The petitioner’s arguments rely heavily on the Supreme Court's decision, but some judgments indicate that compliance with procedural statutes like Section 33(2)(b) is crucial, and failure to do so may undermine the petitioner’s case THE MANAGER, OPERATIONAL HEAD GVK(Not Applicable) vs AMBULANCE SEWA, CONTRACT WORKERS UNION (INTUC)(Not Applicable) - Himachal Pradesh, THE MANAGER, OPERATIONAL HEAD GVK Vs 108 AMBULANCE SEWA, CONTRACT WORKERS UNION (INTUC) - Himachal Pradesh.
Analysis and Conclusion:
DORAIRAJ SPINTEX Petitioner(s) VERSUS R. ... U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30511/2018 SRI
He relies upon Sri Dorairaj Spintex v. R.Chittibabu and others, (2021) 12 SCC 38, Lalla Ram v. D.C.M.Chemical Works Ltd and another, (1978) 3 SCC 1 and Jaipur Zila Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd. V. ... In paras 8 and 9 of Sri Dorairaj Spintex’s case (1 supra), this issue has been discussed and the Hon’ble Supreme Court clearly held whether the action is connected to the dispute or not has to be decided on the basis of the facts of each case. ... This Court has heard Sri O.Manohar Red....
The learned Counsel would place reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Sri Dorairaj Spintex Vs. R.Chittibabu and Ors.
The learned Counsel would place reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Sri Dorairaj Spintex Vs.
The learned Counsel would place reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Sri Dorairaj Spintex Vs. R.Chittibabu and Ors. , a href="./..
In support of his arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on a judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.5897 of 2021, titled Sri Dorairaj Spintex Versus R. Chittibabu & Ors., decided on September 22, 2021. ... The judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner in Sri Dorairaj Spintex’s case (supra), fails to advance the case of the petitioner as in the said case, there had been due compliance of Section 33(2)(b) of the Act.
In support of his arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on a judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.5897 of 2021, titled Sri Dorairaj Spintex Versus R. Chittibabu & Ors., decided on September 22, 2021. ... The judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner in Sri Dorairaj Spintex’s case (supra), fails to advance the case of the petitioner as in the said case, there had been due compliance of Section 33(2)(b) of the Act.
Further, in the case of Sri Dorairaj Spintex vs. R. Chittibabu & Others reported in (2021) 12 SCC 38 (paras 8-12) the Hon’ble Court has reiterated the scope of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in the same line.
The Assistant Commissioner of Labour advised the petitioner on 22.06.2000 to join in the transferred place, directed the management to pay the arrears of salary and back wages due to the petitioner and also suggested the management to provide alternate employment at Sri Durairaj Spintex. ... He was transferred to Sri Kantha Spinners owned by the Madras Spinners Limited. While so on 27.08.1999 he was deputed to work at Kolumamkondan. Admittedly there was no establishment. Even according to the 2nd respondent they were int....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.