SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 586

S. P. BHARUCHA, A. M. AHMADI, K. S. PARIPOORNAN
State Of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Mahanadi Coalfields LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.GANGULY, Altaf Ahmed, ANAND PRASAD, ARVIND SHARMA, ASHOK PANJA, B.SEN, C.MUKHOPADHAYA, D.MANDAL, DHRUV AGARWAL, G.K.MISHRA, GAURAV BANERJEE, GAURAV KUMAR, HEMANTIKA VATII, IRSHAD AHMAD, K.K.LAHRI, K.K.VENUGOPAL, K.P.SINGH, K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, KAPIL SIBAL, KITTY KUMARAMANGALAM, KRISHAN MAHAJAN, M.K.BANERJI, MANAS CHAKRAVARTY, MONA CHAKRAVARTY, N.S.HEGDE, P.D.TYAGI, P.N.Gupta, P.S.NARASIMHA, R.F.NARIMAN, R.K.MEHTA, RAJ GUPTA, Rajesh Agarwal, Rakesh K.Khanna, RAVINDRA CHAUDHARY, S.C.ROY, S.K.BHATTACHARJEE, S.P.SINGH, S.SUKUMARAN, SANJAY DAS, SANJIT MOHANTY, SHANTI BHUSHAN, SOM MANDAL, U.A.RAMA, V.A.BOBDE, V.G.PRAGASAM, V.R.REDDY, VIJAY LAKSHMI MENON, VINU BHAGAT

JUDGMENT

PARIPOORNAN, J. :—The State of Orissa and the authorities in the Mines Department of the State are the appellants in this batch of appeals. M/s. Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd., a Government company, in whom the lands in question vests in accordance with Section 11 of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 (Central Act 20 of 1957), and Union of India are the respondents in the main appeal. In the other appeals, the consumers of coal who purchase coal from Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. for their own consumption as well as some traders in Coal are the respondents. The Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd., the consumers of coal who purchase coal from Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd., and some traders in coal assailed the validity of the Orissa Rural Employment, Education and Production Act, 1992 (Orissa Act 36 of 1992), as amended, hereinafter referred to as the Act, before the High Court of orissa in a series of writ petitions. The main controversy in the cases was regarding the levy of tax under the Act on "coal bearing lands". By a common Judgment dated 26-4-1994* the Division Bench of the High Court held that the State Legislature did not have the competence to levy the tax on co












































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top