SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 1066

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, DIPANKAR DATTA
Unibros – Appellant
Versus
All India Radio – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Sachin Gupta, AOR Mr. Jagdish Vatsa, Adv. Mr. Sameer Rohtagi, Adv. Mr. T.s. Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Kartikey Singh, Adv. Mr. Sachin Gupta, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR

JUDGMENT :

Dipankar Datta, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal, at the instance of M/s Unibros (“appellant”, hereafter), registers a challenge to the judgment and order dated 9th December, 2019 in FAO (OS) 229/2010 passed by the High Court of Delhi (“High Court”, hereafter) dismissing an appeal carried by the appellant under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”, hereafter). Vide the impugned judgment, a Division Bench affirmed the judgment and order of a learned Single Judge dated 25th February, 2010 whereby an objection of the All India Radio (“respondent”, hereafter) under section 34 of the Act was allowed resulting in setting aside of an arbitral Award dated 15th July, 2002 to the extent it awarded loss of profit to the appellant.

3. The relevant facts, discerned from the records, reveal that the appellant was awarded a work contract by the respondent to carry out construction of Delhi Doordarshan Bhawan, Mandi House, Phase-II, New Delhi. The work was scheduled to commence on 12th April, 1990 and reach completion on 11th April, 1991; however, it su


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top