SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 841

SWATANTER KUMAR, S. H. KAPADIA
Glanrock Estate (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. H. Kapadia, CJI

Some doctrines die hard. That certainly is true of the doctrine of basic structure of the Constitution.

2. Against this backdrop, we need to examine the constitutional validity of the Constitution (Thirty- fourth Amendment) Act, 1974. By the said Amendment Act, the Gudalur Janmam Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1969 [for short “the Janmam Act (Act 24 of 1969)”] stood inserted in the Ninth Schedule to the Constitution as Item No. 80.

Facts

3. In 1961, the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961 [for short “the 1961 Act”] was enacted. However, by virtue of Section 73(v), the said Act was made inapplicable to Hill Areas. On 6.12.1969, the Janmam Act (Act 24 of 1969) was enacted but not notified till 27.11.1974. The Janmam Act (Act 24 of 1969) was enacted inter alia to provide for acquisition of the rights of janmis in Janmam estates in the Gudalur taluk of the Nilgiris district and for the introduction of ryotwari settlement in such estates. On 26.10.1970, the Madras High Court dismissed nine writ petitions filed by the janmis challenging the constitutional validity of the Janmam Act (Act 24 of 1969). By a judg






























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top