SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1450

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Uday Umesh Lalit, Ajay Rastogi, JJ.
Vishal Vijay Kalantri – Appellant
Versus
Shailen Shah (resolution Professional of Dighi Port Limited) & Ors. – Respondents
Review Petition No. 569 of 2022 in Civil Appeal No. 2228 of 2021
Decided On : 04-05-2022

The court's decision was based on the satisfaction that the facts and circumstances on record did not call for any interference and that the Review Petition did not make out any case for the exercise of their jurisdiction in review.

Headnote:

Review Petition - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The court rejected the application for listing of the Review Petition in open court and dismissed the statutory appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 after being satisfied that the facts and circumstances on record did not call for any interference. The Review Petition preferred by a Power of Attorney holder of the original appellant was also dismissed after the court found that it did not make out any case for the exercise of their jurisdiction in review.

Fact of the Case:

The court rejected the application for listing of the Review Petition in open court and dismissed the statutory appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 after being satisfied that the facts and circumstances on record did not call for any interference. The Review Petition preferred by a Power of Attorney holder of the original appellant was also dismissed after the court found that it did not make out any case for the exercise of their jurisdiction in review.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the facts and circumstances on record did not call for any interference and that the Review Petition did not make out any case for the exercise of their jurisdiction in review.

Issues: Application for listing of Review Petition, Dismissal of statutory appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Review Petition by Power of Attorney holder

Ratio Decidendi: The court was satisfied that the facts and circumstances on record did not call for any interference and that the Review Petition did not make out any case for the exercise of their jurisdiction in review.

Final Decision: The court rejected the application for listing of the Review Petition in open court and dismissed the statutory appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Review Petition preferred by a Power of Attorney holder of the original appellant was also dismissed.

ORDER

1. Application for listing of Review Petition in open Court is rejected.

2. The statutory appeal preferred under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was dismissed by this Court after being satisfied that the facts and circumstances on record, especially paragraphs 9, 10 and 17 of the judgment under appeal, did not call for any interference.

3. The instant Review Petition is now preferred by a Power of Attorney holder of the original appellant.

4. We have gone through the contents of the Review Petition, which do not make out any case for exercise of our jurisdiction in review. This Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top