SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1515

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.
Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal – Appellant
Versus
Vasant D. Salunkhe & Ors. – Respondents
Conmt.Pet.(C) No. 309 of 2022 in C.A. No. 7478 of 2019
Decided On : 20-05-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal, Advocate, in-person, Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate, For the Appellant / Ms. Radhika Gautam, Advocate, For the Respondent.

The duty of Bar Councils to uphold professional conduct and etiquette, and the requirement for efficient and expeditious disposal of complaints under the Advocates Act.

Headnote:

Contempt Petition - Noncompliance of Court Directions - Advocates Act - Section 35, 36B - The judgment discusses the noncompliance of directions issued by the Court in a previous judgment related to the expeditious disposal of complaints by the Bar Council of India and State Bar Councils under Sections 35 and 36B of the Advocates Act. The Court emphasizes the duty of Bar Councils to uphold professional conduct and etiquette, and issues directions for efficient disposal of complaints, including the appointment of experienced advocates and retired judicial officers as Inquiry Officers.

Fact of the Case:

The Court granted permission to file a Contempt Petition regarding noncompliance of its directions by the Bar Council of India and State Bar Councils in expeditiously disposing of complaints under the Advocates Act.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the Bar Council of India had issued a circular to the State Bar Councils but emphasized that mere issuance of the circular was not enough, and required a detailed report on the compliance of the Court's directions to be filed by a specified date.

Issues: Noncompliance of Court Directions by Bar Council of India and State Bar Councils in disposal of complaints under the Advocates Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The duty of Bar Councils to uphold professional conduct and etiquette, the need for efficient disposal of complaints, and the requirement for a detailed report on compliance with Court directions.

Final Decision: Permission to file Contempt Petition granted, and the Bar Council of India directed to file a detailed report on compliance of Court directions by a specified date.

ORDER

1. Permission to file the Contempt Petition is granted.

2. A grievance which is voiced in the present petition is noncompliance of the directions issued by this Court in our earlier judgment and order dated 17.12.2021 in C.A. No. 7478 of 2019 [ K. Anjinappa vs. K.C. Krishna Reddy and Anr.]. The directions issued by this Court are as under:-

    "12. Therefore, we direct the Bar Council of India to finally dispose of the transferred complaints, the particulars of which are referred to hereinabove expeditiously but not later than one year from today and for which even the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India may hold circuit hearings.

    12.1 We also direct the respective State Bar Councils to decide and dispose of the complaint(s) received by it under Section 35 expeditiously and to conclude the same within a period of one year from the date of receipt of the complaint as mandated under Section 36B of the Advocates Act.

    12.2 Only in exceptional case and for the reasons to be recorded where it is found that for valid reasons, the proceedings could not be completed within the period stipulated under Section 36B of the Advocates Act, then and then only such proceedings shall stand transferred to the Bar Council of India and on such transfer the Bar Council of India shall also dispose of the such transferred proceedings/complaints within a period of one year from receipt of such transferred proceedings.

    13. Having regard to the aforesaid provisions and bearing in mind the fact that 1273 complaints (minus 27 complaints which are disposed) are pending before the Bar Council of India, it is just and necessary that a mechanism be found for disposal of the said complaints in accordance with the procedure prescribed.

    For an efficient and quick disposal of the complaints by the Bar Council of India vis-a-vis those complaints which have been transferred to it as per section 36B of the Act, the Bar Council of India may consider empanelling experienced and seasoned advocates and/or retired judicial officers to act as Inquiry Officers where an inquiry would be necessitated. On such inquiry being concluded the report of the Inquiry Officers could be received by the Bar Council of India. On consideration of the said inquiry report, the Bar Council of India could pass appropriate orders on the complaint.

    The aforesaid suggestion is being made bearing in mind the number of complaints that are pending before Bar Council of India, that is, the transferred complaints which would act as the disciplinary authority on such transfer as it would be highly impossible for the said complaint to be disposed of within a reasonable time if the inquiry is also to be conducted by the Bar Council of India.

    Hence the Bar Council of India may issue suitable directions to the State Bar Council to enlist a panel of Inquiry Officers for the purpose of conducting the inquiry on behalf of the Bar Council of India in the respective States itself and on conclusion of the said inquiry to transmit the inquiry report to the Bar Council of India for enabling it to take it further action in the matter.

    This would also enable the complainants and the concerned advocates against whom the complaints are made to appear before the Inquiry Officers wherever such an inquiry is instituted in the State where the complaint has been filed. This would also remove the difficulties caused to the parties to travel from various parts of the country to Delhi for appearing before the inquiry, if any, to be conducted on the complaints filed by the complainants.

    Further and as directed hereinabove, the Bar Council of India to also issue suitable directions to the State Bar Council to conclude the proceedings from the complaints filed against the advocates within a period of one year since the intention of the Parliament appears to be to decide on the said complaint within the said period which is a reasonable period. The object and purpose of section 36B of the Act is not to encourage delay in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top