2025-12-15
Subject:
JOTHI @ NAGAJOTHI vs THE STATE, REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Subject: Criminal Law – Drug Offences
Keywords: conviction, Narcotics, evidence, legal standards, procedural lapses, weight discrepancies, possession, sentencing, mandatory minimum, integrity of samples
The presence of minor procedural lapses does not undermine the prosecution's case if the overall evidence clearly supports the conviction in drug possession cases.
(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29(1) - Conviction and sentence of 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine upheld by the High Court for possession of commercial quantity of ganja - Prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt the appellant’s conscious possession and integrity of seized samples despite minor procedural irregularities. (...
Saraswati Wire and Cable Industries VS Mohammad Moinuddin Khan
Subject: Corporate Law – Insolvency
Keywords: CIRP, IBC, pre-existing disputes, operational debt, admission, NCLT, NCLAT, ledger account, evidence, payment
Unsubstantiated claims of pre-existing disputes do not impede the admission of an application under Section 9 of the IBC.
(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 9 - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) - Admission of CIRP against corporate debtor was denied by NCLAT citing pre-existing disputes between parties - Supreme Court reinstates admission, finding that such disputes were non-credible and did not justify withholding payment - Ledger accounts indicated amounts due, and payments confirmed a...
Sohail Malik VS Union Of India
Subject: Employment Law – Sexual Harassment
Keywords: Sexual Harassment, Jurisdiction, Internal Complaints Committee, POSH Act, Aggrieved Woman, Workplace Definition, Preliminary Inquiry, Disciplinary Action, Legal Rights, Statutory Interpretation
The jurisdiction of the Internal Complaints Committee under the POSH Act extends beyond the respondent's workplace, allowing for inquiries at the aggrieved woman's workplace, thus upholding the Act's ....
(A) Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 - Sections 2(f), 2(o), 9, 11, 13 and 19 - Jurisdiction of Internal Complaints Committee - The Appellant challenged the jurisdiction of the ICC constituted at the workplace of the aggrieved woman, arguing it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the complaint since he was employed in a different department. The...
Karshni Alloys Private Limited VS Ramakrishnan Sadasivan
Subject: Insolvency – Corporate Liquidation
Keywords: forfeiture, insolvency, NCLT, payment timelines, liquidation, appellate process, stakeholder decisions, financial recovery, good faith, expeditious resolution
Court confirmed the legitimacy of forfeiture of amounts paid during insolvency proceedings when payment timelines are not met, emphasizing the NCLT's authority to enforce such conditions to ensure exp....
(A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 62 - Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 - Private sale of corporate debtor's assets - The NCLT approved private sale of assets to the appellant; however, appellant failed to meet payment timelines, resulting in forfeiture of paid amounts - Claims of no loss to stakeholders were countered by financial recoveries that were unfulfilled. (Paras 4, ...
National Cooperative Development Corporation VS Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Subject: Tax Law – Income Tax
Keywords: deduction, income tax, long-term finance, derived from, statutory interpretation, appellate decision, financial corporation, non-qualifying income, legislative intent, business income
Income not directly related to long-term financing does not qualify for deduction under Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, requiring strict interpretation of 'derived from.'
(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 36(1)(viii) - Deductions for long-term finance - Appellant sought deductions for non-loan income streams including dividends and interest on short-term deposits - Court held these receipts do not qualify as 'profits derived from' long-term finance as defined by the Act due to lack of direct connection to core business activity. (Paras 1-34) (B) Legal Interpretati...
State of West Bengal VS Anil Kumar Dey
(1) Power to freeze bank account of accused person – Powers under Section 18A of PC Act and Section 102, Cr.P.C. are not mutually exclusive.
(2) Precedent – Courts ought not to be expected to follo....
(A) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Section 18A – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 102 – Power to freeze bank account of accused person – Powers under Section 18A of PC Act and Section 102, Cr.P.C. are not mutually exclusive – Power of seizure and attachment are separate and distinct, even if effect is same/similar which is, that property is taken into custody by authority, either inve...
Vineeta Srinandan VS High Court Of Judicature At Bombay On Its Own Motion
Subject: Contempt of Court – Criminal Contempt
Keywords: contempt, genuine remorse, judicial discretion, remit punishment, circular, scandalize, obstruction, High Court, apology, judicial authority
Judicial discretion to remit contempt punishment exists when genuine remorse is demonstrated by the contemnor, as outlined in Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act.
(A) Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Section 12 - Criminal contempt - Appellant held guilty of contempt due to a circular that scandalized the court and obstructed justice - Court must consider genuine remorse for potentially remitting punishment. (Paras 1, 4, 7-9) (B) Judicial Discretion - The exercise of judicial discretion to remit punishment is valid where genuine contrition is shown by the cont...
Mohan Lal Fatehpuria VS Bharat Textiles
Subject: Arbitration – Mandate and Substitution
Keywords: Arbitration, Sole Arbitrator, Mandate, Substitution, Extension, Administrative Expenses, Legal Provisions, High Court, Arbitration Act, Dispute Resolution
Court ruled that a sole arbitrator's mandate terminates upon the expiration of the designated time period, warranting appointment of a substitute under Section 29A(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliati....
(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 29A(6) - Extension of mandate - High Court erred in extending the mandate of sole arbitrator when it had ceased to exist; order granting extension is quashed - New arbitrator appointed to conclude proceedings within six months. (Paras 9-15) Facts of the case: Disputes arose under a partnership deed with an arbitration clause; sole arbitrator was...
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs ANIL KUMAR DEY
Subject: Criminal Law – Corruption
Keywords: freezing, corruption, accounts, law, attachment, investigation, CrPC, PC Act, proceedings, assets
The court ruled that powers of police to freeze accounts under CrPC are distinct from attachment provisions under the Prevention of Corruption Act, necessitating adherence to appropriate procedures fo....
(A) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13 and 18A - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 102 - Freezing of accounts - The court assessed whether the police could freeze accounts during investigation under CrPC in cases strictly under the PC Act, holding powers under Section 102 and Section 18A distinct and requiring adherence to their respective procedures - The freezing was deeme...
Suvej Singh VS Ram Naresh
Subject: Civil Law – Property Disputes
Keywords: revenue map, possession, correction, finality, jurisdiction, remand, settled ownership, litigation, legal interpretation, Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code
The Supreme Court affirmed that issues previously settled cannot be re-litigated under Section 30 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code unless substantial errors arise, thereby preventing unnecessary liti....
(A) Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 - Section 30 - Writ petition challenging order for correction of revenue map - High Court remanded matter for fresh consideration - Court found High Court erred in misinterpreting Section 30; matter concerning settled ownership should not be re-litigated - No fresh grounds were found to reconsider previous orders - (Paras 12-18) Facts of the case: Appellant con...
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. VS BCL Secure Premises Pvt. Ltd.
(1) Appointment of Arbitrator – Referral Court should be prima facie satisfied that there exists arbitration agreement and as to whether non-signatory is a veritable party.
(2) Mere legal or commer....
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 11(6) – Appointment of Arbitrator – Non-payment of dues – Dispute emanating from work contract – Referral Court should be prima facie satisfied that there exists arbitration agreement and as to whether non-signatory is a veritable party – Even if Referral Court prima facie arrives at satisfaction that non-signatory is a veritable party, Arbitral Tri...
Amal Kumar VS State of Jharkhand
Insult using caste name – When there is no allegation that casteist slur was made in a place within public view or that there was any member of public present at the spot, no offence is made out under....
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 – Sections 3(1)(g) and (s) – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 482 – Insult using caste name – Refusal to quash FIR – FIR based on FIS is a clear abuse of process of law – From records of suit as has been filed by first informant, allegations in FIS does not come out – As of now land is covered by a sale deed in favou...
Ashok Kumar Dabas (Dead through Legal Heirs) VS Delhi Transport Corporation
Subject: Employment Law – Pension and Gratuity
Keywords: resignation, forfeiture, gratuity, leave encashment, pension, entitlement, service, employee, legal heirs, central rules
Resignation forfeits past service; legal heirs entitled to gratuity and leave encashment after five years of service, but not entitled to pension under specified rules.
(A) Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 26 - Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Entitlement of deceased employee’s legal heirs for gratuity and leave encashment - Resignation resulting in forfeiture of past service does not bar claim to gratuity after five years of service. (Paras 9, 10) (B) Pension - Distinguished from gratuity - Resignation does not entitle employee to pension benef...
Surender Kumar VS State of Himachal Pradesh
Subject: Criminal Law – Murder
Keywords: conviction, murder, self-defense, provocation, knife blows, exceptions, cruelty, intent, appeal, reaffirmed
The court affirmed the conviction of an accused under Section 302 IPC, ruling no self-defense or mitigating circumstances were present, reinforcing that cruelty and intent to kill were evident in the ....
(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Conviction for murder affirmed - No evidence of self-defense or of provocation that would mitigate the offense - Act of inflicting four knife blows to an unarmed individual deemed cruel and indicative of intent to kill. (Paras 3, 5, 7, 10, 12) (B) Exceptions to Section 300 IPC - Court ruled that neither Exception 2 (exceeding self-defense) nor Exception ...
Sohanvir @ Sohanvir Dhama VS State Of U. P.
Assault and abuse in public view – Public view is an essential ingredient to constitute offence under Section 3(1) (s) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 – Sections 3(1) (s) and 14-A(1) – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 323 and 504 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 202 – Assault and abuse in public view – Summoning order – Alleged caste based abuses were uttered inside premises, in presence of Appellants and Respondent – Essential requirement of offence under Sect...
Salil Mahajan VS Avinash Kumar
Subject: Criminal Law – Bail
Keywords: anticipatory bail, embezzlement, custodial interrogation, non-application of mind, relevant facts, High Court, Supreme Court, gravity of offense, investigation, judicial reasoning
The process for granting anticipatory bail must reflect careful consideration of all relevant facts and the potential impact on the investigation.
(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 482 - Criminal Appeal - Anticipatory bail was granted by High Court to the accused for embezzling over Rs. 3 crores, however, the Supreme Court found the order suffered from non-application of mind regarding custodial interrogation, failing to consider the necessity for further investigation. (Paras 2, 6-12) (B) Bail - Legal principles - An ap...
AKOLA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. vs ZISHAN HUSSAIN AZHAR HUSSAIN AND ANR.
Subject: Public Law – Municipal Law
Keywords: property tax, municipal corporation, judicial review, economic policy, revenue generation, due process, public interest litigation, tax revision, legal authority, administrative autonomy
Judicial review in economic policy matters is limited; municipal authorities must have the flexibility to revise tax structures following statutory guidelines.
(A) Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Powers and duties of Municipal Corporation - Revision of property tax for 2017-22 challenged - The petitioner alleged illegal increase without due process - Court held that tax revision is necessary for revenue and duty of the Corporation; laxity in past leads to the need for increase - The High Court improperly interfered, failing to recognize the Corporation...
Dadu @ Ankush VS State Of Madhya Pradesh
Attempt to outrage modesty and hurt – Evidence of a hostile witness would not be totally rejected if spoken in favour of either prosecution or accused – It would rather have to be subjected to closer ....
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 – Section 3(1)(xi) – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 354 and 323 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 374(2) – Attempt to outrage modesty and hurt – Conviction and sentence – Evidence of a hostile witness would not be totally rejected if spoken in favour of either prosecution or accused – It would rather have to be ...
GOVIND MANDAVI vs STATE OF CHATTISGARH
Subject: Criminal Law – Homicide
Keywords: acquittal, murder, eyewitness, FIR omission, identification, forensic evidence, credibility, contradictions, testimony, prior enmity
The omission to name the accused in the FIR significantly undermines the prosecution's case, impacting witness credibility and necessitating the acquittal of the appellant.
(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302/34 and 460 - Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Acquittal of co-accused in murder trial - Appellant convicted based on witness testimony and forensic evidence - Conviction challenged on grounds of uncorroborated witness identification and prior enmity. (Paras 5, 20, 49) (B) Identification Evidence - Necessity for ...
Govind Mandavi VS State Of Chattisgarh
Murder and lurking house trespass – Omission of names of accused in FIR is fatal as it goes to very root of matter.
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302/34 and 460 – Murder and lurking house trespass – Common intention – Life imprisonment – Two star prosecution witnesses have attempted to modulate and improve their versions while deposing on oath – Their testimonies are full of embellishments and contradictions – Omission of names of accused in FIR is fatal as it goes to very root of matter – Said omission co...
Akola Municipal Corporation VS Zishan Hussain Azhar Hussain
Subject: Public Interest Litigation – Taxation
Keywords: property tax, judicial review, municipal corporations, public interest, due process, economic policy, locus standi, statutory authority, tax revision, legal compliance
Judicial review of economic policy decisions by municipal corporations is limited to procedural legality; substantive authority to revise municipal taxes is not subject to judicial re-evaluation unles....
(A) Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Property tax revision - The Akola Municipal Corporation's revision of property tax rates for 2017-2018 to 2021-2022 challenged for legality and due process compliance. Court emphasized need for regular revision of municipal taxes to ensure financial stability and effective public services. (Paras 3, 6, 24) (B) Public Interest Litigation - Locus st...
SHINE VARGHESE KOIPURATHU vs STATE OF KERALA & ANR.
Subject: Criminal Law – Negotiable Instruments Act
Keywords: cash transaction, legally enforceable, acquitted, penalty, remitted, appeal, section 138, Income Tax Act, High Court, jurisdiction
Violation of Section 269SS of the IT Act does not render a transaction under Section 138 NI Act unenforceable.
In this judgment, the appellant challenged the High Court's ruling acquitting the respondent of charges under Section 138 of the NI Act. The trial court found the respondent guilty as per NI Act, which was overturned based on alleged cash transaction violations under Section 269SS of the IT Act. The court clarified such violations do not make transactions illegal or unenforceable under NI Act. Res...
Victim's Elopement, No Medical Corroboration Bars Rape Conviction Under Sections 376 IPC, 6 POCSO: Karnataka High Court
18 Feb 2026
Approach Statutory Authorities First Before Invoking Article 32 for Ganga Sewage Issue: Supreme Court
18 Feb 2026
Degrees Obtained Before Ultra Vires Act Struck Down Remain Valid for Employment: Supreme Court
18 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Flags Bad Message in Yadav Snake Case
18 Feb 2026
FIR Under Repealed Foreigners Act, 1946 Quashed for Post-2025 Violation: MP High Court
18 Feb 2026
Homeopathy Practitioners Can't Prescribe Allopathy Meds: Telangana HC Quashes Proceedings for Non-Compliance with Section 54 NMCA
18 Feb 2026
Transport & Infrastructure Issues Cannot Justify Absence from Duty: J&K&L HC Upholds Termination of Contractual NHM Worker
18 Feb 2026
Hasin Jahan Seeks Supreme Court Transfer of Shami Cases to Delhi
18 Feb 2026
Bombay HC Demands Mallya's Return for FEO Challenge
18 Feb 2026
Delhi High Court Directs BCD to Protect Lawyers' Privacy
18 Feb 2026
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.