGH VERMA Vs. REGISTER COOPERATIVE SOCIETY - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 5383


Key Triggers for Section 57 Enquiries



  • Complaints of mismanagement or financial irregularities.

  • Suspicion of non-compliance with bye-laws or Act provisions.

  • Routine audits post-change in leadership or on Registrar's direction.


Judicial Interpretation: Procedural Safeguards


Courts, particularly the Rajasthan High Court, have shaped the legal interpretation of Section 57 Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act through writ petitions challenging enquiry orders. A recurring theme is the mandatory requirement of notice and opportunity of hearing.


Notice and Natural Justice Essential


In one case, an enquiry under Section 57(1) was initiated without notice to the petitioner by the Additional Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Ajmer Division. The court observed: behind his back and without issuing any notice to the petitioner, one enquiry was conducted... under Section 55 of the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 2001. This violated natural justice, rendering the process flawed. DEVENDRA SINGH VERMA S/O SHRI SARDAR SINGH VERMA Vs. REGISTER COOPERATIVE SOCIETY - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 5383


Similarly, in another writ, the order dated 27.12.2024 by the Deputy Registrar, Tonk, initiating enquiry under Section 57(1) was scrutinized. The petitioner argued lack of prior notice, highlighting: enquiry under Section 57(1) of Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 (for short ‘the Act of 2001’) was initiated against the petitioner. Courts stressed that the principles of natural justice require that a person be given an opportunity of hearing before an order is passed against him. BHOMRAJ VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - 1994 Supreme(Raj) 221


Key Ruling Points:
- No ex-parte enquiries; notice must precede action.
- Affected parties (e.g., office-bearers) get a chance to respond.
- Violation leads to quashing of orders. BHANU PRAKASH SHARMA vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN - 2023 Supreme(Online)(RAJ) 18762


Jurisdiction of Authorities


Who can invoke Section 57? Deputy Registrars, Joint Registrars, and Additional Registrars often act under delegated powers.



Courts clarify: Delegation must be explicit; arbitrary exercise is invalid. BEAWAR URBAN COOP BANK LTD vs STATE COOP DEPARTMENTAND ANR


Landmark Cases on Abuse and Limits


Abuse of Process


Frivolous enquiries mirroring PIL abuses are discouraged. In a broader context, courts noted: Public Interest Litigation – Abuse of –Should be discouraged... genuine and bona fide public interest litigation must be encouraged whereas frivolous public interest litigation should be discouraged. While not directly Section 57, analogous to coop enquiries. State of Uttaranchal VS Balwant Singh Chaufal - 2010 1 Supreme 227


In coop-specific matters: The action of the first respondent in seeking to appoint... is not sustainable in law. Overreach in appointments triggered Section 57 probes, but procedural lapses invalidated them. Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative . . . Appellant Bank Maryadit VS Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit - 2020 Supreme(SC) 238


Interplay with Other Sections



Comparative Table of Key Cases:


| Case ID | Issue | Ruling |
|---------|-------|--------|
| DEVENDRA SINGH VERMA S/O SHRI SARDAR SINGH VERMA Vs. REGISTER COOPERATIVE SOCIETY - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 5383 | No notice for enquiry | Violates natural justice; quash order |
| CHANDMAL KOTHARI Vs. THE REGISTRAR - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 12979 | Deputy Registrar proceedings | Interim stay; full hearing required |
| BHOMRAJ VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - 1994 Supreme(Raj) 221 | Opportunity of hearing | Essential before adverse order |
| RAMESHWAR PRASAD S/O SHRI RAM NARAYAN vs JOINT REGISTRAR | Overlap with old Act Section 70 | Section 57 applies post-2001 |


Broader Context: Cooperative Governance


Rajasthan's coop sector, including banks, faces scrutiny. Coop banks aren't always 'State' under Article 12, limiting writ maintainability: cooperative societies registered under the Cooperative Societies Act are not State within the meaning of Article 12. Amulya Singh VS Nagareeya Sahkari Bank Ltd. , Varanasi - 2001 Supreme(All) 1196


Yet, Section 57 ensures transparency. Recent amendments and 97th Constitutional Amendment emphasize democratic functioning: Co-operatives movement in India... to ensure democratic, autonomous and professional functioning. UNION OF INDIA VS RAJENDRA N SHAH - 2021 Supreme(SC) 367


Change of Government and Policy


Policy shifts post-elections can't nullify valid enquiries arbitrarily, akin to education Acts: Unless it is found that act done... is unreasonable... the State should not change its stand. State of Tamil Nadu VS K. Shyam Sunder - 2011 8 Supreme 613


Key Takeaways



  • Always Demand Notice: Section 57 enquiries must provide prior notice and hearing.

  • Jurisdiction Check: Verify delegating order for Registrar's powers.

  • Timely Challenge: File writs under Article 226 if violated.

  • Natural Justice Paramount: Courts quash non-compliant orders.


In summary, the legal interpretation of Section 57 Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act prioritizes fairness. Authorities wield power for public good, but procedural due process is non-negotiable. Societies must comply, while challenging infirmities promptly.


Disclaimer: Legal outcomes depend on facts. This post synthesizes precedents like State of Uttaranchal VS Balwant Singh Chaufal - 2010 1 Supreme 227, DEVENDRA SINGH VERMA S/O SHRI SARDAR SINGH VERMA Vs. REGISTER COOPERATIVE SOCIETY - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 5383, etc., for informational purposes. Seek professional advice for case-specific guidance.


Search Results for "Section 57 Rajasthan Coop Societies Act: Legal Insights"

State of Uttaranchal VS Balwant Singh Chaufal - 2010 1 Supreme 227

2010 1 Supreme 227 India - Supreme Court

DALVEER BHANDARI

to provide access to justice to a very large section of the society which was otherwise not getting any benefit from the judicial ... of judicial review realized that a very large section of the society because of extreme poverty, ignorance, discrimination and illiteracy ... under article 21 of the Constitution-The rule of locus standi was diluted and the traditional meaning of ‘aggrieved person’ was broadened ... Environmental PIL has emerged because of the court’s interpretation of Article#H....

Official Liquidator VS Dayanand - 2008 7 Supreme 671

2008 7 Supreme 671 India - Supreme Court

G.S.SINGHVI, B.N.AGARWAL, HARJIT SINGH BEDI

(a) Interpretation of Judgment – Supreme Court, while agreeing with the reasoning of the High Courts and dismissing the appeals, ... For Calcutta High Court, the Central Government had appointed a Court Liquidator under Section 38A of the ... ... (e) Service Law – Regularisation – State cannot invoke Article ... Registrar, Cooperative Societies,41 [2004 (7) SCC 112], decided by a three-Judges Bench, wherein it was ... Rules 308 and 309 of 1959 Rules, which were framed by this Court u....

Zee Telefilms LTD.  VS Union Of India - 2005 1 Supreme 886

2005 1 Supreme 886 India - Supreme Court

H.K.SEMA, N.S.HEGDE, S.N.VARIAVA, B.P.SINGH

’ within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution—Whether the Board can be held to be a State for the purpose of Article 12 ... India—Articles 12, 32 and 226—Tamil Nadu Societies ... Registration Act—Writ Petition—Maintainability against the Board of Control for Cricket in India—Cricket Board ... Recently a Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court in Santosh Mittal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. ... At one point of time, the c....

Indira Nehru Gandhi, Raj Narain VS Raj Narain, Indira Nehru Gandhi - 1975 Supreme(SC) 440

1975 0 Supreme(SC) 440 India - Supreme Court

A.N.RAY, H.R.KHANNA, K.K.MATHEW, M.H.BEG, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD

Code, 1973 - Section 491 , 22 , 85 - Emergency Powers Acts, 1939 - Amendment Act, 1975 – Section 10 ... Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Section a href=act:214 ... 329A in Constitution - Clause 4 of Article 329A is challenged in present appeals - Held, In regard to cross-appeal filed thought ... State of Rajasthan. ... Act, 1893, and the Friendly Societies Act, 1896." .......

Som Prakash Rekhi VS Union Of India - 1980 Supreme(SC) 492

1980 0 Supreme(SC) 492 India - Supreme Court

V.R.KRISHNA IYER, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, R.S.PATHAK

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION FALLS WITIHN DEFINITION OF “STATE” WHETHER AN ENTITY A STATE AGENCY OR INSTRUMENTALITY— FACTORS FOR ... CONSIDERATION—STATE CHIEF FUNDING AUTHORITY FOR FINANCIAL RESOURCE—FUNCTIONAL CHARACTER ESSENTIALLY GOVERNMENTAL—PLENARY CONTROL ... The petitioner's attempt to recover his full pension under Section 33C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act failed since that jurisdiction ... societies you cannot call it an authority. ... ... The expressio....

Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative . . . Appellant Bank Maryadit VS Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit - 2020 Supreme(SC) 238

2020 0 Supreme(SC) 238 India - Supreme Court

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AJAY RASTOGI

Co-Operative Societies Act I960. ... a notification under Section 54(3) for Cooperative Banks which are Central Societies falling within the ambit of Section 49-E(2) ... (Para 31) (b) Act, 1960 - Section 54(3)(a) and (b) - Section 54(3) deals with a class of societies and appointment ... of only one meaning, then no question of interpretation a....

Vijay Kumar Sharma VS Jodhpur Nagrik Sahkari Bank Ltd.  - 2009 Supreme(Raj) 2489

2009 0 Supreme(Raj) 2489 India - Rajasthan

A.M.KAPADIA, DEO NARAYAN THANVI

(a) Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 – S. 128, (since repealed) – Rajasthan Co ... Societies Act, 1965, (since repealed) – S. 128 – Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 – S. 107 – The present matter relates ... repealed) – Rajasthan Cooperative Societies#HL_....

Amulya Singh VS Nagareeya Sahkari Bank Ltd. , Varanasi - 2001 Supreme(All) 1196

2001 0 Supreme(All) 1196 India - Allahabad

YATINDRA SINGH

The Court held that cooperative societies registered under the Cooperative Societies Act are not State within the meaning of Article ... Whether every co-operative society, registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, is a State within the meaning of Article 12 ... Whether a co-operative....

SRI BIJAYNAGAR KRAY VIKRAYA SAHAKARI SAMITI LTD. BIKANER vs ADDT./JT/DY.CIT/ITO  NFAC   DELHI - 2024 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 2408

2024 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 2408 India - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Jodhpur Bench)

RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM, DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM

... ... Issues: Whether income from Co-operative Banks qualifies for deductions available to Co-operative Societies under Section ... not qualify under Section 80P(2)(d) as these banks are not classed as Co-operative Societies for deduction purposes - Relevant judgments ... not eligible for deductions under Section 80P - The Tribunal found that income from Co-operative....

BHOMRAJ VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - 1994 Supreme(Raj) 221

1994 0 Supreme(Raj) 221 India - Rajasthan

J.R.CHOPRA, P.K.PALLI

The petitioner was elected as Chairman of Barsinghsar Lalamdeshar Gram Sewa Sahakari Samiti and represented it in the Central Cooperative ... Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Rajasthan, Jaipur 1989 (1) RLR 29, a Division Bench of this Court has observed that remedy available ... Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 (for short the Act) on the ground that the petitioner-appellant has incurred disqualification under ... That petition unde....

DEVENDRA SINGH VERMA S/O SHRI SARDAR SINGH VERMA Vs. REGISTER COOPERATIVE SOCIETY - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 5383

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 5383 India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jaipur Bench)

ANAND SHARMA

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that behind his back and without issuing any notice to the petitioner, one enquiry was conducted by the Additional Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Ajmer Division, Ajmer under Section 55 of the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 (for short ‘the Act ... Thus, it comes out from bare reading of provisions of Section 57 of the Act of 2001 that the enquiry under Section#HL_EN....

HANUMAN PRASAD MEENA S/O SHRI KALYAN MAL MEENA Vs. REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 2232

2026 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 2232 India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jaipur Bench)

ANAND SHARMA

By way of filing this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the order dated 27.12.2024 issued by the office of Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Tonk, whereby enquiry under Section 57(1) of Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 2001 (for short ‘the Act of 2001’) was initiated against the petitioner ... Registrar Cooperative Societies, Rajasthan, Sahkar Bhawan, Jaipur. 2. Deputy Registrar, Coope....

Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative . . . Appellant Bank Maryadit VS Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit

2020 0 Supreme(SC) 238 India - Supreme Court

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, AJAY RASTOGI

On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent urged that: (i) Section 57-B of the 1960 Act was inserted by the Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies (Amendment) Act 2012 ["2012 Amendment Act"]. ... By virtue of the 2012 Amendment Act, Section 57-B was introduced as a new Chapter V-A with provisions for short term Co-operative Credit Structure Societies. ... By the ....

CHANDMAL KOTHARI Vs. THE REGISTRAR - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 12979

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 12979 India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jodhpur Bench)

MUNNURI LAXMAN

2) This Court, vide order dated 24.04.2024, has passed an interim direction staying the order dated 06.03.2024 passed by respondent No.3-Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bhilwara, whereby the proceedings under Section 57 of the Rajasthan Cooperative Society ... 10) In the backdrop of the above contention, it is apt to refer to Section 57 of the Act of 2001, which reads as follows:- “57. ... 10.1) A reading of the second ....

G P JORWAL vs REG CO OP SOCIETIES AND ORS

India - High Court of Rajasthan - High Court Bench at Jaipur

57 of the Act, 2001. ... 107 of the Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, Cooperative Societies Act, 2001 dt. 28/06/2010 duty casted upon the authority to call upon the 57 of the Act, 2991 stands frustrated.

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top