AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
Under Section 149 of the MRTP Act, civil suits against officers for acts beyond their jurisdiction are typically not maintainable due to the statutory bar designed to protect the planning authority's decisions and actions. The courts have consistently upheld that Section 149 creates a self-contained jurisdiction, excluding civil courts from adjudicating disputes related to development permissions and related acts. Therefore, any suit challenging such acts, especially on grounds of exceeding jurisdiction, is likely to be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Search Results for "Suit Maintainable against Corporation if Officer Act Beyond Jurisdiction Section 149 of Mrtp"

Vandana Creations Pvt. Ltd.  VS Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

2016 0 Supreme(Bom) 1175 India - Bombay

SHALINI PHANSALKAR JOSHI

MRTP Act - Jurisdiction - Section 149 - Section 53(1) - Section 9A CPC - [Section 149, Section 53(1), Section 9A CPC] - The court ... and the bar under Section 149 of the MRTP Act applied, excluding the jurisdiction#HL....

Vandana Creations Pvt.  Ltd. , A Company registered under the Companies Act VS Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

2016 0 Supreme(Bom) 1644 India - Bombay

SHALINI PHANSALKAR JOSHI

MRTP Act - Jurisdiction of Civil Court - Section 149 of MRTP Act - Summary of Acts and Sections: MRTP Act, 1966, Section 149 - ... The court discussed the jurisdiction of the Civil Court in the context of Section 149 of the #HL_....

Prathamesh Tower Co-operative Housing Society Limited VS Gorai Road (Borivali) Shree Ganesh Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.

2013 0 Supreme(Bom) 759 India - Bombay

A.P.BHANGALE

and can not be labeled as unconstitutional or beyond jurisdiction of the MCGM as planning authority. ... Thus, the jurisdiction of the Civil Court is expressly and clearly excluded under Section 149 of the M.R.T.P. ... authority, is self contained under the MRTP Act in Section 44 read with Section 53 (3) of the MRTP ....

Kiran Nanik Motwane VS Uday Indukumar Jasani

2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1311 India - Bombay

R.I.CHAGLA

(A) Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 - Section 149 - Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 41 and 47 - ... Court noted that plans were permitted by the Municipal Corporation after evaluation of complaints and necessary adjustments were ... (Paras 2, 63, 76) ... ... (B) Jurisdiction of Civil Courts - Civil Courts may ... either under Section 149#HL_E....

Raja Bahadur Motilal & another VS State of Maharashtra & others

2002 0 Supreme(Bom) 747 India - Bombay

P.V.KAKADE, V.G.PALSHIKAR

of Section 45 beyond permissible limits. ... It is obvious, therefore, that a suit or legal proceeding for quashing a deemed permission under Section 45(5) is maintainable. ... 149 - Permission or refusal for construction - Challenged in a civil suit - Scope of Section 149 regarding bar - Section 149#HL_END....

Kiran Nanik Motwane vs Uday Indukumar Jasani

India - Bombay High Court

R.I. CHAGLA, J

(A) MRTP Act, 1966 - Section 149 - MMC Act, 1988 - Section 527 - Building development permissions - Injunction sought against construction ... either under Section 149 of the MRTP Act or Section 527 of the ... is in view of the bar under Section 149 of the #HL_S....

Sujala Yeshwant Nitsure and others VS Municipal Corporation of City of Pune and others

1995 0 Supreme(Bom) 447 India - Bombay

M.S.RANE

Whether the suit is not maintainable under section 486 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act. 14. ... Whether notice under section 487 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act is necessary. 15. ... Whether this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain and try this suit. This Court has j....

Girish Vyas VS The State of Maharashtra

2012 1 Supreme 97 India - Supreme Court

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, H.L.GOKHALE

126 of the MRTP Act read with Section 6 of Land Acquisition Act and the same was valid ... The acquisition of concerned plot of land was complete with declaration under Section 126 of the MRTP Act ... read with Section 6 of Land Acquisition Act and the same was valid and legal. ... Was the civil suit mainta....

Manohar Joshi VS State of Maharashtra

2011 0 Supreme(SC) 1210 India - Supreme Court

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, H.L.GOKHALE

Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Section 10 - Bombay Town Planning Act 1954 - Section ... 9 - Acquisition Act 1894 - Section 6 - MRTP Act - Section 126 – Claim of compensation – Acquisition of Land – Acquittal - Court may ... this judgment - Former occupants will continue to reside in building const....

City Industrial & Development Corporation Through its Administrator, CIDCO VS Sunil

2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 623 India - Bombay

R.D.DHANUKA, SUNIL K.KOTWAL

Act, 1894 - section 18 - MRTP Act - section 126(4) - Insofar as First Appeal is concerned same is filed against order passed in ... Civil Procedure Code,1908 - Section 89 - Enhanced compensation - Appellant was appointment - Land Acquisition ... question which was owned by him was forming part and parcel of CIDCO area New Aurangabad and was within local limits of Municipal Corp....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top