(JAIPUR BENCH)
M R Calla, Mahendra Bhushan Sharma JJ.
RAJASTHAN ROLLER FLOUR MILLS ASSOCIATION
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANOTHER. (AND OTHER CASES).
(Special leave against this judgment was granted to the dealer by the Supreme Court on 24th September, 1991 in S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 14693 - 14696 of 1991 : See [1991] 83 STC Frsc 12, Sl. No. 42.) D.B. Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 4633, 4634 and 4636 of 1990 and 1614, 1646 and 1647 of 1991
Decided On: Decided On : 13-08-1991
SALES TAX - DECLARED GOODS - FLOUR, FINE-FLOUR (ATTA, MAIDA AND SUJI) - WHETHER INCLUDED IN THE TERM "WHEAT" AS USED IN CLAUSE (I)(III) OF SECTION 14 OF THE CENTRAL SALES TAX ACT, 1956 - RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED UNDER SECTION 15 OF THE ACT - WHETHER APPLICABLE - NOTIFICATION DATED JUNE 27, 1990 - WHETHER CONTRAVENE THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 14 AND 15 OF THE ACT.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, who are flour mill owners, challenged the notification dated June 27, 1990, issued by the State Government, which imposed sales tax on flour, fine-flour (atta, maida and suji). The petitioners contended that flour and fine-flour are forms of wheat and therefore they are declared goods under section 14(i)(iii) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (CST Act) and are subject to restrictions and conditions in respect of tax on sale or purchase as prescribed in section 15 of the CST Act. The Revenue contended that the notification does not contravene the provisions of sections 14 and 15 of the CST Act as flour and fine-flour are not included in the term "wheat" as used in clause (i)(iii) of section 14 of the CST Act.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that flour, fine-flour (atta, maida and suji) are not included in the term "wheat" as used in clause (i)(iii) of section 14 of the CST Act and the restrictions imposed under section 15 of the CST Act do not apply. The Court further held that the notification dated June 27, 1990, cannot be said to contravene the provisions of sections 14 and 15 of the CST Act.
Issues: Whether flour and fine-flour (atta, maida and suji) are included in the term "wheat" as used in clause (i)(iii) of section 14 of the CST Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court interpreted the term "wheat" in clause (i)(iii) of section 14 of the CST Act in its ordinary and natural meaning and held that it does not include flour and fine-flour (atta, maida and suji). The Court also considered the legislative history of the CST Act and the fact that the Legislature had used the words "in all its forms" in other clauses of section 14 to indicate that it intended to include all forms of a particular commodity. The Court concluded that the Legislature's omission of the words "in all its forms" after the word "wheat" in clause (i)(iii) was deliberate and indicated that it did not intend to include flour and fine-flour in the term "wheat".
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the writ petitions filed by the petitioners, upholding the validity of the notification dated June 27, 1990.
M. B. SHARMA, J. - In the above numbered writ petitions an identical question is involved and therefore, all the above writ petitions are being disposed of by this common order.
2. The petitioner in each of the above writ petitions purchases wheat from outside State as well as from within the State of Rajasthan for crushing it into flour and fine-flour, i.e., maida and suji and sells it to the traders within and without the State.
3. Clause 3 of article 286 of the Constitution lays down that any law of a State shall in so far as it imposes or authorises the imposition of a tax on the sale or purchase of goods declared by Parliament by law to be of special importance in inter-State trade or commerce, or a tax on the sale or purchase of goods being a tax of the nature referred to in sub-clause (b) or sub-clause (c) or sub-clause (d) of clause (29A) of article 366, be subject to such restrictions and conditions in regard to the system of levy, rates and other incidents of the tax as Parliament may by law specify. In view of the aforesaid constitutional mandate provisions were made in the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (for short, "the CST Act"). Section 2(c) of the CST Act defines "declared goods" and the said term means goods declared under section 14 to be of special importance in inter-State trade or commerce. Section 14 of the CST Act declares certain goods to be of special importance in inter-State trade or commerce, and for the convenience these goods have come to be known as "declared goods". A conjoint reading of sections 14 and 15 of the CST Act will show that so far as declaration of goods under section 14 is concerned, the sales tax law of the State shall impose or authorise imposition of tax not exceeding 4 per cent of the sale or purchase price thereof and such tax shall not be levied at more than one stage. So far as clause (i) of section 14 of the CST Act is concerned, it reads as under :
"Section 14 : Certain goods to be of special importance in inter-State trade or commerce. - It is hereby declared that the following goods are of special importance in inter-State trade or commerce -
(i) cereals, that is to say -
(i) paddy (Oryza sativa L.);
(ii) rice (Oryza sativa L.);
(iii) wheat (Triticum vulgare, T. compactum, T. sphaerococcum, T. durum, T. aestivum L., T. dicoccum);
(iv) jowar or milo (Sorghum vulgare Pers);
(v) bajra (Pennisetum typhoideum L.);
(vi) maize (Zea mays D.);
(vii) ragi (Eleusine coracana Gaertn.);
(viii) kodon (paspalum scrobiculatum L.);
(ix) kutki (panicum miliare L.);
(x) barley (Hordeum vulgare L.);"
It will therefore appear from the aforesaid extracted clause (i) that "wheat" is declared goods.
4. In the seventies wheat was exempted from payment of sales tax by various notifications issued under section 4(2) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 (for short, "the RST Act"). Under the various notifications the State Government in exercise of the powers conferred by proviso ii to section 5 of the RST Act prescribed the rates of sales tax payable by a dealer in respect of goods including flour, fine-flour, i.e., maida, and suji and a reference may be made to the following notifications in this respect -
Notification number and date Rate of tax
1. F.5.(23)E&T/61-I dated March 9, 1961 1%
2. 5(A) : F.5(40)FD(R&T)/63 XIII dated March 2, 1963 2%
3. S. No. 94 : F.5(125)FD(CT)/65-IV dated November 2, 1965 1%
4. S. No. 248 : F.5(24)FD/CT/72-8 dated April 26, 1972 1%
5. F.4(67)FD/Gr.IV/76-23 dated September 8, 1976 3%
6. F.4(5)FD/Gr.IV/88-13 dated March 8, 1988 :
for paddy, rice and wheat 4%
for maida, suji and sewaiyan 5%
7. F.4(4)FD/Gr.IV/89-12 dated March 23, 1989 4%
5. The case of the petitioners is that in the pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.