ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, G.S.SINGHVI
Delhi Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
S. S. Aggarwal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
G.S. Singhvi, J. —
1. Leave granted in SLP(C) Nos. 18056-18057 of 2003.
2. These appeals are directed against judgment dated 21.2.2003 of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court whereby the appeals preferred by two groups of persons i.e., S.S. Aggarwal and others and Om Prakash and others under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, “the Act”) were allowed and market value of the acquired land fixed by Additional District Judge, Delhi (hereinafter described as, `the Reference Court’) was enhanced from Rs.102/- to Rs.7,390/- per square yard.
3. By notification dated 6.1.1995 issued under Section 4(1) read with Section 17(1) of the Act, the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi proposed the acquisition of 27 bighas 5 biswas land situated at village Jasola. After 4 days, the declaration was issued under Section 6 of the Act.
4. In response to the notice issued under Section 9 of the Act, the landowners filed three claim petitions through the same Advocate, namely, Ch. Sawrup Singh. One of the petitions was filed by Kishan Lal and 13 others. The other was filed by S.K. Sarogi and another and the third was filed by Mangla Ram and 3 others. The
Murlidhar Dayandeo Kesekar v. Vishwanath Pandu Barde (1995) Supp. 2 SCC 549
Jayamma v. Maria Bai (2004) 7 SCC 459
Central Inland Water Transport Corporation v. Brojo Nath Ganguly (1986) 3 SCC 156
Buta Singh v. Union of India (1995) 5 SCC 284
Rattan Chand Hira Chand v. Askar Nawaz Jung (1991) 3 SCC 67
Sunrise Associates v. Government of NCT of Delhi (2006) 5 SCC 603
Delhi Development Authority v. Bhola Nath Sharma (2011) 2 SCC 54
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.