SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Ker) 341

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S. Manikumar, Shaji P. Chaly, JJ.
Prathyasa Mental Health Counselling Forum - Petitioner
Versus
State of Kerala & Ors. - Respondents
Wp(C).No.11686 of 2020(S)
Decided On : 19-06-2020

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. Saju Jakob., Sri. Anil Kumar Sreedharan
For the Respondent:Sri. Ranjith Thampan, Addl.Advocate General, Sri. P. Narayanan, Senior Govt. Pleader, Shri. P.Vijayakumar, ASG of India

IMPORTANT POINTS
An unregistered Association is not a Juristic person and that apart no legal or any other right of the said Association was violated and, hence, the said Association was violated and, hence, the said Association was not aggrieved person. This Court further held in the aforesaid decisions that since the grievance of the members of the said Association were never aggrieved, they ought not to have filed writ petition as any legal right, if any, were never infringed and the instant writ petition ought not to be maintained.

Headnote:

Constitution of India- Article 21 - 'Person' refers to human being. 'Jurstic person' refers to a body recognized by the law as being entitled to rights and duties in the same way as a natural or human person- Prathyasa Mental Health Counselling forum, through its Programme Co-ordinator, an unregistered body does not fall within the definition of juristic person.

Statement of facts:

Petitioner, a charitable non-registered organization, is constrained to file this public interest litigation against the impugned provision of Exhibit-P1 notification issued by the Transport Department, Government of Kerala vide No.GO(P) No 29/2020/Tran. S.R.O. No. 366/2020 dated 02.06.2020. The impugned provision is, “AND WHEREAS the Government have decided to relax the lockdown restrictions and decided to permit to carry passengers in all the seats available in the stage carriages". It is further stated that as per the impugned provision, State of Kerala has decided to relax the lockdown restrictions and as a result of which, permitted to carry passengers in all the seats available in the stage carriages. Petitioner has further stated that through the notification of Transport (B) Department, Government of Kerala vide SRO No. 333/2020 dated 19.05.2020, in order to effectuate the necessity of social distancing, Government have permitted to carry passengers not more than the 50% of seating capacity of the carriage-When it can be said that the spread of infection is almost on the verge of community transmission and where now more than 2 lakhs people have been infected in the country, State of Kerala has decided to relax the measures taken specifically for carrying out social distancing.

Finding of the court:

On an analysis of law relating to precedents, binding effect of interim orders and maintainability of filing a writ petition by an unregistered body, and the facts and circumstances of this case, we are of the view that instant writ petition filed as Public Interest Litigation by an unregistered body viz., Prathyasa Mental Health Counselling forum, through its Programme Co-ordinator, is not maintainable.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

S. Manikumar, J.

Instant public interest writ petition is filed for the following relief’s:

(i) To direct respondents 1 & 2, State of Kerala represented by Chief Secretary and the Secretary, Transport (B) Department, Thiruvananthapuram -to forthwith ensure the strict/actual/practical compliance of social distancing norm in public places issued by respondent No.3, Ministry of Home Affairs, vide its Order No.40-3/2020-DM-1(A) dated 30th May, 2020, as mandated in national directives for COVID-19 management, in the clause 2);

(ii)To quash the impugned provision of Exhibit-P1 notification dated 2nd June, 2020, S.R.O. No.366/2020, allowing the buses to carry passengers in all the seats available in the stage carriers as it is in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and above notification of Ministry of Home Affairs, and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to issue order directing passengers only to occupy 50% seats available, and to maintain a distance of six feet between passengers in public transport, till the vaccine for COVID-19 virus is invented or till the alternative solution is found or till the Central Government otherwise issues another order with respect to public transport/travel advisory;

(iii)To direct respondents 1 & 2, either to disinfect the vehicles and disinfect the seats when a passenger disembark;

(iv) To direct respondents 1 and 2, either to maintain six feet distance in the allocation of seats or to keep one passenger in one seat or in alternative seat or keep the middle seat vacant if it is a 3-seater chair to serve the purpose of social distancing in the buses with the stickers marking the seats to be left vacant.

2. Short facts leading to the filing of writ petition are as follows:-

Petitioner, a charitable non-registered organization, is constrained to file this public interest litigation against the impugned provision of Exhibit-P1 notification issued by the Transport Department, Government of Kerala vide No.GO(P) No 29/2020/Tran. S.R.O. No. 366/2020 dated 02.06.2020. The impugned provision is, “AND WHEREAS the Government have decided to relax the lockdown restrictions and decided to permit to carry passengers in all the seats available in the stage carriages". It is further stated that as per the impugned provision, State of Kerala has decided to relax the lockdown restrictions and as a result of which, permitted to carry passengers in all the seats available in the stage carriages. Petitioner has further stated that through the notification of Transport (B) Department, Government of Kerala vide SRO No. 333/2020 dated 19.05.2020, in order to effectuate the necessity of social distancing, Government have permitted to carry passengers not more than the 50% of seating capacity of the carriage. In the current situation, when it can be said that the spread of infection is almost on the verge of community transmission and where now more than 2 lakhs people have been infected in the country, State of Kerala has decided to relax the measures taken specifically for carrying out social distancing. The efforts of State of Kerala, in order to check the spread of COVID-19 has won accolades from across the globe, but the number of infected persons have grown up to 80 on the first day of June itself. Petitioner has further contended that the State of Kerala has tried its best to evanescence the COVID-19 out of Kerala and yet could not achieve the desired result, and the relaxation of social distancing measures during the lockdown period would adversely affect the health and life of people and would create dangerous repercussions, which can lead to loss of numerous lives.

3. Being aggrieved, the petitioner filed the instant writ petition on the following grounds:

A. The impugned provision of Exhibit-P1 notification issued by the respondents is arbitrary and harmful to the life and health of the people of Kerala, hence ultra vires.

B.The impugned provision of the notification violates the mandatory guidelines

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top