SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1596

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, A. S. BOPANNA, J. B. PARDIWALA
S. Hymavathi – Appellant
Versus
National Testing Agency – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Shoeb Alam, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Sumanth Nookala, Advocate, Mr. G. Arudhra Rao, Advocate, Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Shashank Singh, Advocate, Mohd Asad Khan, Advocate, Mr Anupam Chaudhary, Advocate, Ms Yogyta Jhunjhunwala, Advocate, Mr Ujjaval Sinha, Advocate, Mr Ashish Kumar Sinha, Advocate, Mr. Satwik Parikh, Advocate, Ms. Vanshaja Shukla, Advocate, Mr. Rishad Murtaza, Advocate, Mr. Sajal Singhai, Advocate, For the Appellant / Mr. Sonal Jain, Advocate, Mr. Arjun Mitra, Advocate, Mr. Ishkaran Singh, Advocate, Ms. Kajal Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate, Ms. Neelam Sharma, Advocate, Ms. Pankhuri Shrivasta, Advocate, Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, (applicants) Mr. R.C. Mishra, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Ilin Saraswat, Advocate, Ms. Rohini Wagh, Advocate, Mr. Ananya Mishra, Advocate, Mr. Mahendra Kumar, Advocate, Ms. Ilma Saifi, Advocate, For Rajnish Kumar Jha, Advocate, For the Respondent.

ORDER

SLP (C) No(s).14546/2022

1. Mr C U Singh, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, seeks the permission of the Court to withdraw the Special Leave Petition in order to move the Division Bench of the High Court in appeal against the judgment of the Single Judge.

2. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

W.P.(C) No. 661/2022 and W.P.(C) No. 669/2022

1. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seek the permission of the Court to withdraw the petitions with liberty to approach the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.

2. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

IA Nos 122566. 122567. 122568. 122928. 122930. 122931. 122937. 122942 and 122947 of 2022

1. Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants seek the permission of the Court to withdraw the applications with liberty to approach the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.

2. The applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

W.P.(C) No. 687/2022

1. The petitioner has admittedly appeared and failed twice in the JEE (Advanced). The petition raises an issue of policy.

2. Hence, we are not inclined to entertain the petition under Ar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top