SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.P. JEEVAN REDDY AND S.P. BHARUCHA, JJ.
Rajasthan Roller Flour Mills Association and another Appellants
Versus
State of Rajasthan and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 3922-25 of 1991 with C.A. Nos. 4749-4801, 5082-84 and 5014 of 1991 and 1291-98 of 1990, I.A. Nos.3 and 4 of 1993, S.L.P. (C) Nos. 185 and 8275 of 1992, D/- 1-9-1993.
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 286 and 286 - Central Sales Tax Act - Section 16, 14 and 15 - Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Madras General Sales Tax (Turnover and Assessment) Rules, 1939 - Rule 18 - Madras General Sales Tax Act - Sale of goods - Levy tax - Scheme of our Constitution power to levy tax on sale of goods is vested in States by entry 54 in List II of the VII th Schedule but this power is subject to limitations contained in Art. 286. Art. 286, before its amendment by Constitution Sixth (Amendment) Act, 1956, declared that State Legislature shall not be competent to levy tax on inter-State sales, sales in course of import and export (into or from India) and on sale of declared goods - After said amendment, prohibition with respect to inter-State sales and sales effected in course of import/export remains though framed differently - Learned counsel for the dealers put their case in following fashion- Wheat is staple food of a majority of population of this country - Wheat is not consumed as such - It has to be ground/milled into flour before it is consumed - For certain purposes, wheat is milled into maida or suji, as case may be - Flour, maida and suji are not commodities different from wheat - Even after being milled, they remain and continue to be wheat - They are merely different forms of wheat - Held, Learned counsel for the dealers repeatedly emphasised that flour, maida and suji are commodities of daily use a by large segment of population of this country and that our opinion may add to burden on common man - This submission would have carried some force if all High Courts in country had taken one uniform view and Court proposed to upset it - As Court shall presently point out, there is no such unanimity, nor can it be said that decisions holding in favour of the dealers have held the field for a long time - The Rajasthan High Court has held that flour, maida and suji being goods different from wheat are not declared goods - Patna High Court too, there does not appear to be any decision on the question until the one now under appeal, which was rendered - Patna High Court has taken view that they are same goods - In fact, this decision was referred with approval by Karnataka High Court but was dissented from by Rajasthan High Court - Court have been informed that recently Madras High Court has taken the same view as Andhra Pradesh High Court and that a Special Leave Petition has been filed against it in this Court - It is obvious that if Parliament proposes to treat flour, maida and suji also as declared goods, it can always say so by effecting necessary amendments - Order accordingly.
Judgment
B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, J. - A difference of opinion has arisen among the High Courts in the country over the question whether the expression wheat in S. 14(i)(iii) of Central Sales Tax Act (Act) includes flour, maida and suji. Karnataka and Patna High Courts have held that it does so include, while Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan and - we are told - Madras High Courts have taken a contrary view.
2. S. 14 occurs in Chapter IV which carries the heading "Goods of special importance in Inter-State Trade or Commerce." S. 14 declares certain goods to be of special importance in inter-State trade and commerce, hereinafter referred to as "declared goods". The first clause, introduced in 1976** is cereals. As many as ten commodities are mentioned under Cl. (i) which reads as follows :
"Section 14. Certain goods to be of special importance in inter-State trade or commerce.- It is hereby declared that the following goods are of special importance in inter-State or commerce:-
[(i) Cereals, that is to say,-
(i) Paddy (Oryza Sativa L.);
(ii) Rice (Oryza Sativa L.):
(iii) Wheat (Triticum Vulgare, T. compactum, T. sphaerococcum, T. durum, T. aestivum L., T. dicoccum);
(iv) Jowar or milo (Sorghum vulgare Pers);
(v) Bajra (Pennisetum typhoideum L.);
(vi) Maize (Zea mys L.);
(vii) Ragi (Eleusine coracana Gaertn);
(viii) Kodon (Paspalum scrobiculatum;
(ix) Kutki (Panicum miliare L.);
(x) Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.):]"
(**the then existing Cl. (i) was renumbered as Cl. (ii).)
3. S. 15 imposes certain restrictions upon, and conditions in regard to the imposition of tax on sale or purchase of declared goods by a State Legislature. It says that "every Sales Tax Law of a State shall, in so far as it imposes or authorises the imposition of a tax on the sale or purchase of declared goods be subject to the following restrictions and conditions......." S. 15 specifies four restrictions/ conditions. They are: (a) the tax on declared goods shall not exceed 4 per cent and the tax shall not be levied at more than one stage; (b) where a tax has been levied on an intra-State sale and such goods are later sold in the course of inter-State trade or commerce, the tax levied on intra-State sale shall be reimbursed to the person effecting the interState sale; (c) if a tax has been levied on the sale or purchase of paddy. and the rice derived from such paddy is sold later, the tax on sale of rice shall be reduced by the amount of tax paid on paddy; and (d) the pulses referred to in Cl. (vi)(a) of S. l4 shall mean and include pulses whole or separated, and pulses whether with or without husk.
4. Cl. (i) (cereals), Cl. (vi)(a) (oilseeds) in S. 14 and Cls. (c) and (d) in S. 15, it may be noted, were inserted by Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act 103 of 1976, with effect from September 7, 1976.
5. Under the scheme of our Constitution the power to levy tax on the sale of goods is vested in the States by entry 54 in List II of the VII th Schedule but this power is subject to the limitations contained in Art. 286. Art. 286, before its amendment by the Constitution Sixth (Amendment) Act, 1956, declared that the State Legislature shall not be competent to levy tax on inter-State sales, sales in the course of import and export (into or from India) and on the sale of declared goods. After the said amendment, the prohibition with respect to inter-State sales and sales effected in the course of import/export remains though framed differently. However, so far as the declared goods are concerned, the absolute prohibition has given way to restrictions and conditions as may be imposed by Parliament by law. Cl. (3) of Art. 286, which is immediately relevant for our purpose, and reads as follows before and after the VIth Amendment Act :
Before the Sixth Amendment Act After the Sixth Amendment Act (w.e.f. 11-9-1956)
(3) No law made by the Legislature of a State imposing, or authorising the imposition of, a tax on the sale or purchase of any such goods as have been declared by Parliament by law to be essent
applied : Ganesh Trading Co. v. State of Haryana
Babu Ram Jagdish Kumar and Co. v. State of Punjab
State of Karnataka v. Raghurama Shetty
followed : State of T.N. v. Pyare Lal Malhotra
applied : J.K. Jute Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of U.P.
relied on : Chowringhee Sales Bureau (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Ishwari Khetan Sugar Mills (P) Ltd. v. State of U.P.
approved : Udata Narasimha Rao and Co. v. State of A.P.
applied : Alladi Venkateswarlu v. government of A.P.
Tungabhadra Industries Ltd., Kurnool v. Commercial Tax Officer, Kurnool
Deputy CST (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes) v. Pio Food Packers
State of Gujarat v. Sakarwala Brothers
Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. v. State of Kerala
distinguished : State of T.N. v. Mahi Traders
State of A.P. v. V. Venkata Subbaiah and Sons
relied on : Devi Pass Gopal Krishnan v. State of Punjab
Hindustan Aluminum Corporation Ltd. v. State of U.P.
referred to : Porritts and Spencer (Asia) Ltd. v. State of Haryana
Rajasthan Roller Flour Mills Assn. v. State of Rajasthan
affirmed : Tirupati Flour Mills v. State of A.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.