SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HEMANT GUPTA
State of Uttar Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HEMANT GUPTA, J.
1. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench at Lucknow on 05.03.2020, affirming the order passed by the learned Single Bench on 07.08.2019. Vide the aforesaid orders, the appellants were directed to calculate and pay 50% of the back wages to the respondent, hereinafter referred to as writ petitioner, and to grant all the consequential benefits in accordance with law.
2. The writ petitioner was posted in State of Uttaranchal (for short ‘Government of Uttaranchal’ now Uttarakhand, hereinafter referred to as Uttarakhand) as a Medical Officer before the reorganization of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The writ petitioner was transferred to State of Uttar Pradesh as per the option given by Medical Officers of State of Uttar Pradesh including the writ petitioner. As many as 208 Medical Officers and 5 Dental doctors of Class-2 Category belonging to the U.P. Provincial Medical and Health Services (Male Cadre) were posted in the State of Uttar Pradesh on 6.3.2002. The name of the writ petitioner appears at Serial No. 99 of the said list of Medical Officers. The writ petitioner was to r
State of U.P. & Ors. v. Jasvir Singh & Ors.
R.S. Singh v. U.P. Malaria Nirikshank Sangh & Ors.
Divisional Manager, Aravali Golf Club & Anr. v. Chander Hass & Anr.
(1) Grant of 50% of back wages for entire period would be giving benefit of one’s own wrong who intentionally abstained from duty for 13 long years and now wants to take benefit of back wages as well....
Awaiting posting orders must comply with transfer bans and require proper justification and permissions to be valid.
The obligation of the state to release the petitioner's salary and the need for complete justice under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The principle of acquiescence and delay in seeking judicial redress, especially in policy matters affecting a class of persons, was established by the court.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of being vigilant in seeking judicial redress, the impact of waiver and acquiescence on the relief sought by the petitioners, and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the transfer of a government employee should be made in public interest and for administrative reasons, and frequent transfers without justifi....
The employer's prerogative to allocate duties can be subject to court intervention in the interest of patient care and fair treatment of employees.
The court emphasized that transfer orders made in public interest and for administrative reasons should not be interfered with unless they violate any mandatory statutory rule or are made on the grou....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.