SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 118

G.L.OZA, K.N.SAIKIA
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Hariharprasaddebuka – Respondent


Advocates:
G.RAMASVAMY, RANJIT GHOSAL

JUDGMENT

K. N. SAIKIA, J.:— These appeals by special leave are from a Full Bench judgment of the Patna High Court* in two writ petitions under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India allowing the petitions and quashing the Bihar Governments Notification No. S.O. 1432 dated 28th December 1985 as violative of Arts. 301 and 304 of the Constitution of India.

* Reported in AIR 1987 Pat 175 (FB).

2. Sub-section (2-A) of S. 31 of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 was substituted by Bihar Finance Act, 1984 as follows :-

"(2-a) A person transporting goods shall carry a declaration in such form as may be prescribed by the commissioner supported by either a cash memo, bill or a challan, in case the movement is otherwise than as a result of sale, in respect of goods which is being transported on a goods carrier, or a vessel and shall produce such challan, cash memo or bill along with the aforesaid form of declaration on demand before the prescribed authority :

Provided that the Commissioner, by notification in this respect, may prescribe a for of declaration or adopt a form of declaration or permit prescribed for the purpose of Ss. 34 and 35 of this part, and, he may also prescribe, in the said n






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top