M.FATHIMA BEEVI, S.R.PANDIAN, K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY
Mohan Kumar Singhania: Mahesh D. Pathak: Nitin D. Wakankar: Navneet Goel: S. Venkateswar: Dinesh Kumar Singh: Rohit Choudhary: Anil Kant: R. Manjunathaswamy: Arun Kumar Ray – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgment
S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN, J.- The above batch of Civil Appeals in which common questions of law arise, is preferred, by special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution of India against the judgments dated 20-8-1990, 4-10-1990.and 5-10-1990 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal) rendered in various affiliated groups of original applications (O.As) upholding the validity of the second proviso to Rule 4 of the Civil Services Examination Rules (hereinafter referred to as C.S.E. Rules) introduced by Notification Number 13016/4/86-AIS(I) dated 13-12-1986 (Published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary, Part I Section 1). Be it noted that similar notification has been/is being issued each year for the general information of the candidates setting down the terms and conditions, eligibility etc. to sit for the Civil Service Examination of the concerned year.
2. While a substantial number of O.As filed before the Tribunal at Delhi were pending, a similar number of analogous O.As filed before the Benches of Administrative Tribunals at Patna, Allahabad, Chandigarh, Jabalpur, Hyderabad, Jodhpur and Eranakulam were transfer
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education v. Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Sheth
Philips India Ltd. v. Labour court, Madras
Balasinor Nagrik Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Babubhai Shankerlal Pandya
Dr Ajay Pradhan v. State of M.P.
Lila Dhar v. State of Rajasthan
referred to : Ram Narain Sons Ltd. v. Assistant CST
decided on : R.K. Dalmia v. Justice S.R. Tendulkar
Budhan Choudhry v. State of Bihar
Kumari Chitra Ghosh v. Union of India
State of J and K v. Triloki Nath Khosa
A.S. Sangwan v. Union of India
Deepak Sibal v. Punjab University
Chiranjit Lal Chowdhuri v. Union of India
Kasturi Lal Lakshmi Reddy v. State of J and K
Ameerunissa Begum v. Mahboob Begum
Gopi Chand v. Delhi Administration
T. Devadasan v. Union of India
relied on : C.A. Rajendran v. Union of India
Akhil Bharatiya Soshit Karamchari Sangh (Railway) v. Union of India
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel
Swadeshi Cotton Mills v. Union of India
Central-Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. v. Brojo Nath Ganguly
C.A. Rajendran v. Union of India
State of Kerala v. N. M. Thomas
Akhil Bharatiya Soshit Karamchari Sangh (Railway) v. Union of India
Janki Prasad Parimoo v. State of J and K
M.R. Balaji v. State of Mysore
Triloki Nath v. State of J and K
T. Devadasan v. Union of India
Comptroller and Auditor-General of India v. K.S. Jagannathan
Ram Narain Sons Ltd. v. Assistant CST
Abdul Jabar Butt v. State of J and K
Commissioner of Income Tax v. S. Teja Singh
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Indo Mercantile Bank Ltd.
Mackinnon Mackenzie and Co.Ltd. v. Audrey DCosta
Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Escorts Ltd.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. S. Teja Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.