SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI., Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J.B. Pardiwala, JJ.
Pawan Khera – Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 74 of 2023
Decided On : 20-03-2023
Transfer of FIRs - Jurisdiction - The court entertained the petition to decide whether the FIRs against the petitioner should be clubbed in one jurisdiction, and ultimately ordered the subsequent FIRs to be transferred to the jurisdiction of the first FIR.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought the transfer and clubbing of FIRs registered in different jurisdictions in relation to a press conference.
Finding of the Court:
The court ordered the subsequent FIRs to be transferred to the jurisdiction of the first FIR and extended the interim bail till a specified date, allowing the petitioner to apply for regular bail before the jurisdictional court.
Issues: Transfer and clubbing of FIRs, jurisdictional authority, interim bail, and disposal of the petition.
Ratio Decidendi: The subsequent FIRs were ordered to be transferred to the jurisdiction of the first FIR, and the interim bail was extended, allowing the petitioner to apply for regular bail before the jurisdictional court.
Final Decision: The petition was disposed of, and pending applications were also disposed of.
ORDER
1. The details of the FIRs which have been registered against the petitioner are set out below:
(i) FIR No 65 of 2023 registered at PS Hazratganj, Lucknow on 20 February 2023;
(ii) FIR No 86 of 2023 registered at PS Cantt, Varanasi on 20 February 2023; and
(iii) FIR No 19 of 2023 registered at PS Haflong, Dima Hasao, Assam on 22 February 2023.
2. By the order of this Court dated 23 February 2023, the petition was entertained confined to the issue as to whether the FIRs which were registered against the petitioner should be clubbed in one and the same jurisdiction. Such a course of action has been previously adopted by this Court in Arnab Ranjan Goswami v Union of India, (2020) 14 SCC 2012.
3. Notice was accordingly issued on the prayer of the petitioner for transferring and clubbing of the FIRs which were registered in respect of the press conference in question in one jurisdiction.
4. On 23 February 2023, this Court issued the following interim directions:
"(iv) In order to enable the petitioner to apply for regular bail before the jurisdictional court, upon the FIRs being transferred to one jurisdiction, we direct that the petitioner shall be released on interim bail by the court of the competent Magistrate at Delhi where he is to be produced this evening;
(v) The above order is passed in connection with Haflong PS Case No 19 of 2023."
5. The above order was directed to remain in operation till 28 February 2023 and has since been extended on 27 February 2023 and 3 March 2023.
6. Mr Muhammad Ali Khan, counsel appears for the petitioner.
7. Pursuant to the notice to the States of Uttar Pradesh and Assam, Mr Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General of India along with Ms Aishwarya Bhati, Additional Solicitor General of India appears on behalf of the States of Uttar Pradesh and Assam. Ms Garima Prashad, Additional Advocate General assisted Mr Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General for the State of Uttar Pradesh.
8. During the course of the hearing, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has reiterated that the petitioner stands by the unconditional apology which was tendered on his behalf by Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, senior counsel who appeared on 23 February 2023.
9. The first FIR was registered at PS Hazratganj, Lucknow. We order and direct that the subsequent FIRs registered at PS Cantt, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh and at PS Haflong, Dima Hasao, Assam, shall stand transferred to PS Hazratganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh.
10. The ad-interim order which was passed by this Court on 23 February 2023 (extended by the orders dated 27 February 2023 and 3 March 2023) shall stand extended till 10 April 2023. The petitioner would be at liberty to apply for regular bail before the jurisdictional court. All the contentions of the parties are left open to be urged before the jurisdictional court.
11. The Petition is accordingly disposed of.
12. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
The court has the authority to transfer and club FIRs in one jurisdiction, and can extend interim bail to enable the petitioner to apply for regular bail before the jurisdictional court.
Petition under Article 32 of Constitution of India cannot be entertained for quashing FIRs when petitioner has alternate remedy under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 before jurisdictio....
The court emphasized the specific nature of the offenses under different State enactments and recent judgments in declining to grant the relief sought by the petitioner under Article 32 of the Consti....
The court emphasized the principles of clubbing FIRs and the treatment of subsequently registered FIRs as statements under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ensuring that bail granted in....
Clubbing of FIRs – Multiplicity of proceedings will not be in larger public interest – Other offences not part of special enactments can also be tried by Special Court under concerned State legislati....
The court emphasized that multiplicity of proceedings would not be in the larger public interest and directed the clubbing of FIRs state-wise for one trial, allowing subsequent FIRs to be treated as ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.