AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion: Unregistered General Power of Attorney, especially in the context of buses or property rights, generally lacks legal enforceability unless supported by registration and proper stamping. Courts tend to scrutinize unregistered documents, often dismissing claims based on such documents due to their potential invalidity. Additionally, PILs filed by unregistered bodies are typically not entertained, emphasizing the importance of registration for legal standing. Trademark protection for unregistered marks hinges on reputation rather than registration, with courts recognizing their rights based on goodwill. Overall, registration is crucial for the validity and enforceability of PoAs and related legal actions.

References: - Special Land Acquisition Officer VS Majas Madhu Co-operative Housing Society - Bombay - PRATHYASA MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELLING FORUM vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala - Prathyasa Mental Health Counselling Forum VS State of Kerala - Kerala - K. M. Viswanathan Pillai VS K. M. Shanmugam Pillai - Madras - S. N. R. DHALL MILL, A registered partnership firm represented by its Managing Partner R. Surendran VS Kaleesuwari Refinary Private Limited, Chennai - Madras - THE SPL LAND ACQN OFFICER vs MAJAS MADHU CO-OP HSG.SOC. AND B.E.S.T. and UNDERTAKING - Bombay

Search Results for "Unregistered General Power of Attorney for Buses"

Ashok Leyland Limited represented by its General Manager-Legal and Constituted Attorney S.  Venkataraman VS Blue Hill Logistics Pvt.  Ltd. , Bengaluru

2010 0 Supreme(Mad) 5495 India - Madras

V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN

plaintiff, engaged in the business of manufacturing commercial vehicles, registered the trademark LUXURA in 2007 and launched luxury buses ... It was pointed out in the said judgment that a different interpretation would place the proprietor of a registered trade mark in no better position than the proprietor of an unregistered mark. ... The power to attract customers depends on one or more of the other factors as well. In the case of a theatre or restaurant, what is catered, how the service is run and what the competition is, contribute ....

PRATHYASA MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELLING FORUM vs STATE OF KERALA

2020 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 49156 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, SHAJI P.CHALY, J

(A) Constitution of India - Article 21 - Public Interest Litigation - Maintainability of writ petition by unregistered body - The ... The Court ruled the writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioners are an unregistered body, hence lacking juristic personality ... ... ... Findings of Court: ... The writ petition was found to be not maintainable as it was filed by an unregistered body lacking ... It must fairly be stated that the learned Attorney General has taken no objection to a non-recognis....

Prathyasa Mental Health Counselling Forum VS State of Kerala

2020 0 Supreme(Ker) 341 India - Kerala

S. MANIKUMAR, SHAJI P. CHALY

in the same way as a natural or human person- Prathyasa Mental Health Counselling forum, through its Programme Co-ordinator, an unregistered ... an analysis of law relating to precedents, binding effect of interim orders and maintainability of filing a writ petition by an unregistered ... the facts and circumstances of this case, we are of the view that instant writ petition filed as Public Interest Litigation by an unregistered ... It must fairly be stated that the learned Attorney General has taken no....

PRATHYASA MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELLING FORUM Vs STATE OF KERALA

2020 Supreme(Online)(KER) 19335 India - High Court of Kerala

S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, SHAJI P.CHALY, J

Issues: Whether a public interest litigation can be maintained by an unregistered body and if the notification allowing full ... Final Decision: The writ petition is dismissed due to maintainability issues of an unregistered body, though the court highlighted ... Decidendi: The right to life under Article 21 necessitates the enforcement of social distancing despite economic implications, and unregistered ... It must fairly be stated that the learned Attorney General has taken no objection to a non-rec....

K.  M.  Viswanathan Pillai VS K.  M.  Shanmugam Pillai

1965 0 Supreme(Mad) 300 India - Madras

M.NATESAN, M.ANANTANARAYANAN

As the defendant desired to proceed to Kuala Lumpur on business, he executed a general power-of-attorney (Exhibit A-55) in favour of the plaintiff. ... The plaintiff prayed for a declaration that the five buses referred to by him in paragraph 18(a) of his plaint belonged to him, as also the stage carriage permits, and he was entiled to run the same in terms of the power-of-attorney dated 28th October, 1954 which was irrevocable. ... The appellant contended that the money passed in circ....

S. N. R.  DHALL MILL, A registered partnership firm represented by its Managing Partner R.  Surendran VS Kaleesuwari Refinary Private Limited, Chennai

2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 870 India - Madras

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

The plaintiff also claimed that they have gained goowill and reputation among the trade circle and general public. It is also claimed to be a well established and well known trademark. They have businesses across the country. ... It is not a matter for microscopic inspection, but to be taken from the general and even casual point of view of a customer walking into a shop.” 55. In Amritdhara Pharmacy Vs. ... Broadly stated in an action for passing off on the basis of unregistered trade mark generally for deciding the question of deceptive ....

Special Land Acquisition Officer VS Majas Madhu Co-operative Housing Society

2020 0 Supreme(Bom) 852 India - Bombay

G.S.KULKARNI

In Krishna Sheena Shetty's case one of the parties sought to produce two documents to assert rights in respect of the suit property, namely, 'agreement for sale' and 'general power of attorney', which were neither registered nor sufficiently stamped. ... Learned Counsel, firstly, submits that the document is inadequately stamped and unregistered. The document is an agreement of assignment of development rights. ... As a result, there are situations in which the actual owner, say, of an apartment in a multi-storeyed build....

SUSHIL ANSAL 							  vs STATE OF DELHI THRU CBI

India - Delhi High Court

Moressa [1893] 1 QB 359, ―the AttorneyGeneral has asked where we are to draw the line. The reasonably be drawn. ... Malhotra, Deputy General Manager, Shri R.K. ... 1.10 Between 3.55 and 4.55 p.m. there was a general power shut down; however the cinema show continued. ... Gopal Ansal and the evidence of PW-87, the Registrar of Societies, who acknowledged that Form No. 32 was on record, though unregistered. ... He deposed that unregistered documents....

BLUE HILL LOGISTICS PVT LTD vs ASHOK LEYLAND LIMITED

India - Madras High Court

Manager – Legal, and Constituted Attorney mark would have no more protection than the Proprietor of Guindy, Chennai – 600 032, Section 29 (1) of Trade Marks Act is a general ... after review of performance of the buses.

THE SPL LAND ACQN OFFICER vs MAJAS MADHU CO-OP HSG.SOC. AND B.E.S.T. and UNDERTAKING

India - Bombay High Court - Original Side,Bombay

power of attorney’, which were neither registered nor sufficiently stamped. ... of attorney is not the legal owner of a property. …. .. … ..” ... Learned Counsel, firstly, submits that the majas LAR-spking.odt Acquisition Officer (3) (supra) dated 29 January 2009 as also the decision in The General

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

back ground Icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top