Back
J. K. MAHESHWARI
Managing Director, Sikkim Power Development Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Senior Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Learned Counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this Revision Petition with a liberty to file a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
He further prays that the certified copy of the impugned order may be returned back to him.
Learned Counsel representing the other side has no objection.
Considering the aforesaid this Revision Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order to the petitioner on filing the photocopy thereof within a week.
Petitioner is at liberty to take recourse as per law.
Accordingly, CRP No.04/2020 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
A petition may be withdrawn with permission if there is no objection from the opposing party and the applicant may pursue further recourse under Article 227 of the Constitution.
A plaintiff's right to withdraw a suit at the appellate stage is not absolute and must respect the rights acquired by the defendants under a decree.
Petitioner allowed to withdraw writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Party may withdraw a petition with the liberty to file afresh, aligning with procedural rules.
Permission to withdraw a civil revision petition is at the discretion of the court, confirming procedural authority.
Withdrawal of revision petitions can be permitted and results in dismissal without further findings.
The court has the discretion to grant permission for the withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to approach the High Court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
