Suvej Singh vs Ram Naresh - 2025 Supreme(SC) 2021

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(SC) 2021

RAJESH BINDAL, MANMOHAN
Suvej Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Naresh – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Surendra Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shrey Kapoor, AOR Mr. Tarun Khanna, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. S. R. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sushant Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Prateek Yadav, Adv. Mr. Mangal Prasad, Adv. Mrs. Sunita Pandit, Adv. Mr. Prithvi Yadav, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Lomes, Adv. Mr. Anurag Singh, Adv. Ms. Radha Rajput, Adv. Mr. Ankur Yadav, AOR

Table of Content
1. leave granted for appeal. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual background of possession disputes. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments regarding remand and correction. (Para 5 , 6 , 11)
4. court's interpretation of section 30. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. high court's order not legally sustainable. (Para 15)
6. court's view on unnecessary remands. (Para 16 , 17)
7. appeal allowed; high court's order set aside. (Para 18)

JUDGMENT :

Rajesh Bindal, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant aggrieved against the impugned order¹[Writ C No.28878 of 2023] dated 21.09.2023 passed by the High Court²[High Court of Judicature at Allahabad]. The challenge before the High Court was to the order dated 25.04.2023 passed by the respondent No.5³[Additional Commissioner (Administration), Bareilly Division, Pilibhit] and the order dated 15.01.2020 passed by respondent No.4⁴[Additional Collector (Judicial), Bareilly Division, Pilibhit]. Vide impugned order, the High Court while setting aside the aforesaid orders had remanded the case to the respondent No.4 for consideration afresh after giving due opportunity of hearing to the concerned parties.

3. Briefly, the facts of the case, as availa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document